User talk:NYKevin/Archive 1

If you want to talk to me, please leave a message here. I will reply here. I will not watch your talk page unless the conversation originated there and has not migrated to this page. Comments placed here will be addressed more rapidly than comments on your talk page, and I often forget to check my watch page, so if I have not replied to a conversation on your talk page, note it here. In that case, I will reply on your talk page (or wherever the discussion originated). I do not watch every page that I comment on or edit, and I rarely watch AfD pages except for controversial discussions. If you'd like to talk to me about a discussion, comment, or action, a quote or diff would be nice. -- Thin boy  00  @925, i.e. 21:11, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Gnostic Gospels
I've looked on WP:Clean and I don't see an entry for Gnostic Gospels. Where is the entry and what does it say? jbolden1517Talk 02:13, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I guess it got removed, I don't remember what it said, go ahead and remove the template. Thinboy00 14:49, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

New York City Meetup
The agenda for the next meetup includes the formation of a Wikimedia New York City local chapter. Hope to see you there!--Pharos 20:28, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Hello badge
Hi. I made a Wiki Hello badge in case anyone's interested in using it for the Meetup. It's on the Meetup page. Nightscream 16:46, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 18:04, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Your VandalProof Application
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Thinboy00. As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank again for your interest in VandalProof. βcommand 16:48, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

WP:AIV
Hi Thinboy00

Your report here stated that the IP had committed "vandalism after final warning, vandalism directly after release of block". Neither of these were true. This was the first edit by the IP in several months, they were not warned and they were last blocked in August.

Please be more careful, especially when using automated editing tools, to avoid wasting administrator time. Thanks. ➔ REDVEЯS would like to show you some puppies 20:25, 27 November 2007 (UTC)


 * From the top of WP:AIV:

Editors: Before listing a vandal here, ensure that:


 * 1) The vandal is active now, has been sufficiently warned, and has vandalized after a recent last warning, except in unusual circumstances.
 * 2) Your report concisely states what the vandal is doing (including an edit summary with the IP address or username).

Reports which do not adhere to the above will be declined.


 * You may wish to read Guide to administrator intervention against vandalism carefully before reporting again. You may also wish to ensure that, when you use Twinkle, you only tick accurate boxes for your reports. ➔ REDVEЯS would like to show you some puppies 20:34, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

A message placed on my userpage
Dear Thinboy, Sometimes to omit something may give the reader a false impression. For example, if I were to edit the "Thin" part of your name because it "appears to be non-neutral" people would have considerably less idea of what you are like. Similarly, by not including the contoversial and misleading journalistic practices of Ed O'Loughlin people might get a false impression of what he does. His supporters can put forward evidence to the contrary but simply to wipe out reasoned, referenced contributions reminds me of censorship. —The preceding text was posted.