User talk:Nad.ooo90

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for helping us build a great free encyclopedia. We have five basic principles, but other than that, we advise that you be bold and edit. If you ever have any questions or need help, feel free to leave a message at the help desk, and other Wikipedia editors will be happy to assist you.
 * Welcome!

Thanks again and congratulations on becoming a Wikipedian!

P.S. New discussion threads for you will appear at the bottom of this page.

Steven D. Waldman
Hello ,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, Steven D. Waldman, may be copied from http://elsevierauthors.com/stevenwaldmanjd/. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 23:42, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Steven D. Waldman


A tag has been placed on Steven D. Waldman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gilderien Chat&#124;List of good deeds 23:54, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Steven D. Waldman, M.D, J.D


A tag has been placed on Steven D. Waldman, M.D, J.D requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Uncletomwood (talk) 04:03, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Status and Advice
Actually, though it does indicate importance, the articles is in large part copied from his page at Elsevier and is thoroly promotional. I have deleted it accordingly. I am quite alarmed that you should actually reintroduce copyright violating material after having been already warned, and do so by using a variant form of the name. You are accordingly being blocked. The subject is notable, but we can tolerate neither promotionalism nor copyvio.  DGG ( talk ) 04:28, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated copyright violation and promotionalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  DGG ( talk ) 04:32, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

You must speak politely next time then i'm not interested if you block me or not but my problem is you haven't explained me the reason that you used to delete the article so i can correct it don't refer me to any article because there i can find 1000 of resons of deletion and what i need is just one ok?

You have been blocked from editing your talkpage due to abuse of the unblock process, continuing to attack editors, or other disruptive reasons. You may still contest any current block by using the unblock ticket request system, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. (✉→ BWilkins ←✎) 15:18, 21 May 2013 (UTC)