User talk:NVSI

Proposed deletion of "Broker Price Opinion"
The deletion of an article you created, Broker Price Opinion, has been proposed for the following reason:


 * No sources. Reads like an indirect ad.

You are welcome to improve the article to meet Wikipedia's quality standards and remove the deletion notice from the article. You may also remove the notice if you disagree with the deletion, though in such cases, further discussion may take place at Articles for deletion, and the article may still be deleted if there is a consensus to do so.

Wikipedia has certain standards for inclusion that all articles must meet. Certain types of article must establish the notability of their subject by asserting its importance or significance. Additionally, since Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, content inappropriate for an encyclopedia, or content that would be more suited to somewhere else (such as a directory or social networking website) is not acceptable. See What Wikipedia is not for the relevant policy. You may wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 02:30, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Broker Price Opinion
A tag has been placed on Broker Price Opinion requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. //  Chris  (complaints) • (contribs) 02:59, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia, because it has been identified as an account used for promotion of a company or group, with a username that implies that this has been done by that company or group. See Business' FAQ and Conflict of interest.

This kind of activity is considered spamming and is forbidden by Wikipedia policies. In addition, the use of a username like yours violates our username policy.

You may appeal this block by adding the text  or emailing the administrator who blocked you. Your reason should include your response to this issue and a new username you wish to adopt that does not violate our username policy (specifically, understand that accounts are for individuals, not companies or groups, and that your username should reflect this). Usernames that have already been taken are listed here.

Darn this is complicated! I will be more than happy to change the user name to my own.
 * So far, all of your edits on Wikipedia have been about your own business. Under the conflict of interest guidelines, we all agree not to write about ourselves or our own businesses.  Now that you know that you won't be writing about your business, do you still want a Wikipedia account?  What other kinds of edits do you think you'll be making? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:04, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi - I am new to the wikipedia environment and certainly was hoping to do it right. NVSI is a trade group specifically qualified to discuss what an actual BPO is. I thought the content was not self-serving as written, but have no issue at all changing it. I was trying to create something that provides real information. I am happy to re-write, but could use guidance. first, I can't see it anymore to re-edit becuase the page now redirects to appraisals which is not actually relevant. They are very different things. On the content, maybe someone can help me re-write to wikipedia standards? I'd really like to learn how to do wikipedia properly, but I can honestly say for a newbie, it's not too easy to figure out some of it...