User talk:Naagam

Welcome to Wikipedia, .

I undid your recent addition to Neerja because it contains unnecessary words that promote the subject of the article without imparting real information.

Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Questions or place   on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer it! For a step-by-step process on making an article of your own, see our Article Wizard. These pages may be useful to you:

Neutral Point of View Puffery and peacock words Weasel words Manual of Style How to write a great article The five pillars of Wikipedia Help pages

—General534 (talk)

Classic?
Hi there, re: this edit, how can a film that came out less than a year ago be a classic? Puffery. Please stick to mainstream sites as references. Please see WP:RS. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 07:53, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Hello, I'm Cyphoidbomb. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Prem Ratan Dhan Payo without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Diff: Your explanation "Deleted unwanted information" is insufficient to justify removal of that sourced content. If you feel strongly about this, please open a discussion on the article's talk page to seek consensus for removal. Thank you.'' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:25, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

IMDb user reviews
Hi there, re: this edit, IMDb user ratings, or any other online user ratings aren't sufficient for inclusion because the data can be manipulated. Please see MOS:FILM for more info. Also, the MOS:FILM document in general may be very helpful to you, as is explains the sorts of things the community is interested in (and not interested in) seeing in film articles. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:09, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

April 2017
Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to Article 370, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 03:31, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Motion picture content rating system, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sum mer PhD v2.0 03:52, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

May 2018
Hello, I'm Mr. Smart LION. I noticed that you recently removed content from Neerja without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mr. Smart  LION  05:03, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Pseudo-secularism, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. utcursch &#124; talk 00:46, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Removing sourced content
I have undone your edits multiple times on the basis that none of them is properly sourced. Article 15 of the Indian Constitution does not seem to extend to private discrimination. If you believe it does, then please provide sources and citations. It also seems to cover gender identity discrimination pursuant to a 2014 Supreme Court ruling. Again, if you believe the content is false then please provide citations. If you continue undoing edits and removing content without reason you may be banned from editing. Panda2018 0 (talk) 12:06, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

It seems this comment went unheeded. Again, if you believe the Supreme Court rulings extend to public discrimination, then please provide citations to support your claim. Panda2018 0 (talk) 18:31, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

September 2019
Hello, I'm Tamravidhir. I noticed that you recently removed content from LGBT rights in India without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Tamra vidhir (talk) 11:20, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at LGBT rights in India, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you.  Tamra vidhir (talk) 16:46, 6 September 2019 (UTC)