User talk:Nageljac09


 * }

Mentor note - Grassroots lobbying
Hello Jaclyn, and Welcome to Wikipedia! I have agreed to become the mentor for your group. I see you are planning to write about Grassroots lobbying. Let me know when you need any sort of assistance, and I will be glad to help. I will be usually online from 11:30 AM GMT to 5:00 PM GMT. If you cannot find me online, feel free to drop me a message on my talk page, or else you can send me an e-mail. Hope you have an enjoyable time here! Regards,  The Mi ke •Leave me a message! 05:45, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Hello Jaclyn

If you are having troubles for grasping the subject or finding the right materials we can organize a lab session to get your article development going. Please consider signing up for a lab session either with me or Dr. Obar.

Best Elifyilmaz (talk) 05:52, 4 April 2011 (UTC)Elifyilmaz

Great job!
Saw the new additions to the grassroots article. Excellent work. Jaobar (talk) 00:24, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wiki-Project Management!
Hello Jaclyn,

As Dr Obar, probably mentioned I am one of the two Campus Ambassadors for your class - hopefully I will be able to come in person and say hello but till then, I wanted to say welcome to the class and feel free to ask me any questions you may have. Chris/Epistemophiliac (talk) 17:33, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of TechSmith
Hello! Your submission of TechSmith at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:38, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of TechSmith
Hello! Your submission of TechSmith at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Ishtar456 (talk) 17:15, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Interview
Hi Jaclyn, sure, I'm happy to help. My Skype ID is "ElonkaD", feel free to add me, and then we can communicate that way to find a mutually convenient time for an interview? --Elonka 03:54, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Interview -gn
HI, got your request for an interview I'm available until after tuesday looking at the time difference I'm at UTC+8 which means I'm 12 hours ahead of you please email me for skype user name and when to arrange interview time thank Gnangarra 23:30, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Responsibilities of an Admin
A tag has been placed on Responsibilities of an Admin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Moreover, please add more verifiable sources, not only 3rd party sources. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Rorshacma (talk) 15:58, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Previous Issues/Cases
A tag has been placed on Previous Issues/Cases, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Moreover, please add more verifiable sources, not only 3rd party sources. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Rorshacma (talk) 15:59, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of General Rules &
A tag has been placed on General Rules &, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Moreover, please add more verifiable sources, not only 3rd party sources. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Rorshacma (talk) 15:59, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Pages tagged for deletion
I'm wondering if these are supposed to be subpages of your userpage, rather than stand alone articles? If this is the case, contact me at my userpage and I'll resurrect them for you and either you can move them, or I'll move them for you if you can't do it yet. So long as you're not setting out to wreck the place, most of us are quite friendly and don't mind being asked for help. (Getting the answer right may be a different matter sometimes...) 8-) Peridon (talk) 16:28, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Thank you! These were going to be subpages and i believe we made new ones that are sub pages. Sorry about creating those pages, thanks for the speedy deletions! Nageljac09 (talk) 17:48, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
 * One little word of warning there - Wikipedia accounts are for individuals, so I assume that the other part of 'we' was just advising you rather than editing... Peridon (talk) 17:52, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Yes I did not mean more than one person was using this account. Thanks for the tip though! If i have any questions in creating these pages, would i be able to direct them to you? Nageljac09 (talk) 17:56, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Peridon, Nageljac09 is part of a class in WP:USEP, so "we" probably meant his/her peers :) . Nageljac, you may ask questions to any user whom you trust and who you think can answer your query; just be bold and ask!  Lynch 7  18:02, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Fair enough - I used the 'add' button and didn't read the first part of this page. Always willing to give what help I can - or to pass things I can't answer on to people who can (and whom I trust). Peridon (talk) 18:45, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Interactions with Users


A tag has been placed on Interactions with Users requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. JoelWhy (talk) 18:20, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Other Related Material


A tag has been placed on Other Related Material requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. JoelWhy (talk) 18:20, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Inappropriate
I have moved How to Become an Admin to User:Nageljac09/sandbox. This was completely inappropriate for the (article) namespace. (And is probably completely redundant to material already present in the Wikipedia: namespace.) &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:20, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

If you create a mistake article, request its deletion with db-author. Please also study this edit carefully. What does "fixing vandalism then later rollback" mean? &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:47, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
 * As mentioned above on my talk page, I did not mean to create those pages. I am new to Wikipedia and I apologize for creating those. Thanks. Nageljac09 (talk) 20:40, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

This is a work in progress for a class project and that page has yet to be edited. I promise you that it is nowhere near completed or revised. I would appreciate and encourage any feedback during this process. The goal of those pages are to gather Administrator information in one location that is easy to understand and easy to navigate. Like I said, it is in the beginning stages of formatting but I would like your and any other active Wiki user/admins feedback. That sentence, for example, is something that I need to ask my group about. That and plenty of other things will need to be changed I'm sure. Nageljac09 (talk) 21:04, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia Education Program Student Survey
Hi! Please take a few minutes to fill out this survey about the Wikipedia Education Program. This is our opportunity to improve the program and resources we provide students, so your feedback and input is integral to our future success. Thank you so much! JMathewson (WMF) (talk) 20:40, 21 May 2012 (UTC)