User talk:NaBUru38/Archive 1

Welcome to Wikipedia
Hello NaBUru38, and Willkommen! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like being a wiki editor and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Again, welcome!  Signature brendel  19:52, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

FSI
I read your changes on FSI. If you do a google search for fuel straight injection it does come up with this as the first result. Audi and volkswagen use the same engines in their cars. I put the fuel straight injection on there as my father who works for volkswagen told me that was wrong, and FSI stands for Fuel Staight Injection not Stratified.

Please write back. -- Bearingbreaker92 23:19, 25 September 2006 (UTC)


 * As I wrote in the edit, if you search "Fuel Stratified Injection" in Google you will get over 17,000 answers, while "Fuel Straight Injection" returns only 3,000. But I did find a more "official" piece of information: this British VW website clearly says Stratified. The FSI page doesn't explain the meaning of the acronym. Because of these two clues, I guess Fuel Stratified Injection is the correct term. -- NaBUru38 23:01, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Join our project
Hello there, I noticed you are Uruguayan. Would you happen to be interested in joining the Uruguay Project? It's a project meant to expand and organize all Uruguay-related pages, and since we are a little short of people, we could certainly use your help. Wesborland 02:36, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Recent "minor fixes"
If you're changing HTML to Unicode that's a good thing. However, I think you might be using the wrong separator; see dash for the difference between an en-dash and an em-dash. In my browser, the dash you're using looks too big to be the en-dash. --DeLarge 22:38, 13 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Well, I didn't research on the use of hyphens and dashes, it's just that when I found the huge dash in the Insert tab of the Edit page, I started to modify year ranges when I made changes to infoboxes. But it seems that you're right, so let's end this here. Thanks for the comment! NaBUru38 20:10, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Volvo Cars timeline
Why did you replace the wording "large family car" with "compact executive car" in the Volvo Cars timeline? I didnt revert it because I want to hear your reason for doing so. --Dahlis 23:04, 29 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Unlike other European luxury car manufacturers, Volvo reduced the size of some of its models during the 1990s. The 760, 960 and S80 were more or less in the very same as the 5 Series, E-Class and other executive cars, between 4800 and 4900 mm long among other characteristics. The 850 was smaller then them, but larger than the C-Class, A4 and 3 Series. Later, the S60 shrunk and now clearly stands as a compact executive car, with similar size and pricing as those German rivals. The S40 was born slightly smaller than them, but the current generation is actually 100 mm smaller than the first one. The C30 is basically the same car, and its rivals are all hatchbacks: BMW 1 Series, Audi A3... As it is alone in the market, there are rumours of sedan versons of those two models.


 * The S60 is not as luxurious as the Germans, but it is in the same luxury/price range as the Alfa 159, Saab 9-3, Cadillac BLS and similar models, which I consider also compact executive cars. That's what I think... now I'd love to hear your thoughts! -- NaBUru38 15:19, 30 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Well im Swedish and I see these cars every day, the Volvo V70 is the most sold car in Sweden and has been so for many years. Except for the S80 and the earlier 960/S90 i dont see these cars as luxurious or executive cars they are standard family cars driven by normal people.


 * The size difference isnt really that large the 850 replaced the 240 and its only 30 mm shorter, the larger 700/900 series were replaced by the S80/V70 and the S80 is only 80 mm shorter than the last generation 940. The S40 replaced the earlier 400 series and is actually larger than the models it replaced. --Dahlis 16:05, 30 December 2006 (UTC)


 * All of the stuff about executive cars sounds like original research. Do you have an external source to support you, NaBUru? A reliable source (EuroNCAP) specifically refers to the S60 as a "large family car".

Chrysler Timeline
The Chrysler timeline you edited is for the North American market only. If you would like to, you can create a separate template for the European market. --Jnelson09 23:54, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your comment
I'd appreciate your comment. I'm new on Wikipedia and I may not use standard techniques of edit pages. Next time I'll follow your advise. Bye, Gaemon

Civic
Alright, I started work on teh Civic article. I have somethings planned today, so my revamp will be off and on. If is on the page, I am not able to continue my revamp at the time, and if  is on teh page, I am coninuing my revamp. Happy editing! Karrmann 15:47, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

SUV --> sport utility vehicle
Please note that redirects are a feature, not a bug: Redirect. "In particular, there should never be a need to replace redirect with redirect ." So SUV --> SUV is undesirable, especially on Mercury Timeline, which has knock on effects on the cache and increases the server load by an order of magnitude (see High-risk templates#Rationale). Regards, --DeLarge 21:02, 1 March 2007 (UTC)


 * I did already know that policy, but I still have some doubts on some aspects. Your Mercury template is good to point what I did, but there are other examples with different characteristics. In this edit I made other significant changes, like the Tnavbar, so I took the chance to make other minor fixes, like new style code and redirect fixes. My question is: if I'm editing a page, can I use the chance to make these kind of fixes? -- NaBUru38 16:46, 4 March 2007 (UTC)


 * It's irrelevant whether or not you're making other edits. Changing links to redirect pages is not "fixing" them. As already quoted, "there should never be a need to replace [[redirect with redirect .]]" Redirects are a feature, not a bug. It is considered more transparent and intuitive, especially to casual editors, for them to be able to type SUV] ] and create a link to [[Sport utility vehicle via a redirect than it is to pipe the link and go directly. --DeLarge 21:54, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Recent edits
Please undo your multiple wikilinks to turbodiesel. By wikipedia standards, only the first use of a word in body text is to be linked. Thank you, Leonard G. 16:25, 4 March 2007 (UTC)


 * I had read in a guideline that if an article is very long, there could be more links to a same page (sadly I can't find it, so I can't proof it). "Diesel engine" is really long (around 68kB), so I left two links, one in the beginning and onew towards the end. I hope that helps. -- NaBUru38 16:42, 4 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The page you are thinking of is Manual of Style (links). --DeLarge 21:54, 4 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Think you can fix the infoboxes on the Cadillac SRX and Buick LaCrosse pages? -- Bull-Doser 19:14, 4 March 2007 (UTC)


 * To fix what? The links?, which links? Sorry, if you are more precise I'll answer you. -- NaBUru38 17:24, 5 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Those pages need cleanups, with the infoboxes, however. You can also fix the Chevrolet Malibu.  I wasn't saying about turbodiesel. -- Bull-Doser 18:12, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Plymouth Timeline
I don't know what you did, and what was so awful about the template(let's no go there), but all I know is that after you made changes to this template, there's a visible seem on both sides of the "sports" category, and it wasn't there before. You should always preview your work before you edit and artiicle or especially a template. I want you to try to fix it, because I don't have time to sit around and read through the entire edit page to find your mistake. Bavaria 11:31, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Never mind, I fixed your problem, just try not to let it happen again. Bavaria 11:37, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

It's no big deal, it's just there were only the separators on either side of the sports cars and nowhere else. It just looked out of place. Bavaria 11:13, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Infobox solutions and stuff
Thanks for your message. I have actually typed a reply and managed to get it erased with a stupid click, so here I go again - excuse me for being a tad brief this time.

I went to the Spanish Wikipedia and saw the other Infobox arrangement, and I am afraid I am not that impressed - to me it is a bit too clumsy and hard to make out... I was actually thinking of having them put side by side in columns (within the infobox width) - field descriptions (height, width etc.) in the first row, then measurements, and perhaps an extra row for imperials. I am afraid I am not that well-versed in wikitables to offer you an example, but I hope you got what I mean. A second solution, which actually does not preclude the first, would be to have the specs part of the infobox collapsible (using the show/hide function and hidden by default).

As concerns engine data, I am afraid those do not work too well in prose - it provides for a rather boring paragraph where the actual data are hard to make out. Being tech data essentially, those are better presented in some form of a table or list - I guess it would be good to devise a neat standard for those, as I guess we have to include those in articles anyway and taking them out of the infobox would help shed its "weight". I'd put it up to discussion at the WikiProject, but I am afraid folks there are preoccupied by the absolutely most demanding topic of blanking out license plate numbers... PrinceGloria 15:05, 30 April 2007 (UTC)


 * I think the magic word in Wikicode is "colspan" - make all columns "colspan=3" (or 4) and only the rows with dimensions would use the colums. I once saw a template that somehow used some "sections" to get around the need to place colspan in every line, but I can't recall which one it was. I guess rather than fiddle with Paint (unless you really want to), you could ask at some WikiArtist noticeboard (I've heard there is one, I forgot the actual address) to help you (or, actually, us as a WikiProject) with coding that! PrinceGloria 17:02, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Chevrolet HHR
The article is messed up there. Can you please make fixes in the infobox and add SI units, plus add it to the "Compact SUVs" category? -- Bull-Doser 21:55, 4 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Done! -- NaBUru38 15:02, 6 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I am sorry to butt in, but how is HHR an SUV? It's a compact minivan, just like the PT Cruiser! PrinceGloria 16:19, 6 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Well, IIRC the Focus C-Max or the Altea don't have much more interior flexibility beyond a split-fold rear seat, and I believe the HHR and PT have the same. That said, I realize that compact minivan/MPV is a primarily European classification, so perhaps we can state they are "compact models" (to avoid calling them "cars" as I believe they are legally "trucks" in the US). PrinceGloria 17:02, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Links
I have read your message about links, and I have taken your advice.SenatorsTalk 01:24, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Plymouth GTX
Can you please make infobox fixes on the Plymouth GTX page, please? Do not do the Cimarron. -- Bull-Doser 17:46, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Auto in/mm
Auto in:

Auto mm:

As for converting imperial/metric dimensions, here's this new system you should use! Auto in/auto mm! You should start testing it on one of your edits. Like the Ford Escape Hybrid page is missing some metric dimensions. -- Bull-Doser 00:10, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Children of Men citations

 * Remember that the citations you are looking for must directly speak about both the cars and the film - a lot of people have trouble grasping that caveat at times - I did when I first started. If you find something that says that the Peugot only has 2 doors (or whatnot) but not how this car was used in the film, and cite it in the article, it will very likely be removed as OR by synthesis. If you find a citation, you can run it past me if you want. Clearly, you have a vast knowledge of cars - something I just as clearly do not have, and I am sure you have lots to contribute to the project. i don't want you to get discouraged if your hard work gets reverted right away. Let me know how I can help. :) - Arcayne   (cast a spell)  20:15, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of recent automobile models by type
An editor has nominated List of recent automobile models by type, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 13:14, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Modern North American Honda vehicles
A tag has been placed on Template:Modern North American Honda vehicles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 22:29, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Template:Automobile classification
Hi. Your comment on the VW Golf Plus may well be correct, afterall, it is based on the VW Golf, which is a C-segment car. However, moving the Golf Plus to the next higher classification would have a knock-on effect on the VW Touran, the VW Sharan and the VW Eurovan.

My logic would be to leave them as they are - the following basis: Golf Plus is a small 5-seater, the Touran is a mid-size 5- or 7-seater, and the Sharan (which is the same basic car as the Galaxy and SEAT Alhambra) and Eurovan are both large size 7-seater.

I think there is some slight confusion between the North American "minivan", vs the European "large MPV" - because different terminologies are used. The minivan tag originated in the US from van conversions, such as the VW Caravelle, whereas the European originated "MPV" were unique designs of 7-seater cars, which were not derived from any van.

All that said - where do we go from here? Kind regards -- Teutonic_Tamer (talk to Teutonic_Tamer) 12:48, 8 July 2008 (UTC)


 * OK, is it better now? -- Teutonic_Tamer (talk to Teutonic_Tamer) 11:03, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Flexible-fuel vehicle
Hola amigo editor. This is to inform you that I rv your good faith edit for two reasons: 1. As the lead says, in Europe E85 flex is important only in Swden, therefore, it is the only European country that deserves its own subsection, and 2. your edit involuntarily messed up with the article layout, leaving a blank hole in the middle. If you think this change is key, or have other reasons for separating the European countries, let's discuss it in the article's Talk page first, but anyway, if the change is to going ahead, please move the table, pics, etc to maintain a proper layout wihtout blank holes. I am now completing my research to clarify a few minor technical details (actual temps for cold start problems as they are different in the US and Brazil, and the fact that Brazilian E100 flex cars have problems running with E0, as sold in Uruguay, Argentina and Paraguay, so E20 is the minimum they accept except for two models, the Fiat Tetra and the Renault Cleo), and after some nitpicking on the writing, I will submit it for GA process, that's why I am so picky about the layout. See you around.--189.123.42.108 (talk) 02:15, 2 October 2008 (UTC) Sorry, I forgot to log, I am user:Mariordo--189.123.42.108 (talk) 02:16, 2 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Currently I'm working at the Spanish-language es:Wikiproyecto:Automóviles, so I'm not checking the content in most articles. I just found that this article's section structure was illogical:


 * 3.2 Europe
 * 3.2.1 Sweden
 * 3.2.2 Other European countries (introductory text)
 * 3.2.2.1 France
 * 3.2.2.2 Germany
 * 3.2.2.3 Ireland
 * 3.2.2.4 United Kingdom

, so I tried to change it to this:


 * 3.2 Europe (introductory text)
 * 3.2.1 Sweden
 * 3.2.2 France
 * 3.2.3 Germany
 * 3.2.4 Ireland
 * 3.2.5 United Kingdom

Perhaps some of those sections can be merged or deleted, I don't care now. Both when I previewed and now when I check the old version, I don't find any hole in the article. So if you agree with my proposal of reordering the sections, you may try to fix that hole. Good luck! --NaBUru38 (talk) 02:44, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * If I look at the article in Mozilla Firefox I do not see the hole, in Windows Explorer I do. Also notice that the arrangement your way, will send Sweden, the most important country for E85s last (the order is alphabetical and for me it does not make sense to leave the leading and most important European country presented as the last -read the leading paragraphs-). But if you insist in all countries equal (look at ethanol fuel, the sections are defined by importance of the country in the industry, not just geographically) and because I will included a couple of pics in the European section, give me some time, and let me do the arrangement of the sections your way, but think about it first.--Mariordo (talk) 03:14, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Merge proposal
Hi NaBUru38, i see you want to propose a merger, to complete the proposal, the best templates are and  ( i'm assuming that you want to merge the engine into the vehicle), and next start a section on the talkpage explaining your proposal so people understand why it should be merged so they can discuss it. Thanks, and there are also stationary bi-fuell engines, so maybe merging a section into the other article might be better. Cheers Mion (talk) 05:25, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Not taking into account Flexible-fuel vehicle -:) Mion (talk) 05:36, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * -removed uncompleted merge proposal. Cheers Mion (talk) 10:11, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Changes to V8 Utes
Just wondering... do you consider this a truck? Whlie i accept internationally it might be called a truck it's a pretty alien term for a racing series based on these. --Falcadore (talk) 21:07, 2 April 2009 (UTC)


 * A pickup truck is a type of light truck (camioneta in Spanish). Since Americans call them just trucks, the article truck racing also includes them. I agree with you that the NASCAR Truck Series, V8 Utes and British Pickup Truck Racing are completely different from true trucks (lorries, camiones in Spanish) used in the FIA European Truck Racing and Brazilian Fórmula Truck. Luckily, few pages point to the article Truck racing, so all the information about pickup truck racing could be split to a new article. I hope that you understand my point of view. Good bye! --NaBUru38 (talk) 17:20, 3 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I did the split: Pickup truck racing. --NaBUru38 (talk) 19:54, 3 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Didn't have to, the problem is mine, it is however a term not used but its not any real different tyre/tire spelling really. --Falcadore (talk) 00:31, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * By the way - why do you think there is a connection between Utes and V8 Supercar? --Falcadore (talk) 11:15, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * It was months ago, but I traced an edit through the edit history to you stating The V8 Ute Racing Series is a pickup truck racing series derived from Australian touring car series V8 Supercars which is patently false and I wanted to know where you had derived this from. --Falcadore (talk) 00:01, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
 * You are aware that wild guessing is completely against Wikipedia guidelines? Do you have any other articles in particular where you have wild guessed and need to be fact checked, or just all of your edits? --Falcadore (talk) 00:43, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Mondello Park
You tagged Mondello Park as a copyvio but did not provide a link to the page it is a copyvio of. If you are unable to show where the copyright violation has been taken from, then please remove the claim. Thanks ww2censor (talk) 03:31, 13 May 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry, I've just fixed the mistake. I did add the website but to a wrong template. When I found the right one (before I saved the edit), I forgot to put the website to it. I hope that the violation is clear now. See you later! --NaBUru38 (talk) 13:17, 13 May 2009 (UTC)


 * OK, I see what you did and what you removed. Because the whole article is no longer a copyvio, after you removed the copy/paste text from the webpage you indicated, you did not really need to add the copyvio notice. You were correct to remove the copyright violation text but what is left is no longer a copyright violation, so the copyvio tag is not really necessary. The reduced size article could do with a decent copyedit to improve it but it is notable. BTW, are you familiar with the Talkback template to notify editors that you have written a message for them on your talk page. ww2censor (talk) 13:31, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of World Le Mans Series
An article that you have been involved in editing, World Le Mans Series, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. IIIVIX ( Talk ) 17:38, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Racing driver infoboxes
Not as such, no. But I think there could still be problems that might crop up. It would need a very thorough usage document prepared, with cut-and-paste pro forma examples laid out for major series and detailed explanation of use. In addition, there is still the problem of jurisdiction. We'd definitely need to keep an eye on it from WP:Motorsport to prevent the whole template being disrupted too often, and perhaps a note to discuss changes prior to implementing them. If these points can be addressed then I would support the idea.  Pyrop e  16:06, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

FIA GT?
I'm a little confused by your renaming of links on several articles. It sems to me that you're combining GT2 and GT3 into a "FIA GT European Championship" for 2010. Unless there's some brand new news on this that I've missed, there is no such thing. GT2 and GT3 will remain separate series in 2010, known as the FIA GT2 European Championship and the FIA GT3 European Championship, and will not run together on track, although they will almost definitely share race weekends. IIIVIX ( Talk ) 21:25, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Further, this is officially the Brasil GT3 Championship, not the Brazilian GT3 Championship. IIIVIX  ( Talk ) 21:26, 9 September 2009 (UTC)


 * First of all, The359, I thought that the official name was in Portuguese (something like "Campeonato Brasileiro de GT3"), and therefore it had to be translated like most series. You are right about the series' name, then.
 * You didn't miss any news from SRO. I just thought that letting the information split would be confusing to both editors and readers. It seems to be that the European GT2 and GT3 series will have a similar format to the one we had until this year with GT1 and GT2. I'm not so sure that European GT2 and GT3 races will be held separately outside the Spa 24 Hours. And since they are expected to have a similar/identical calendar, I thought that it was a good idea to merge the season articles from 2010 onwards and have a single category for them. I can't convince the wikiproject members to change the established policy, so I'll leave it as you made it. See you later! --NaBUru38 (talk) 04:13, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
 * From my understanding GT2 will be identical to FIA GT as it has been up to this year. 2-hour races, 2 drivers per car, about 10 races.  The only major rule change for 2010 will be the Pro-Am requirement.  FIA GT3 will also remain the same for next year, 1-hour races with 2 drivers per car, 12 races over 6 circuits.  I do not know yet if the Spa 24 Hours will be part of the FIA GT3 schedule or if it will remain optional for the teams as it has been in past years.  Spa is still the only place where it has been mentioned that GT2, GT3, and GT4 will run alongside one another.  But as you can see, the schedules will not be identical and GT3 will not be at every circuit GT2 runs at.  IIIVIX  ( Talk ) 06:33, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Sport in the UK
Please note that in most sports (eg. golf, football, cricket, rugby, badminton, field hockey, squash, curling etc etc etc) the governing bodies and organisation of the sports is along national lines (Eng, Wal, Scot, Ire/NI), and not UK lines.

Eg. see: --Mais oui! (talk) 07:05, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Category:Football (soccer) competitions by country


 * Actually, no. I've checked several high-level categories of sport by country and very few of them have England, Scotland and Wales outside United Kingdom (I haven't edited those since your message so you can see the current situation). Theyat are labelled as different countries in some specific contexts (e.g. FIFA). But in non-specific categories such as competitions, teams, people and venues, categories on those national subentities should be inside the United Kingdom. --NaBUru38 (talk) 07:18, 12 September 2009 (UTC)


 * You say "very few of them have England, Scotland and Wales outside United Kingdom". In that case the categorisation is incorrect.
 * Eng, Scot, Wal and Ire/NI are different countries in all contexts, not simply sporting events. I fear that you reveal your opinions on this matter with your odd (strongly pejorative) use of the word "subentities".
 * Wikipedia must reflect the real world. And in the real world, Eng, Scot, Wal and Ire/NI are countries and nations. In fact, Wikipedia even has an article on this topic, and it is packed full of reliable ext refs atesting to the fact. --Mais oui! (talk) 07:42, 12 September 2009 (UTC)


 * First of all, Mais oui!, I live in a far corner of the world. Most Uruguayans don't know much about the difference between England, Great Britain and the United Kingdom and would mix those terms. Sometimes I do that myself just because of unconsciously imitating people I meet everyday, even after reading kilometric articles in this Wikipedia about the issue. And despite having passed an European C2-level exam of English language proficiency, the fact remains that I seldomly hear and talk in that language. Therefore, no matter how hard I try to avoid making language mistakes while contributing to the English-language Wikipedia, I expect to make them and you should too. For instance, I used "subentities" as a more elegant word than "thing", that is, "whatever England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland are, which I do not know". Please don't confuse that with "pejorativeness" or whatever you might fear of me.
 * My view is that it is more appropriate that some categories on English, Welsh and Scottish sports subjects do not get included in the categories by country. I exclude "XXX sport by country" from that situation - for example, they are different are countries to the FIFA but the same to the FIA. I'm talking about subjects such as competitions, teams, people and venues. If I want to look for articles on them and I'm standing at "Cat:Sports XXX", I'd first go to "Cat:Sports XXX by country", then to "Cat:Sports XXX in the United Kingdom", and only then to "Cat:... in some specific place". I do no expect shortcuts, because the Untied Kingdom counts as a country in those contexts. See you later! --NaBUru38 (talk) 20:12, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of City car
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is City car. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/City car. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Automobile classification
Template:Automobile classification has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mighty Antar (talk) 00:51, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Black Bean Games
A tag has been placed on Black Bean Games requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Salvio ( Let's talk 'bout it!) 00:16, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Porsche Carrera Cup
Hiya! Now that you've converted Porsche Carrera Cup into a disambig, could you help clean up the links to the disambig per WP:FIXDABLINKS? Thanks, -- Ja Ga  talk 11:26, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion, guidelines for use at WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.

For well-established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:45, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Invitation to take part in a pilot study
I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to a short survey. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates only 5 minutes. cooldenny (talk) 20:04, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Category:Motorcycle world racing series
Just wondering, is there any reason why you removed categories from a number of articles and replaced them with the non-existend Category:Motorcycle world racing series. Wouldn't Category:World motorcycle racing series have been the better choice, which, as it appears, is a category you yourself created a few days ago? Calistemon (talk) 02:43, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I fixed it all up for you as you seem to be off-line right now. Calistemon (talk) 12:50, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Theorycraft


The article Theorycraft has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Per WP:NEOLOGISM

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 00:21, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Wikimania scholarship
Hi NaBUru38, the scholarship program for next year's Wikimania is expected to start at Dec 1. We will promote it via several channels and I am pretty sure that you will notice. --Lyzzy (talk) 22:35, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi, this message is to let you know about disambiguation links you've recently created. A link to a disambiguation page is almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Like button (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * was linked to +1

Any suggestions for improving this automated tool are welcome. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:53, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

namespace
You mean like the name space as seen here Book:Health care? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 22:27, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Bridgestone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to CART


 * Jean-Pierre Jabouille (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Alpine

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Buildings and structures
Please explain why or how Buildings and structures are linked to geography in category heirarchy trees - I am intrigued... SatuSuro 00:33, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Ooops! - I can see a reason - I have reverted my reversion at the Indonesian tree - have a good new year SatuSuro 00:42, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Rally support truck, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rally (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Ground transportation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Goods (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dirk Werner


The article Dirk Werner has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. &#32; The nominator also raised the following concern:
 * All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. SwisterTwister  talk  21:13, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited LAT Photographic, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages British and Motoring (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 14
Hi. When you recently edited DeltaWing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Direct injection (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Help us develop better software!
Thanks to all of you for commenting on the NOINDEX RfC :). It's always great to be able to field questions like these to the community; it's genuinely the highlight of my work! The NOINDEX idea sprung from our New Page Triage discussion; we're developing a new patrolling interface for new articles, and we want your input like never before :). So if you haven't already seen it, please go there, take a look at the screenshots and mockups and ideas, and add any comments or suggestions you might have to the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 16:46, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 27
Hi. When you recently edited Satoshi Motoyama, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Lyons (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

WP Motorsport in the Signpost
The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Motorsport for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 15:51, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Mabeenot (talk) 16:32, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

EVs in the US
Hola NaBUru38, como haz estado? I replied to your vote/comment on the ongoing renaming discussion here. I pointed it out that there is already a separate article devoted to hybrid electric vehicles in the United States. I would like to know if this fact satisfies your concerns or if you would be still against the proposed renaming. Gracias.--Mariordo (talk) 01:27, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Category:Hillclimbing races
Category:Hillclimbing races, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Bushranger One ping only 03:56, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

List of final placings in the Fußball-Bundesliga
Thank you for the praise, they are not that hard to make. I've created it in Excel and then transfered it to Wikipedia, adding just a bit of formating, the colors and the links. Calistemon (talk) 21:43, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Energy efficiency in transportation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Energy efficiency (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:27, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 36 (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ed Carpenter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:43, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Closed platform, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Media (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Uruguayan Clásico, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AUF (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:43, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Simple English proposal at the Pump
Hello,

As one of the participants in the original Village Pump RFC about getting the Simple Wiki to the top of the Languages, you are invited to participate in the reopened discussion of the same. Your feedback will be appreciated.

Cheers, TheOriginalSoni (talk) 16:00, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Firestone Tire and Rubber Company (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to CART


 * Triple Crown of Motorsport (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to CART

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tom Sneva, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wide World of Sports (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Ideal team for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ideal team is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ideal team until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —Bagumba (talk) 06:55, 7 February 2013 (UTC)