User talk:NZMann

Welcome!
Hello, NZMann, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Hardeep Singh Billu, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! DMySon (talk) 18:07, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hardeep Singh Billu


A tag has been placed on Hardeep Singh Billu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. DMySon (talk) 18:07, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Barinder Singh Jinder moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Barinder Singh Jinder, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 18:09, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ranvir Singh Lali


A tag has been placed on Ranvir Singh Lali requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Bbb23 (talk) 18:29, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jaswinder Singh Nagra


A tag has been placed on Jaswinder Singh Nagra requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Bbb23 (talk) 18:30, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Jaswinder Singh Nagra for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jaswinder Singh Nagra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jaswinder Singh Nagra until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bbb23 (talk) 21:15, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Ranvir Singh Lali for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ranvir Singh Lali is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ranvir Singh Lali until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bbb23 (talk) 21:16, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Daljit Singh
Your edits were nothing but vandalism. I've reverted all, and it was a bit of a chore to do so. If you continue in this fashion, you risk being blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:57, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Sorry, my intention is not to vandalise, it is to contribute. NZMann (talk) 23:03, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, NZMann. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Supreme Sikh Society of New Zealand, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 22:59, 5 September 2021 (UTC)


 * I sincerely declare that I am not paid by the Supreme Sikh Society of New Zealand or anyone else to write any article on Wikipedia. I understand that on Wikipedia, we want articles that are reliable, therefore, I do my best to find and add the most reliable information backed by reliable sources. The Supreme Sikh Society of New Zealand has had regular coverage in the NZ media lately, therefore, I thought I'd create and improve a Wikipedia article about them. My intention is to contribute. This is the latest documentary about the Society and its service: www.tvnz.co.nz/shows/sunday/clips/time-of-need NZMann (talk) 23:17, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Even if you are not paid, I have trouble believing that you are not affiliated with the Society in some way. You haven't just created an article about them. You've attempted to create multiple articles related to them and fought very hard, sometimes in disruptive ways, to keep those articles.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:16, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Barinder Singh Jinder
Hello, NZMann. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Barinder Singh Jinder, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Barinder Singh Jinder


Hello, NZMann. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Barinder Singh Jinder".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:41, 5 March 2022 (UTC)