User talk:Naerii/Archive

Hello
You OK? --Dweller (talk) 15:59, 3 September 2008 (UTC) Check out User talk:Naerii/me. Couldn't work out if I should or should not delete it. --Dweller (talk) 16:26, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Yep! I'm great, thanks. Just tidying up my userspace. It feels nice to get rid of all the junk I created some time ago with well-meaning plans to use for something, and then forgot about and abandoned. I'm a bit obsessive about keeping things 'neat'.  naerii  16:03, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I see now it included a transclusion of a page you'd requested deletion of and that's why it was showing at CAT:CSD. I've left it. --Dweller (talk) 16:32, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Suggestions
Some suggestions for you: and feel free to feel patronised. After all, I am patronising.


 * WP:ER Though perhaps not if you think you're already well aware of some things you can/should put right. I see you're currently not an admin. If you do post to ER, make it clear whether you are or are not or aren't sure if you want to run for admin soon. It'll give people a steer and stop them assuming.
 * WP:REQUEST Enough stuff there for an army of eager beavers.
 * WP:WIKIPROJECT Join one. Or more than one.
 * User:SuggestBot/Requests Genius.
 * WP:ADOPT Hug a newbie.
 * WP:WELCOME Smother a newbie. (Joke)
 * WP:TWINKLE Add it. It makes life soooo much easier. And makes vandal-fighting great fun. (OK, I admit, I'm a saddo) (Doesn't work very well on Internet Explorer)

Is that enough for now? --Dweller (talk) 16:38, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Awesome ;) WP:REQUEST led me to WikiProject Albums/List which has enough to keep me busy for a while. I do vandal fighting sometimes but it bores me to death. Looking into the other stuff now.  naerii  17:43, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

RfA thanks
--SmashvilleBONK! 23:06, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Gawd, now look what you've gone and done
You've made me waste even more bandwidth! --Dweller (talk) 10:52, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I can't help it if you're just that awesome. Looks good. You might want to add WP:GAN - they always have a massive backlog there and frequently it's easier to find something constructive to say about articles that pop up there than the finely-formed masterpieces that are at FAC.  naerii  16:31, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Oh and incidentally
while I'm filling up your user talk, which aspect of Q8 did you not like? I presume it was pt2. --Dweller (talk) 15:25, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I actually had a bit of a discussion w/ Useight about weighting comments some time ago (it's here).  Whilst i dont necessarily agree with all of that still now (or at least, i dont care as much), most of it still stands.   I'm pretty much against this whole 'discretion' thing which is IMO vague, ambiguous and unfair on candidates and voters.   'crats rarely if ever come out and say which votes they've discounted, and a lot of the time it's pot luck depending on who closes the nomination. It's really inconsistent, you know? What one 'crat might think is a totally ridiculous reason to oppose might just seem reasonable to another 'crat. And where one 'crat might promote a 69%, another might fail it. So by extension I had to oppose you because you're inconsistency in yourself - I don't see how it's fair to promote 67% and not 69%, or at least, not without a detailed rationale. And I especially felt that the concerns presented in Krimpet's RFA were reasonable enough to not be discounted. Just my £0.01 (accounting for exchange rates) anyway.
 * I would kind of prefer a system where 'crats closed RFAs by noting on the talk page each and every vote they'd discounted, and why, and then a bot promoted or failed according to whether it was above 75% or not after votes had been discounted. It'll never happen, but hey, I can dream, right? That was kind of longer than I intended. I hope it made sense.  naerii  17:24, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

My RFA
Thanks for voting on my RFA, although it was unsuccessful, I do appreciate the feedback; I’m glad that you’re actually happy that I took a wikibreak :) (that might be the only person who’s said that to me, and I do believe the wikibreak helped me a lot, so I appreciate the fact that you agree). I hope to see you around the wiki! Thanks again!-- daniel folsom  02:51, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Support the Muse WikiProject!
Hey, I see you have made a number of edits on Muse-related articles. Well, I am inviting you to support the proposal for a Muse WikiProject and if it is accepted we can help make Wikipedia the best place for Muse info! Thanks, hope you are interested, just sign your name and leave a comment if you wish under the Support section here! Andre666 (talk) 06:05, 11 September 2008 (UTC)