User talk:NT3141

Could you please respect the Wikipedia etiquette and encyclopedic norms? I don't care if your feelings were hurt by the Wheel Of Time adaptation, you are not helping your case by causing vandalism here.

December 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Wheel of Time (TV series). Nemov (talk) 19:59, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Don’t see how I’m vandalising, it’s a simple fact NT3141 (talk) 20:01, 10 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Could you possibly elaborate more on what you mean? ― Blaze The WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:22, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I honestly don't agree with you being given a final warning since your edits appear to be in good faith. However, edit warring is not an acceptable way to handle your edits. See WP:BRD. ― Blaze The WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:24, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Yes. The show runner has said himself that this is a loose adaptation of the story. I don’t see how it is vandalism to add this to the description. NT3141 (talk) 20:25, 10 December 2021 (UTC)


 * If what you are saying is true could you find a reliable source stating this? Wikipedia's information is based on reliable sources. See WP:VERIFIABILITY for more info ― Blaze The WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:28, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , it wasn't the only edit the user made. User also added spoiler details that shouldn't be in the summary. This also happened with several other accounts are suddenly making the same edits. There's nothing good faith about this and it's either sock accounts or brigading. Nemov (talk) 20:32, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * No one appears to be trying to start a discussion so it's still edit warring. ― Blaze The WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:35, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * However I have removed my warning for edit warring from Jonatansan's page since I can't tell if this truly is vandalism. ― Blaze The WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:38, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * So you think by some accident a load of newish accounts starting making the same edit on this article? I'm perplexed by your confusion. This is a simple case of vandalism by someone who is upset with the series or harbors some other grudge. Nemov (talk) 20:41, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm not saying that it's an accident. The main edit I am seeing (which is adding "very loosely" or "loosely") doesn't seem like something harmful. This user has said that the show runner themself said it's a loose adaptation, and so I asked them to provide a reliable source which they have not done so yet. It makes sense that the showrunner would say such a thing, however it still needs to be backed up by reliable sources. Also may I ask what's the issue with spoiler details? Wikipedia isn't censored so there should be no need to avoid spoilers. ― Blaze The Wolf</b>Talk<sub title="Discord Username" style="margin-left:-22q;">Blaze Wolf#6545 20:53, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * If you think it's 1 person then feel free to start a sockpuppet report. IF it's coordinated then I don't know how you'd prove that. ― <b style="background:#0d1125;color:#51aeff;padding:1q;border-radius:5q;">Blaze The Wolf</b>Talk<sub title="Discord Username" style="margin-left:-22q;">Blaze Wolf#6545 20:56, 10 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Those details are not cited and they haven't been revealed in the TV series. It's currently a mystery in the TV series, but those who have read the book would know the answer. It doesn't belong in the summary and it's trollish behavior for a user to add that in that section. Again, not a good faith addition. I have been watching this page now for several weeks and you can just look at the edit history of the page over the last 24 hours to see something is amiss, but I guess I'm wasting my time trying to explain what should be obvious. Thanks for your help. Nemov (talk) 21:03, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm simply just trying to make sense of the situation, but clearly this user who was unaware of WP:BRD is just vandalising an article ― <b style="background:#0d1125;color:#51aeff;padding:1q;border-radius:5q;">Blaze The Wolf</b>Talk<sub title="Discord Username" style="margin-left:-22q;">Blaze Wolf#6545 21:13, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. Sorry, I really don’t understand what I’ve done wrong here… NT3141 (talk) 20:27, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Noted about edit warring. NT3141 (talk) 20:28, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

There is no grudge. How does adding a single descriptor mean that I or other users near a grudge? It doesn’t detract from the page, and it in fact conveys a more accurate summary. Explain please how it 1. Detracts from the page, the description or the story, or 2. Causes harm to any of the above in any way. That would be vandalism. This — no. And I am trying to find the link where I saw this quote, by the way. NT3141 (talk) 20:44, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * If one user makes a change in good faith that's one thing. Several users making the same change either means it'a coordinated attack on the article or a user with multiple accounts. Neither is working in good faith and both are violations of Wikipedia policies. In order to make the change go to the article and find consensus for the change. Nemov (talk) 20:48, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

It certainly wasn’t coordinated. I made a change and found it changed back several times. Next time I’ll negotiate, but to be honest I really didn’t see how something so small could be a problem. What other users do is not my concern, if they also changed it back to my change then perhaps they agreed. 🤷‍♀️ You haven’t explained to me how it is a negative change or why it should be called “vandalism” NT3141 (talk) 20:53, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

I’ve tried to attach a link here several times now. Why is it not reflecting?

Please explain how my edit was harmful. NT3141 (talk) 21:16, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!
Thank you :) NT3141 (talk) 20:40, 10 December 2021 (UTC)