User talk:Naberkanka123

May 2020
Hello, I'm Hillelfrei. I noticed that in this edit to Prison rape, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hillelfrei  talk   17:50, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Prison rape, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Hillelfrei  talk   17:52, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Prison rape, you may be blocked from editing. --Stay safe, ◊ PRAHLAD balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 17:53, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Prison rape. ''Do not remove cited information the article to fit your own opinion. Further attempts at doing so will result in a block'' Hillelfrei   talk   17:54, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Spencer T• C 18:45, 24 May 2020 (UTC)