User talk:NaNa210

NaNa210 (talk) 20:45, 21 September 2016 (UTC)The facts in the article is not well referenced. The description section could use a bit more of a referencing to other articles used in the research. However, the 11 sources used seem to come from very reliable sources. NaNa210 (talk) 20:45, 21 September 2016 (UTC)There is nothing distracting in this article. The article stays on topic and continues to give good information about Dinophysis acuminata. NaNa210 (talk) 20:45, 21 September 2016 (UTC)The article in neutral.It just presents the facts of the protist. There is no bias or claims about this algae. All facts used are written from a very objective standpoint. This allows readers to get a neutral understanding of the subject. NaNa210 (talk) 20:45, 21 September 2016 (UTC)The information comes from older and newer research materials. It has information that is cited and written be multiple people who came together to produce that source. The sources themselves uses primary information from other places and cite those as well. Like this article, these sources are neutral as well. They provide objective standpoints about Dinophysis acuminata and present the research and facts in a well organized manner. The sources used here, have also included sources in their research. Perhaps, if there is any bias, it would be best to evaluate the sources that the people (those in the citations used.) NaNa210 (talk) 20:45, 21 September 2016 (UTC)Feeding and endosymbiosis was underrepresented. This could be due to that note that there isn't too much really known about this particular protist. NaNa210 (talk) 20:45, 21 September 2016 (UTC)I checked some of the links provided in the citations, and they worked perfectly. I was led to great articles. The main this that this writer did was summarize and paraphrase the sources he cited. However, the other information that weren't cited had to come from somewhere, so this article can have some bits and pieces of plagiarism included in it. NaNa210 (talk) 20:45, 21 September 2016 (UTC)Actually, this article was edited quite recently, so it is up to date with most of its information. The article can broaden its information by providing some of the benefits and dangers that this protist causes. What is being done currently, and its importance in its location just to name a few.

Welcome!
Hello, NaNa210, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 02:44, 22 September 2016 (UTC)