User talk:Nabeelgm

Welcoming all
Hi from ∞😃 Nabeelgm 😃∞ .feel free to share .........

Notification about disabling the Wikipedia collections tool
Thank you for using the collections feature in Wikipedia beta! Due to technical and moderation issues, we will be turning off this experimental feature. Your collections will be available for viewing and export until March 1st. If you would like to save your collection as links on a special Wikipedia page, please fill out the following form. If you are interested in giving your feedback about Wikipedia Collections please do so here.

Thanks,

Jon Katz

Product manager, Wikimedia Foundation

Jkatz (WMF) (talk) 23:58, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (Jamia Darussalam Oomerabad (disambiguation)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Jamia Darussalam Oomerabad (disambiguation), Nabeelgm!

Wikipedia editor Target360YT just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Please make this a Redirect Page instead of a disambiguation page. But thanks for creating the page anyways."

To reply, leave a comment on Target360YT's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

How to do redirects
Hello! This is a response to what you left on my user talk. OK. Firstly: A friendly reminder: Remember to sign your messages with four tildes ( ~ ) at the end. (e.g.: Hello. I am {your name}. ~ ) And to your question... We do redirects by doing: That's all. Simple. Have a nice day! ∞😃 Target360YT 😃∞ (Talk) 14:04, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) REDIRECT page name.

Welcome!
Hello, Nabeelgm, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

^^ Template Message from Template:Welcome ... Have a nice day! ∞😃 Target360YT 😃∞ (Talk) 14:08, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Know-it-all
for visitors to Wikipedia who wish to participate in this project'''. For a detailed account of the Wikipedia project itself, see About. For information on searching and browsing the encyclopedia, see Help:Navigation. | |}

af:Wikipedia:Welkom nuwelinge als:Wikipedia:Willkommen am:Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers! zh-min-nan:Wikipedia:Hoan-gêng sin iōng-chiá ceb:Wikipedia:Maayong pag-abot, higala! cy:Wicipedia:Croeso, newydd-ddyfodiaid da:Hjælp:Velkommen nybegynder dv:ވިކިޕީޑިއާ: އައުބޭފުޅުންނަށް މަރުހަބާ! eo:Vikipedio:Bonvenon al la Vikipedio eu:Wikipedia:Ongietorria fr:Wikipédia:Accueil des nouveaux arrivants ko:위키백과:환영합니다 hr:Wikipedija:Dobro došli ia:Wikipedia:Benvenite it:Aiuto:Benvenuto he:ויקיפדיה:ברוכים הבאים Welcome, newcomers lb:Wikipedia:Wëllkomm lv:Vikipēdija:Esi sveicināts Vikipēdijā lt:Pagalba:Sveiki atvykę į Laisvąją enciklopediją! li:Wikipedia:Wilkóm hu:Wikipédia:Üdvözlünk, látogató! mn:Wikipedia:Википедиад Тавтай морилно уу ne:विकिपीडिया:स्वागत ja:Wikipedia:ウィキペディアへようこそ nn:Wikipedia:Velkommen nds:Wikipedia:Infos för Niege pt:Wikipedia:Boas-vindas ro:Ajutor:Bun venit rmy:Vikipidiya:Mishto avilyan qu:Wikipidiya:Allinmi hamusqaykichik स्वागतम् sc:Agiudu:Benènnidu sco:Wikipedia:Walcome, ane an aw scn:Wikipedia:Bonvinutu sk:Wikipédia:Vitajte vo Wikipédii sl:Wikipedija:Uvod sr:Википедија:Добро дошли sv:Wikipedia:Välkommen till Wikipedia tl:Wikipedia:Maligayang pagdating! roa-tara:Help:Bovègne tt:Википедия:Rəxim it, yaŋa kilüçe uk:Вікіпедія:Ласкаво просимо ur:ویکیپیڈیا:خوش آمدید vi:Wikipedia:Chào mừng người mới đến yi:װיקיפּעדיע:ברוכים הבאים

More Tips for Your User Page/Talk
You can create "Editnotices" for people who are going to edit your page to read. Find out more: Editnotice ∞😃 Target360YT 😃∞ (Talk) 14:13, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
 * You can also put stuff like userboxes, notifications ( Templates such as or  etc. ),  infoboxes, and etc. on top of your user pages.

Cheers and signing off for the day, ∞😃 Target360YT 😃∞ (Talk) 14:23, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Oomerabad. I noticed that when you added the image to the infobox, you added it as a thumbnail. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

SomeImage.jpg

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks! Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 05:00, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 10)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KGirlTrucker81 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Nabeelgm/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KGirlTrucker81huh? what I've been doing 15:49, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Userpage Issues
Hi, after reviewing your userpage, I have found many issues. You cannot add userboxes, topicons, and awards that you do not have; further, you cannot put misleading statements about how many edits you have or other misleading statements. I hope this does not turn you away from Wikipedia. If you have any questions, please leave a comment on my talk page. In veritas (talk) 02:26, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 17)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by In veritas was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Nabeelgm/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

In veritas (talk) 02:26, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kaka Mohammed Oomer


A tag has been placed on Kaka Mohammed Oomer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. RaySingh (talk) 19:36, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

CSS styling in templates
Hello everyone, and sincere apologies if you're getting this message more than once. Just a heads-up that there is currently work on an extension in order to enable CSS styling in templates. Please check the document on mediawiki.org to discuss best storage methods and what we need to avoid with implementation. Thanks, m:User:Melamrawy (WMF), 09:11, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of عمرئ
Hello, Nabeelgm. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, عمرئ, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Timothy Joseph Wood 12:36, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of عمرئ for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article عمرئ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/عمرئ until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Timothy Joseph Wood 12:58, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

April 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Jamia Darussalam. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. AllyD (talk) 10:33, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jamia Darussalam, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. AllyD (talk) 16:08, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017
Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. David. moreno 72   13:00, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add userboxes that you have not earned. If you continue to do so your userpage may be deleted and your account may be indefinitely blocked. Thank-you David. moreno 72    13:22, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Reversion of table formatting
Hi there, I have reverted these edits of yours, because they don't make sense, and they are inconsistent with consensus arrived at through discussion here. Why don't they make sense? Easy to answer: If Raajakumara, Doddmane Hudga, Krantiveera Sangolli Rayanna and Uppi 2 all grossed 40 crore, they should all be in the same rank position. It's not Wikipedia's place to arbitrarily decide that Raajakumara belongs in the #4 spot rather than in the #7 spot. This problem has implications all across the encyclopedia, because often editors will include statements like "the film is the seventh highest-grossing Kannada film". Is that statement true if it could also be the 4th highest-grossing film? Of course not. Organising them into the same ranking prevents us from giving preferential treatment to any one film, and thus, is consistent with our neutral point of view policy. If you don't like the formatting, your recourse is to open a discussion on the article's talk page and seek a new consensus. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:21, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Please stop posting false claims on your user page.
Hi there, please stop posting false claims on your user page. You are not a reviewer, you are not a rollbacker, you are not a Senior Editor III, I doubt that you were adopted by, your userpage has not been vandalised 5 times, your user page has also not been vandalised 9 times, you have not made 44,000+ edits at Wikipedia, you have not made more than 400 edits at Wikipedia, you have not one of the 5000 most active Wikipedians, and you are not #1486 on the list of most active Wikipedians. Another editor has twice before removed false claims. If you do this again, I'll interrupt your editing privileges. That would be a silly thing to be blocked for. Volunteers have other things to do than supervise user page falsehoods. If you want to play around with the templates, use your User:Nabeelgm/sandbox. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:25, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mohit Baghel


The article Mohit Baghel has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non notable actor. Articles for deletion/Mohit Baghel was deleted and other attempts to create this was also deleted as WP:G5. The only reason why I did not CSD this as WP:G4 was because the author has promised to add more references in the talk page, even though my searching does not indicate that there are any better references."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Jupitus Smart  12:24, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mohit Baghel


A tag has been placed on Mohit Baghel, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  Jupitus Smart  12:25, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

July 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Mohit Baghel, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you.  Jupitus Smart  12:58, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Oomerabad, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. David. moreno 72   07:21, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Veeramadevi


The article Veeramadevi has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Does not satisfy WP:NFF"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David. moreno 72   14:15, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gudiyatham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tamil ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Gudiyatham check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Gudiyatham?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Veeramadevi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Veeramadevi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Veeramadevi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PRehse (talk) 15:33, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Viswasam, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you.

Proposed deletion of Viswasam


The article Viswasam has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indication of satisfying WP:NFF"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David. moreno 72   04:31, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Viswasam for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Viswasam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Viswasam until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. David. moreno 72   13:19, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

''Please be aware that per this policy, your signature must contain a link to your userpage or talkpage. If you sign comments in the usual manner this is done automatically. '' Beeblebrox (talk) 20:45, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Userpages
I’ve noticed that you also are asking other users to create their userpage, including an IP user. I have just deleted that talk page as there is no reason to pressure other users into creating userpages, especially IP users as at some point all IPs are re-assigned and a new user could edit from the same IP while having a userpage that has nothing to do with them. Userpages are a tiny part of what Wikipedia is and actually do not do anything to improve the encyclopedia, which is the primary purpose of Wikipedia, so please stop sending such messages or creating userpages for others unless explicitly asked to do so.

I’ve also noticed that you never reply to messages here, I would appreciate some indication that you have read and understood these messages. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:54, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
 * In addition to these observations by, noting your creation of a "Hi I'm Groot!!" userpage for an IP shortly after that IP followed your AfD opinion with a supporting opinion and edit of yours, it is well worth reading WP:SOCK and avoiding such situations in future. AllyD (talk) 09:50, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about P.S Mithran
Hello, Nabeelgm,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether P.S Mithran should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/P.S Mithran.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

SamHolt6 (talk) 13:54, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of P.S. Mithran for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article P.S. Mithran is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/P.S. Mithran until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GSS (talk |c|em ) 03:56, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continuing to pretend to have user rights and authorities you do not have and continuing to mess around with other users’ user pages, and generally just not seeming either willing or able to understand what Wikipedia is and how it works. Also pretty much never replying to messages on your talk page. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:36, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Unblock request
the block is not necessary ,i regret the damage or disruption caused to Wikipedia,

My reason: understand what i have been blocked for will make useful contributions instead. user (talk
 * The block is no longer necessary because i
 * I will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and

Please unblock me... Nabeel Gm 03:16, 6 July 2018 (UTC) Nabeel Gm 03:16, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Nabeel, you may think that copying and pasting cookie-cutter responses prompted from the unblock template will help you be unblocked quicker, but noooo, admins are not usually stupid, and they can usually tell you're just slapping stuff together. If you can't present a cogent argument using your own ability to communicate, you're probably not going to have much luck. If English is not your native language, you might have better luck contributing at the Wikipedia in your native tongue. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:18, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

--UTRSBot (talk) 15:40, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Unblock Request
Hi Administrator ,

Hi
hi I have waited for a long time, I'm willing to contribute to wiki anxiously. How much more time will it take for me to unblock...I won't damage wiki you have my word.... Pls pls.... Unblock me asap... Thanks bro.

Nabeel Gm 14:55, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
 * See multiple administrator comments above. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:46, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Bots Newsletter, August 2018
--UTRSBot (talk) 13:44, 2 October 2018 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 11:16, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Unblock request
@only I don't remember exactly as the block was made almost 3 years ago. When @Beeblebrox blocked me at that time a user was kinda updating false figures to the box office page of Indian cinema. So I had posted request for account deletion on his talk page. At the time I thought it was the right thing. But but again now I know exactly what I have to do and what not to, I don't actually remember other edits that were disruptive to the best of my knowledge and remembrance. If I'm unblocked I'll make sure that edits I make will have a reputable sources which confirm my edits.Cheers


 * Well, if you don't remember what edits/behaviors led to your block, you cannot avoid repeating the same edits/behaviors. Might I suggest that you reread the messages on your talk page? Thanks, -- Deep fried okra  ( talk ) 15:29, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

UTRS 33876
[https://utrs-beta.wmflabs.org/appeal/33876 User has requested unblocing at UTRS. The appeal is now closed.] -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 15:17, 28 August 2020 (UTC) @Deepfriedokra I think I had explained what caused @Beeblebrox to block me, I just said I didn't remember anything else I may have did that caused the block. Thanks for your suggestion. I did recheck my talk page and I didn't really find anything that may be related. Thanks again ! And yeah I was clear on the edits part & I don't really plan on making any big edits. Any minor edits I make will also be sourced properly. If I'm unblocked it's great. If not that's fine too 😊. Thanks for your time.

I'm actually planning on deleting this account and creating another one, to start fresh you know , cheers


 * 1. Accounts can't be deleted. 2. If you create a new account to "start fresh" while this one is still blocked, that account will need to be blocked as a sockpuppet. only (talk) 15:41, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

@Only so I have to get this account unblocked 😓, I just stated everything that happened. Can u reveiew my request again? Thanks. I don't really have anything else to say, I'm not sure what more to do.
 * Like I said above, there's more than just this one incident going on. You'll see further up why you're blocked and will need to explain that.  But based on how this is going, I don't foresee an unblock in your future.  only (talk) 16:00, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

@Only I did read all sections on my talk page, I found I had added user boxes which I didn't own. I believe I had deleted them when the moderator warned me of it. Other than that I didn't find any other vandalizing edits. That I may have made. Thanks again


 * What other accounts have you used? Have you edited in the last three months while logged out? Don't tell us the IP, just yes or no. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 18:36, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

@Deepfriedokra no I haven't made any edits. @Deepfriedokra @Only @Beeblebrox I went through all my talk messages again and found out that I didn't had linked sources to my edits, and I create pages which were nominated for deletion but most of them were found out to be genuine as I provided sources later on. As I said earlier from now on I'll definitely add sources to my edits & I will not create any page without source. Thanks, I have been an active member for 5 long years. Please consider my request to unblock
 * There was also the matter of the use of multiple accounts on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veeramadevi, as warned on 27 January 2018 above. AllyD (talk) 15:18, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

@AllyD I don't think I used multiple accounts. I didn't find any warnings on my talk too.

Problem with your custom signature
You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your preferences are set to interpret your custom signature as wikitext. However, your current custom signature does not contain any wikitext.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.


 * Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:
 * Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
 * Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
 * Remove anything in the text box.  (It might already be empty.)
 * Click the blue "" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)
 * Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:
 * Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
 * Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
 * Click the blue "" button at the bottom of the page.

More information about custom signatures is available at Signatures. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. 19:04, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Kaka Muhammad Umar for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kaka Muhammad Umar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kaka Muhammad Umar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sabeelul hidaya (talk) 12:16, 18 January 2022 (UTC)