User talk:Nachotacl

August 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Our Lady of Perpetual Exemption has been reverted. Your edit here to Our Lady of Perpetual Exemption was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://pbs.twimg.com/media/CMlJbzeU8AAVJmh.jpg) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 05:40, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: South Dakota THINK Signs (October 3)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:South Dakota THINK Signs and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:South Dakota THINK Signs, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:South_Dakota_THINK_Signs Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AngusWOOF&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:South_Dakota_THINK_Signs reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F ( bark  •  sniff ) 15:36, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Half (of) the year
I'm guessing you're American, a people who use a different version of English from English and Australian people, as I am. I cannot comprehend the American obsession with sticking extra ofs into the language. (I find "off of" particularly gruesome.) I won't revert again, but please be aware that the version of English you use is not the only one, nor is it the English version of English. HiLo48 (talk) 20:51, 28 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you. I know that the change made by JoePhin was grammatically correct. I believed it to be less ambiguous (but honestly only ever so slightly). If you could provide a source that says it is acceptable I would more than happily admit I was wrong apologize for causing all this trouble.

Nachotacl (talk) 00:17, 29 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Not wrong. Just from a different language background. HiLo48 (talk) 01:16, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:South Dakota THINK Signs
Hello, Nachotacl. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:South Dakota THINK Signs, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:53, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:South Dakota THINK Signs


Hello, Nachotacl. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "South Dakota THINK Signs".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:36, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to List of common misconceptions, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 04:21, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Please carefully read the four inclusion criteria for adding an entry to the list, here. Sundayclose (talk) 04:26, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi there. I wont edit war the Common Misconceptions page. But I did believe the source I provided was sufficient to warrant meeting rule #3. Can you please explain why the additional source provided was not sufficient? I believe that source on its own can be considered the topic article for criteria fulfillment. Thanks. Nachotacl (talk) 05:59, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Did you actually read the four inclusion criteria? How did your edit meet criterion 1 ("The topic to which the misconception is related has an article of its own.") and criterion 3 ("The common misconception is mentioned in its topic article with sources.")? "Article" refers to a Wikipedia article. Look at the other entries as examples. Also read just above the inclusion criteria: "It is preferred to propose new items on the talk page first." If you wish to pursue this further, start a discussion on the talk page. Sundayclose (talk) 15:12, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Well it met those criteria for being a misconception reported on in a scholarly article, I did not know article referred to wikipedia. I will add it to the talk page. Nachotacl (talk) 16:42, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

I see what you're saying now about these rules not being met; they are not. I've been too stubborn about shoehorning the entry in and I won't do that. However, if I were to add the misconception with proper citation to the gasoline wikipedia page, would that then make it a valid entry (assuming the information is not removed from that page)? It would satisfy both of these criteria. Nachotacl (talk) 02:36, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
 * If you wish for the related Wikipedia article to be gasoline, the misconception must be discussed in that article, with reliable sources. I'm not sure that discussion of the misconception would remain in that article. Sundayclose (talk) 02:44, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I see. Thank you. Nachotacl (talk) 05:06, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Driveways (Band) (May 13)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Driveways (Band) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Driveways_(Band) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Driveways_(Band) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 17:56, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Driveways (Band)


Hello, Nachotacl. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Driveways".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗ plicit  02:37, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)