User talk:NaK-Pump

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Literature geek |  T@1k?  06:32, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Baader-Meinhof effect
Transferring conversation here from talk page of deleted article to preserve it; feel free to delete if you don't want it on your talk page, of course.&mdash; alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 17:49, 21 February 2014 (UTC) Is there any reason this article cannot be kept with a section dealing with the issues being discussed on the talk pages? It's really frustrating that a commonly referred to psychological phenomenon does not have a wikipedia page with which one can quickly reference.--NaK-Pump (talk) 02:15, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The article was deleted because there are no reliable sources to establish correct definition of the phenomenon. It is used in many blogs and chats, but there appears no scholarly texts which summarize the meaning and usage of the term. Wikipedia does not accept blogs as sources. Staszek Lem (talk) 17:11, 21 February 2014 (UTC)


 * I was not much involved, though I do remember showing up in response to an RFC. I seem to remember not thinking the article not worth keeping in its own right, but I am a bit nonplussed at its being removed with no more trace than this. Where did it get removed TO? I should have thought that NaK-Pump has a point and that the article title should have been retained as a redir at least. Did I miss something? JonRichfield (talk) 09:57, 21 February 2014 (UTC)


 * That's what "delete" means; some sort of administrator could likely retrieve an archive, but not regular users. The two most recent AfD decisions were adamant that the term be completely removed rather than redirected. NaK, I've seen no rules on creating Talk pages for non-existing articles, but I'm pretty sure explaining the term here would be frowned upon, if that's what you mean. Agyle (talk) 11:35, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
 * You cannot redirect: there are just not enough reliable sources to figure out what is this all about. The BMP resembles many things, and in order to put a redirect somewhere you must have the term BMP used in the corresponding article. But then, you have to establish a connection with this other topic (again, using WP:RS), so here we go. Staszek Lem (talk) 17:11, 21 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Maybe you all could transfer this conversation to a user talk page?  Once an article is deleted it's not supposed to have a talk page any more.&mdash; alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 17:48, 21 February 2014 (UTC)