User talk:Nafnosseb


 * }

Hi Nafnosseb, thank you for your interest in Wikipedia! Unfortunately the information you added to the Leo Namibia article is not suitable for an encyclopedia, and I have reverted it. The guideline for this is WP:NOTHOWTO. Please don't feel bad about my revert. Maybe you want to look around a bit first to get an impression of what content Wikipedia normally displays? You may contact me any time at my talk page should you have further questions. Best regards, Pgallert (talk) 11:51, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Non-notable Big Bang Theory ref
Your third attempt to add this material to the 2001 article has been reverted because of the notability problem, and other issues with the references you provided, which were all pointed out to you two months ago here and here. Consensus was achieved against inclusion of this material then, and you chose not to engage whatsoever in discussion about it. Do not add this material again without consensus or a very good argument that proves notability from reliable sources. See WP:N, WP:RS, WP:V, and WP:IPC for clarification of what qualifies as "notable", and what kind of refs to use. Shirt waist &#9742;  00:07, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

July 2011
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on 2001: A Space Odyssey (film). Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. MarnetteD | Talk 00:44, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * Declaring in your edit summary that you intend to edit war over this rather than discussing it on the talk page is likely to bring about a block sooner rather than later. Wikipedia operates by WP:CONSENSUS and you should read the information there before proceeding. MarnetteD | Talk 00:44, 7 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Not to mention you seem to be missing the point that no one is all is challenging the accuracy of the information. It's the notability of it that is at issue. You need a secondary source to establish cultural significance per WP:IPC and that source must in turn fit the somewhat strict criterion of WP:RELIABLE. You seem to be only giving a cursory glance at the talk page discussion.--WickerGuy (talk) 04:08, 7 July 2011 (UTC)