User talk:Nagelfar

{| cellpadding="7" cellspacing="4" style="width: 100%; background-color: #444444; border: 4px solid #777777; vertical-align: top; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 23px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 23px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 23px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 23px;"
 * colspan="2" style="padding: 0;" |
 * style="width: 90%; background-color: #999999; border: 4px solid #333333; border-right-width:4px; border-bottom-width:4px; vertical-align: top; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 23px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 23px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 23px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 23px;" rowspan="3" |
 * style="width: 90%; background-color: #999999; border: 4px solid #333333; border-right-width:4px; border-bottom-width:4px; vertical-align: top; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 23px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 23px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 23px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 23px;" rowspan="3" |

Survey Invitation
Hi there, I am a research student from the National University of Singapore and I wish to invite you to do an online survey about Wikipedia. To compensate you for your time, I am offering a reward of USD$10, either to you or as a donation to the Wikimedia Foundation. For more information, please go to the research home page. Thank you. --WikiInquirer 10:54, 3 March 2007 (UTC)talk to me

Award for a damn fine userpage

 * Thank you. It doesn't conform to every resolution and you have to scroll vertically at some lower ones, but at least it doesn't realign improperly. Nagelfar (talk) 02:32, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Cool userpage!
I'm sorry, this was the only barnstar I could find.


 * Thanks. Quite a bit of recognition in a short time on that page all of a sudden. Nagelfar (talk) 20:56, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Actual Idealism page
Nagelfar,

You seem to know something about actual idealism. Any chance you might be able to hammer some of the article's more obfuscatory sentences into something meaningful?

Tcamps42 (talk) 07:32, 12 June 2008 (UTC)


 * I've looked it over several times, and I feel if I alter it at all with the way I understand his philosophy, it would now come out even more convoluted. Maybe you could give me particular parts which appear difficult to you. Nagelfar (talk) 09:19, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Cocaine analogues
Hi Nagelfer. I have made quite a few pages for various cocaine analogues already as you may have noticed! However bear in mind that there are hundreds, perhaps up to several thousand compounds described in the literature that can be considered cocaine analogues (i.e. aryltropane / arylpiperidine derivatives acting as monoamine reuptake inhibitors), and I do not think that all of these compounds are sufficiently notable to deserve their own wikipedia page. Perhaps at some stage it might be nice to flesh out that Phenyltropanes page again into an SAR review of the series, similar to how Nuklear wrote it originally but in more appropriate "wiki-style", however I don't really have the time or patience for a big project like that at the moment. I prefer to just make lots of stubs for interesting compounds providing a brief summary of what is known about them, which can then be expanded at a later date. With regard to cocaine analogues, I tend to only make pages for compounds that have at least been given code numbers if not actual names, and that have at least a couple of references showing their use in scientific research. Only five or so cocaine analogues have actually been reported to be used recreationally as "research chemicals" so far (CPT, CFT, RTI-55, RTI-121 and pFBT) and my feeling is that if a compound is not being used recreationally, is not being used in scientific research, and was not considered important enough even by the people who invented it to be given a code number or name, then it is not notable enough to deserve a page of its own. Meodipt (talk) 00:52, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Oh yeah also whats the code for the "This user perceives the wikipedia project as a kind of natural self-fulfilling Akashic records." userbox as I would like to put it onto my userpage! Meodipt (talk) 00:56, 4 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Ok I made pages for a couple of representative examples of the oxacyclic and carbacyclic DAT inhibitors developed by Organix. There are heaps of other compounds in the series of course, but those two at least have a couple of publications that mention them, and anyone who then goes off and reads the references provided in the articles will quickly realise that there is a wide range of other analogues that are known. Meodipt (talk) 04:17, 12 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Right, thank you those do nicely in the way of at least having examples of that series of chemicals. Nagelfar (talk) 04:37, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

(1R,2R,3S,5S)-Methyl 3-((2-acetoxybenzoyl)oxy)-8-methyl-8-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octane-2-carboxylate

is correct name. i put it into CD and it recognized the structure.

had to sign in anomalously because been banned from this website many times.--80.42.42.87 (talk) 21:50, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Hg IJK
Note that (as might be inferred from its name) Hg IJK is an ancestor group of Hg K, not a descendent.

IJK should appear in the tree above Hg IJ and Hg K, not below Hg K. (Compare the ISOGG tree) Jheald (talk) 18:43, 6 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Right you are. I must still be sleepy. Hope I didn't edit too many pages with misinformation. That should have been an intuitive fact. Nagelfar (talk) 18:48, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Marinetti
You wrote, "In 1938, when Adolf Hitler included creations of Futurism in an exhibition deriding what Nazi propaganda called degenerate art, Marinetti persuaded Mussolini not to allow the exhibition entrance into Italy." But according to the list of works in the Degenerate Art article, the exhibition contained no creations of Futurism. Correction, please. Marshall46 (talk) 13:25, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Second to final paragraph.. Nagelfar (talk) 21:03, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Ibogaine/18-MC
Hi there. Well it seems you are correct - now I check some references (CNS Drug Reviews 1999;5(1)27-42, European Journal of Pharmacology 2004;492:159–167) it seems that 18-MC does retain some affinity for both μ and κ receptors, indeed it only has around 2x selectivity for α3β4 over μ which is far less selective than I had thought. I was aware that ibogaine is an opioid agonist at pharmacologically relevant doses seeing as opioid side effects are often seen in treatment, and have resulted in death when heroin was coadministered, but my impression was that 18-MC was much more selective for α3β4. Actually it seems that the main difference with 18-MC is to reduce sodium channel binding, σ agonist and NMDA antagonist effects, but the μ and κ affinity is not reduced nearly as much. So I guess it can go on the opioids template if you like :-) Meodipt (talk) 21:58, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Yeah I agree we should look at the other ibogamine derivatives, I've been meaning to make pages for more of them but the problem is that there is not much information available. Certainly noribogaine, voacangine and coronaridine, as well as those synthetic 18-MC congeners, have been shown to produce anti-addictive effects in animals which presumably means they all act as α3β4 antagonists. However whether they have opioid affinity is unclear, I simply haven't been able to find much evidence one way or the other. Noribogaine certainly does have opioid effects as its assayed in that CNS Drug Reviews paper and found to have higher affinity at both μ and κ than either ibogaine or 18-MC, but voacangine and coronaridine just haven't been assayed so far as I can find. The 18-MC congeners are more potent and seem to be more selective for α3β4 than 18-MC itself but that doesn't mean they're entirely devoid of opioid affinity as well. I'd say add noribogaine and 18-MC to the opioids template seeing as those have both been shown to be opioid agonists, but hold off on the others unless we can find some binding data for them. Meodipt (talk) 06:13, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Userpage
In Firefox 3 I can't click on any regular monobook links (side links and top tabs) from your userpage as File:Sphere halve greyscale.png is on top of everything. –OrangeDog (talk • edits) 19:26, 19 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm aware, it is on purpose. Use the tab function to switch between active hyperlinks if you must, but I use that to prevent such activity. Nagelfar (talk) 04:35, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

modern Chinese cosmology
I saw your comment about the USSR cosmotheory, and I was wondering if there was anything parrallel in modern PRC? --Gary123 (talk) 22:56, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * My apologies for overlooking your comment from earlier, I do not know the answer to your question, but I do not believe so: the PRC diverged from the USSR on quite a number of controversial topics. Nagelfar (talk) 17:26, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Macro-haplogroup NOP rs2033003
I got it from the 23andMe SNPsOnChips spreadsheet http://www.webalice.it/asquecco/Y_DNA-Forums.zip This is of course a major revision of the Y tree. I would suppose that NOP* would show up as one of the odd minor K branches out there, of which there are several. Any way to convince Thomas Krahn to test some of these for it? My guess is that S and M cluster together, given the geography, but there are unusual Ks in other places in Eurasia. -ted —Preceding unsigned comment added by Archaeogenetics (talk • contribs) 01:55, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

The Walk Through the Y-Chromosome Project
Hi, I saw you ask about this over on the discussion section for the Family Tree DNA article. Now that the WTY is live See Here you might want to take a look. --RebekahThorn (talk) 06:20, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

File:HimmlerScroll.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:HimmlerScroll.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:01, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Call for opinion on a neutrality accusation in a human genetics related article
As a fellow member of the WikiProject HGH may I ask for opinions on this accusation?--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 12:04, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Anatolian bump


The article Anatolian bump has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * There are no reliable sources that give this more than a passing reference.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fences &amp;  Windows  02:26, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

cocaine
Hi -- I've provisionally reverted your edit. The information you added is so complex and specific that it absolutely needs sourcing -- I'm quite open to having the information in the article if it is supported by a proper source. (I have no idea why you gave a picture of the molecule as a ref.) Also, please remember not to mark edits as "minor" if they make significant changes to the article content. Regards, Looie496 (talk) 18:06, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Masonna Logo.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading File:Masonna Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 04:58, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Eraserheadposter.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Eraserheadposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:24, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello
I noticed your contribution to ol Hesiod's arche. I wonder if you are interested in the Eastern interpretation of the arche? In specific how it as a pagan concept of consciousness or nous, demiurge, dyad, duality, is expressed by in logicism as the finiteness or incompleteness in contrast to the arche or uncreated. LoveMonkey (talk) 15:36, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
 * By 'eastern' do you mean Greek or Slavic 'eastern occidental', (as in eastern orthodox) or Asian interpretations of the term? I am interested but am not greatly erudite on the matter. Thanks for noticing; best regards. Nagelfar (talk) 23:36, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Eduard von Hartmann.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Eduard von Hartmann.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 17:27, 3 January 2011 (UTC)


 * That current image is not the one I originally uploaded. Though the copyright rational was that the image was over one hundred years old. Nagelfar (talk) 02:46, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Corded_Ware_culture
Please see my comment at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Corded_Ware_culture&action=edit&section=11 Barefact (talk) 08:42, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Colt buntline special.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Colt buntline special.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. B (talk) 01:43, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
 Ron h jones (Talk) 20:44, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

November 2011
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Monoacetylmorphine a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Beloved Freak  20:57, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Came to basically say the same thing. No worries, though, everything's fixed now. Thanks for keeping an eye out for mis-named articles, and don't be afraid to keep being bold in your changes. =) That said, feel free to let us know over at requested moves if you ever need assistance with any weird moves like this, so that we can easily maintain the page history during the moves. =) -- slakr  \ talk / 21:06, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Pseudomorphine.gif
Hi there

Thanks for uploading this image.

Perhaps you can upload it at a higher resolution, and as a PNG rather than as a GIF? PNGs have less compression artifacts than GIFs. Also, you can upload them to commons.wikimedia.org, where they can be shared with all the other wikiprojects.

You can take a look at Manual_of_Style/Chemistry/Structure_drawing as well. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 18:06, 18 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Honestly I don't have much to work with on my end in that capacity, but I certainly am not adversed to others taking up my slack in that area. I apologize for the not appropriately thorough nature of my contributions, but contributions they are nonetheless. Nagelfar (talk) 19:28, 18 November 2011 (UTC)


 * I would like to second Rifleman. File:Morphine Numbered Position.jpg for example does not have an sufficient quality (JPG compression artefacts). Please replace it with a SVG or high resolution PNG and upload this file to Commons. --Leyo 12:42, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
 * One reason for the low quality there was because it may have been simply scanned or copy&pasted from an article in a journal. I've deleted File:Cocaine positions numbered alternate.png as a blatant copyright/license violation on those grounds and think File:Isothiocyanatobenzoylecgonine methyl ester.png that got transfered to commons is in the same category. Nagelfar, please don't do that (and *especially* don't claim that an image such as that is your own work). Please let us know ASAP if there are any others you have uploaded that are not actually drawn by you so we can make sure to remain in licensing compliance. DMacks (talk) 21:24, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I altered those images, are they not free under PD-chem? Mind you; I am running on software from 2002 Nagelfar (talk) 23:19, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Taking a non-free image and editing it is creating what's called a "derivative work", and is generally no "freer" (and sometimes even less-so) than the original. It's fine to redo from scratch and wind up with something that looks pretty close or even nearly identical, especially if it's just representing simple facts of structure (facts aren't protected), but I think any specific representation of facts that starts as someone else's is tainted by their licensing restrictions. DMacks (talk) 06:27, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Do take a look at the structure drawing guide, there are some suggestions for software. ChemSketch is free for personal use, and that's what I use. BKChem is open source as well. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 05:02, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
 * An alternative would be to post a request on WikiProject Chemistry/Image Request. --Leyo 08:23, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Please upload your free media to Commons!
Thank you for uploading free images/media to Wikipedia! As you may know, there is another Wikimedia Foundation project called Wikimedia Commons, a central media repository for all free media. In the future, please upload media there instead (see m:Help:Unified login). That way, all of the other language Wikipedias can use them too, as well as our many sister projects. This will also allow our visitors to search for, view and use our media in one central location. If you wish to move previous uploads to Commons, see Moving images to the Commons (you may view previous uploads by going to your user contributions on the left and choosing the 'file' namespace from the drop down box (or see ). Please note that non-free content, such as images claimed as fair use, cannot be uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons. Help us spread the word about Commons by informing other users, and please continue uploading! :Jay8g Hi!- I am... -What I do... WASH- BRIDGE- WPWA - MFIC- WPIM 00:31, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Morphine Numbered Position.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Morphine Numbered Position.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 23:21, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Pseudomorphine.gif listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pseudomorphine.gif, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Leyo 12:16, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Cocaine Stereoisomers.PNG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cocaine Stereoisomers.PNG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Leyo 07:14, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:SolmaniaDLOguitar.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:SolmaniaDLOguitar.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:00, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Bauplan der Wewelsburg.gif
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Bauplan der Wewelsburg.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:15, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Re: Translation of 95 year old philosophy.
It sounds like an interesting project; I'm actually surprised it hasn't been translated already, although Gentile's involvement with fascism always hindered his popularity. I've been inactive for a long time due to my job taking up a lot of my time and denying me internet access, and I'm still not sure how much I'd be able to contribute, but I'd be glad to help in my spare time. Let me know the additional details, i.e. which subsection you'd like me to start with or where to upload the work. Cheers. --Εξαίρετος (msg) 19:06, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for letting me know: the project sounds really interesting! But I'm not sure I'm the right person for this. I am an Italian mother tongue translator, so the rule-of-thumb would be for me to translate only into Italian (I could do the opposite, but to get a decent final translation it would then require some editing I suspect). Anyway, I could help with any questions you might have on the original text: being almost 100 years old, seems to me that the language is a bit tricky. --Kiabara (talk) 08:03, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

This appears to be a huge job, and at this point I don't feel I could give it the attention or time necessary. Skier Dude ( talk ) 05:09, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Interesting idea. I'm an ESL speaker (native Italian), so I'm pretty much in the same predicament as Kiabara. That being said, two questions:
 * 1) Is there a transcribed copy available in Italian of this book? I think that would be the first step in adding value to Wikipedia (i.e., transcribing into Wikisource)
 * 2) After this is taken care of, we would be able to break the job down into more manageable units, which could later be harmonized / proofed.

Thoughts? Paolo (talk) 19:53, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Not transcribed, but a proper program could probably get a very accurate Italian rip from the *.PDF file. This project still greatly interests me and if you have any way forward thought out or able to take advantage of please get back in contact with me and I will assist in any way possible to me. Nagelfar (talk) 02:03, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Sorry... because of school i hadn't read your message. Are you still translating Sistema di logica come teoria del conoscere? if you want i could help you now ;) --Massa90 (talk) 08:38, 24 December 2012 (UTC)


 * I have yet to begin or know where to start. It would be a major project and I am only familiar with the philosophy as to how I could contribute, not the Italian language. If you could help me with assembling an affluent Italian speaking team who has interest, I'd be much appreciative. This is on the ground floor as to right now, though it is a top priority as to what I'd like to help as a contribution to both the world of anglophone philosophy and the Italian culture of philosophy and its much needed & neglected appreciation by the English speaking world. Nagelfar (talk) 03:13, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Your interpretation of the ancient planetary symbols...
... Is faultless, convincing, knowledgeable, simple, elegant, and impressive. Thank you

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Classical_planets_in_Western_alchemy&oldid=130630180

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.65.53.37 (talk) 21:23, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

File:TriskelionValknut.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:TriskelionValknut.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:28, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Masonna.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Masonna.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 08:05, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Larbrovalknut.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Larbrovalknut.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 12:37, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Xauxaz listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Xauxaz. Since you had some involvement with the Xauxaz redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. JZCL 11:34, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Nuklear
Per WP:REVERTBAN my reversion is permitted and indeed encouraged. You have every right to restore the content, but now you own it. But my revert was 100% OK. Nuklear has a long history of cluttering up articles with random syntheses and was quite abusive when he was still socking under usernames. See Sockpuppet_investigations/Nuklear/Archive ; that is just a small part of the picture. He edits under IP addresses now and it is not worth creating new SPI cases for all of them. Like I said, you own any of my reversions that you restore. That's all - have a great day. (btw, it is hard to read black on grey!)  Jytdog (talk) 18:26, 4 March 2015 (UTC)


 * That's fine by me. To be honest, I asked Nuklear to help me (I was unaware that he was banned, he started his 'sister page' to the one I started and am currently editing twenty two months after mine (I started mine Dec. 10th 2007, he created his as almost a carbon copy of my original in Sept. 2009) and his grew exponentially faster because of his diligence. All the edits by him on either of these two pages which I have ever noticed are fair use, no copyvio and accurate in terms of content. Feel free to revert anything he adds as per your rights within the lines of Wikipedia policy since he is banned. But if I think it's worth while I will continue to include it. But this is all done in good faith. My regards. Nagelfar (talk) 18:36, 4 March 2015 (UTC)


 * thanks for your reply! Nuklear is actually a sad case - there are private details i'm aware of, but what i'll say is that i don't think WP is a healthy thing for him.  you can email me if you want to understand better. Jytdog (talk) 18:57, 4 March 2015 (UTC)


 * How would I go about contacting you by e-mail? Nagelfar (talk) 01:11, 5 March 2015 (UTC)


 * oh~ if you go to my userpage, and look in the way-left margin under "tools"  you will see "email this user"  - lots of people have that enabled.  :) Jytdog (talk) 01:28, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
 * That doesn't show up for me, using Firefox 34.0.5, I just see:

"Tools"

What links here Related changes User contributions Logs Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information

...and that's all. Nagelfar (talk) 18:29, 5 March 2015 (UTC)


 * oh interesting! I just looked in preferences, where you can enable this feature or not. It says " You also need to provide an email address if you wish to enable the "Email this User" feature to either send or receive emails via Wikipedia. Your email address is not revealed when other users contact you."   I am guessing you cannot see it, as you don't have that enabled on your account.  in any case my email is my username at gmail.  Jytdog (talk) 18:43, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

C2-Acetoxycocaine
Hi Nagelfar. You recently created the page C2-Acetoxycocaine as a redirect to itself. I assume that this was an error, so I'm letting you know so that you can edit the page to redirect it wherever it was supposed to go. Thank you! —Granger (talk · contribs) 14:13, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you, yes, it was supposed to go to 2′-Acetoxycocaine. I applaud your vigilance and effort to inform me. Nagelfar (talk) 17:28, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 3-(dimethylamino)-2,2-dimethyl-1-phenylpropan-1-one, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Effective dose. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

3-(dimethylamino)-2,2-dimethyl-1-phenylpropan-1-one
Hey, that's a good article you posted. I never knew about this compound previously only just found out today. Seems interesting thinking about getting a custom synth done at some point not sure yet which compound to order. The problem is as soon as they see it has some kind of cash impetus they would try to illegalize it.--89.240.141.59 (talk) 09:59, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes someone brought it to my attention from a forum I frequent which has a lot of people interested in "grey market" pharmaceuticals. . Regards, Nagelfar (talk) 22:54, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Apparently only tested for it's opioid activity, some pretty erudite individuals at my aforementioned forum postulated that it's oxygen and nitrogen could interact in a near-minimum energy state which also given it dopamine reuptake inhibition properties. Nagelfar (talk) 23:02, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of cocaine analogues, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Efflux. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Intended. Both links @ disambig. page fit specific meaning. Nagelfar (talk) 21:42, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

More equal listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect More equal. Since you had some involvement with the More equal redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ( talk ) 21:54, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

R-18 553
Could you please explain R-18 553? You can post the explanation at the redirect's talk page or here. Thanks, Oiyarbepsy (talk) 01:22, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
 * As per http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4611432 "Loperamide (R 18 553), a novel type of antidiarrheal agent. (1974)" Nagelfar (talk) 01:40, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Your help desk question
You look like you've been around a while, but if you're trying to propose something new that involves a software change or a feature, I think WP:VPT is where you would go.— Vchimpanzee  •  talk  •  contributions  •  18:31, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
 * (member since 2002, and user since year zero) I think I did there, doesn't seem to be noticed where-ever I place it, though. Nagelfar (talk) 18:38, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (CM156) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating CM156, Nagelfar!

Wikipedia editor Blackhat999 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Looks good so far."

To reply, leave a comment on Blackhat999's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Thank you for your service (MPH analogues)
I only mean that partially tongue-in-cheek; you've done great work. I would love to pick your brain sometime regarding the substitutions we may see in possible future grey-market releases of MPH analogues. Would love to get your opinion, if you have one, on the possibility of detrimental health effects of the current grey-market F-substitution.

Great work!!!!


 * F-substitution as in F para(meta)-fluoro? I think of fluoxetine in regard to that with its para-tri-fluoro that increases serotonin reuptake inhibition relative to DA re-uptake modulation, where the additional-benzene length makes an SDRI rather than the amphetamine-esque skeleton of the SSRI that maintains VMAT releaser functionality. Nagelfar (talk) 07:05, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

7-hydroxymitragynine and beta-prodine?
Hi, can you elaborate on the connection between 7-hydroxymitraynine and beta-prodine? Thanks! Kevin143 (talk) 06:01, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Joaquin Xirau Palau


The article Joaquin Xirau Palau has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: Little indication of WP:ANYBIO notability. Most sources are Wikipedia mirrors. Google search

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Dr Strauss   talk   21:12, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Quinotaur.jpg


The file File:Quinotaur.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ejaculation Generater.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Ejaculation Generater.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Inner Mind Mystique Vinyl.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Inner Mind Mystique Vinyl.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Inner Mind Mystique.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Inner Mind Mystique.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:32, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Killer Bug


A tag has been placed on Killer Bug requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.   Ravenswing     16:52, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Killer Bug


A tag has been placed on Killer Bug requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Atlantic306 (talk) 20:50, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Morgellons
You cite two sources for your opening sentence on the Morgellons entry. I don’t find them particularly credible or compelling evidence to support this entry’s themes. There are other, more recent sources published in peer reviewed medical journals that contradict this outdated perception. The most recent research published in 2018 as well as this year by Middleveen et al is actually credible and worthy of consideration. This entry is quite simply inaccurate. If you’d be so kind to unlock this for editing, I’d appreciate it. CrystalClearMM (talk) 23:09, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I was unaware that it was locked. My account doesn't show as such, but I am currently using a mobile device. If this issue persists contact help, I'll try checking again. Nagelfar (talk) 01:55, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * user:fish and karate is the one listed as having added the protection. I was just the last edit. I'd contact that user. _Nagelfar (talk) 02:10, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

"Echoic" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Echoic&redirect=no Echoic] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. fgnievinski (talk) 05:27, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bauplan der Wewelsburg.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Bauplan der Wewelsburg.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 12 August 2023 (UTC)