User talk:NadineOC

September 2011
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.--John (talk) 19:21, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

John, as the Campaign Director of Fathers 4 Justice myself and the Founder Matt O'Connor are the only people qualified to edit the Wikipedia page. I removed a huge section of content that was outrageously inaccurate and libelous. The page has clearly been hijacked by splinter groups who claimed to be Fathers 4 Justice, who breached our copyright and trademarks and were using our page, riding on the back of our history to promote their activities and they are absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with us. I have also contacted Wikipedia and put them on legal notice regarding the content and I will be re-editing the page. Fathers 4 Justice is registered trademark and has not "closed" as is claimed on the page. NadineOC


 * There is no "ownership" of Wikipedia articles. See Ownership of articles.  Also, see Conflict of interest. NawlinWiki (talk) 12:54, 7 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Also, I just noticed the legal threat in your above comment, and have therefore blocked your account. NawlinWiki (talk) 12:55, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Then how can you possibly expect Wikipedia to be taken seriously when you routinely post inacurate content, libelous content and allow the pages to be hijacked. All we want is an accurate entry and you are failing in that service. NadineOC