User talk:Nagledogg

Speedy deletion of Bottle cap flicking
A tag has been placed on Bottle cap flicking, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Wikipedia is not a how-to guide. Article is also vanity-heavy.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Dynaflow  babble  07:05, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

November 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to History of writing, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: History of writing was changed by Nagledogg (c) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2007-11-15T23:58:08+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot 23:58, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. bikeable (talk) 00:00, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

April 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Simon Hill, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Simon Hill was changed by Nagledogg (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-04-01T21:36:51+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 01:37, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Simon Hill constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks.  κaτaʟ aveno TC 01:42, 2 April 2008 (UTC))

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to 2004 Summer Olympics. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.  κaτaʟ aveno TC 01:49, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Haydn sawtell
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Haydn sawtell, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Haydn sawtell seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Haydn sawtell, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 02:00, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Scotty Boy Jenner
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Scotty Boy Jenner, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. AnyPerson (talk) 03:24, 30 January 2009 (UTC)