User talk:NUMIDICUS

March 2024
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Arab migrations to the Maghreb, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Skitash (talk) 16:18, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
Your recent editing history at Icosium shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Skitash (talk) 21:08, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Icosium. Skitash (talk) 21:28, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. &#126; ToBeFree (talk) 21:35, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

NUMIDICUS (talk) 21:46, 5 May 2024 (UTC)


 * , edit warring is disruptive even if you are right. Please note that the block applies to you as a person, and that editing while logged out would now be prohibited block evasion. It was already problematic when you did it before the block, but it's now simply strictly prohibited and would make an unblock extremely unlikely. Contributions made in violation of a block may be freely undone by anyone. &#126; ToBeFree (talk) 21:50, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
 * The block isn't a problem at all, I am just asking you, The algerian embassies and Algerian government recognizes the name Algiers as given to it by Bellughin ben Ziri, I am simply asking you to correct the information on that page and keep me blocked and also keep the page protected, the other user sabotaged an official data of the algerian government and I am simply saying just look into it please. NUMIDICUS (talk) 21:55, 5 May 2024 (UTC)