User talk:Nagachua

Nagachua, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure

Saroja Devi
Your addition to B. Saroja Devi has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. Please don't copy-paste content directly from other sources such as rediff.com. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. utcursch &#124; talk 04:24, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Most of the lines which you have removed have no connection with Rediff article. Most of the other senetences which were removed by you are very important facts about her career. You have been taking just too interest in this article and reverting. Stop vandalizing the article by removing the important lines about her career. Nagachua (talk) 19:05, 31 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Please take some time to read Policies and guidelines. Wikipedia is not a fansite. The article had been tagged for multiple issues since 2012 -- you simply restored the content from this version, without fixing any of the issues.
 * Much of the content you've restored is unsourced. (e.g. "147 films as box office success of these 161 as the main female lead", "the most popular being Thirudathey, Thai Sollai Thattathey"). Please read WP:BURDEN:
 * "The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material [...] Any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed and **should not be restored without an inline citation** to a reliable source.".
 * Many of the references are not reliable sources (e.g. "iluvcinema.com", "ovguide.com" etc.) In fact, some of these plagiarize content from Wikipedia, and are not allowed as references per WP:CIRCULAR (e.g. iluvcinema entry is dated 2015, and has exactly copied content from 2014 version of Wikipedia).
 * Many of the references are dead links (e.g. "chitramala.com", thesundayindia.com)
 * Much of the content is unencyclopedic POV (e.g. "her eyes enacted a magical drama", "mincing accent, smart and perky attitude" - copied from rediff.com).


 * If you believe that "important lines about her career" need to be added to the article, add those lines with proper sources that are not dead links or Wikipedia mirrors. Don't simply copy-paste sentences from the previous version that had been tagged for multiple issues.


 * And as I've already mentioned, there are very clear copyright violations from other websites like rediff.com. (E.g. "He would patiently tie on her salangais, often massaging swollen feet after her dancing stints", "energetic performance as a patriotic queen raging against" etc.)
 * If you restore these sentences that have been copied verbatim from other websites, you will be blocked for copyright violations. utcursch &#124; talk 23:07, 31 October 2015 (UTC)