User talk:NadirAli/Archive 6

Hindko
Re this: I did ask you for clarification at Talk:Hindko, but you never replied so I assumed the matter was moot. Please explain there what is the problem you see with the sentence. Thanks! – Uanfala 23:38, 5 June 2017 (UTC) , you were supposed to ping me as I am doing now, otherwise I would not know when a response came.--NadirAli نادر علی (talk) 23:39, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Alright, my bad, should have pinged you. And apologies for asking you again, but what is the problem you see with the sentence you removed? – Uanfala 00:10, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

WP Languages or WP Linguistics
Hi, edits like this are problematic for two reasons. First, the article rating and importance are wiped out – you're welcome to update these but please don't remove them. Second, articles about the grammars of individual languages fall under the scope of WP:WikiProject Languages, not WP:WikiProject Linguistics. If you don't want to take my word for it, you can have a look at the articles in Category:Grammars of specific languages. Of the ones that are tagged for either of the two projects, how many are not tagged for WP Languages? Do you see any article that is tagged for WP Linguistics? – Uanfala 20:44, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * , although I disagree, i don't feel it's worth something for me to be caught up on. Replace the tag if you wish then, but also leave in the WikiProject Linguistics tag as topics on grammar and sound systems are subtopics of linguistics.--NadirAli نادر علی (talk) 20:48, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * This is a valid point, but that's simply not how things are done here: WP Languages is the project responsible for any topics that have to do with specific languages. And of course all of them will be related to linguistics in one way or another. If you'd like to change how the two projects divide up the articles between themselves, you can propose that on the project's talk pages. – Uanfala 20:51, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

some talk pages might have languages on them, but most of these seem to have neither tag, however Wikipedia works on the specific topic and study. As a former student of linguistics at university, I can tell you it is the study of grammar. I took English grammar and Romanian grammar was offered under the linguistics program. The study of a grammar is under a linguistics topic, so the tag should be left there.--NadirAli نادر علی (talk) 21:25, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

1RR block
You've been blocked from editing for 24 hours due to violating the 1 revert rule. Please be more careful in the future. El_C 06:52, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Template:Gun control supporter
Template:Gun control supporter, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:Gun control supporter and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Template:Gun control supporter during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:56, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Still there? I thought I can nominated it for deletion.--NadirAli نادر علی (talk) 01:50, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of September 2013 Hudson Bay plane crash for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article September 2013 Hudson Bay plane crash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/September 2013 Hudson Bay plane crash until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 15:50, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Aviation articles
Hi Nadir, Thanks for the C208 article. Unfortunately it is likely to be deleted, though I personally feel that is probably a good candidate. For any future aviation articles you might like to use Template:WPAVIATION creator which will give you laid out templates to easily produce your articles. Happy Editting.--Petebutt (talk) 04:40, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Talkback
AtlasDuane (talk) 10:51, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Talkback
(it's my response to your response) AtlasDuane (talk) 08:25, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

India versus South Asia
You've moved those pages three times now, despite the fact that it's been opposed by three different editors; that's quite disruptive. If you want to change those titles, you'll have to dicuss it. Joshua Jonathan  -  Let's talk!   05:31, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Bronze Age India. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains under way. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. ''Canvassing does not apply here. And IPs cannot move pages. See also, WP:BRD.'' Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 06:17, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Why would he specifically notify a selected group of people (by his own confession on the talk page) rather than anyone? . Something to think about.--NadirAli نادر علی (talk) 08:00, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

WP:ARE report
There's a complaint filed against you, see:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. Capitals00 (talk) 06:47, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#NadirAli
At Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement:

please move all your comments and responses under your own section.

Thank you !

Sagecandor (talk) 01:05, 3 July 2017 (UTC)