User talk:Nahrizuladib

BIIJ
As the editor of this journal, you have a conflict of interest. That doesn't mean that you cannot edit this article. I created an article about the journal that I myself edit, too (Genes, Brain and Behavior). Have a look at it. It is very important to use neutral, non-promotional language to avoid such an article to be deleted. I think your current edits are unproductive compared to the cleanup up version that I had made, which even contained a reference to the Malaysian Star. As you may see from the AfD discussion, I am trying to save this article. What really would help would be an independent confirmation that the journal has been included in WoS or PubMed. Your Twitter feed just is not enough for that. For guidelines concerning journal notability see WP:Notability (academic journals). Hope this helps. Happy editing! --Crusio (talk) 23:35, 7 December 2009 (UTC) PS: why do you insist on using lowercase "biij" instead of "BIIJ", which is more usual? And you realize that this will not the PubMed abbreviation, I guess. --Crusio (talk) 23:36, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi again. It is customary to respond on another users talk page to make sure that user sees your response. However, you can also use the "watchlist" feature and put somebody's talkpage on your watchlist. Whenever there is a change to a watchlisted page, this will be indicated if you click the "my watchlist" link in the upper right hand corner. To answer your other questions, it is of course completely acceptable to copy whatever text or style you want from the Genes, Brain and Behavior article. However, it might not be a bad idea to revert the article to where it was after I edited it. That version contained all useful info, was stripped of any promotional language, and (very important in Wikipedia) was done by an editor without any vested interest in the journal. (Some of the other sources that came up later can be added to that version, of course). At this point it is not yet clear how the AfD will end and a more neutral, cleaner version of the article might help. Finally, as you may have seen, the guideline for notability for academic journals is currently debated rather hotly, so it is probably better for now not to refer to it too much... :-( --Crusio (talk) 12:01, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * There is no problem with you voting in the AfD, but it would be good to disclose that you are the editor. Also, it is not a good idea to bring up arguments like "there are other less notable journals that have an article". See WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS... Thanks for bringing that (rather horrific) Iraqi journal article to my attention. I have cut it back drastically and may propose it for deletion myself... --Crusio (talk) 15:27, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * You can restore older versions, for instance, by making a "diff": go to the history page and mark the date of the last version that you want to restore, then mark the latest version, and then click "compare selected versions". On the new screen you will see a link "undo", clicking this will restore an older version. --Crusio (talk) 15:47, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:PSPB.gif
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:PSPB.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 02:43, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Journal of the Norwegian Medical Association
I expanded Journal of the Norwegian Medical Association, and I think that the article now demonstrates the notability of the journal. Could you please take another look at the article and the comments at the AfD? -- Eastmain (talk) 04:14, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * You can't remove the AfD tag yourself, but you can comment at the AfD that you would like to withdraw the nomination, and an admin will take care of closing the AfD. - Eastmain (talk) 14:12, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Diabetes care journal logo.gif
 Thanks for uploading File:Diabetes care journal logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:15, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo-health-service-journal.png
Thanks for uploading File:Logo-health-service-journal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:PSPB.gif
Thanks for uploading File:PSPB.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:41, 30 April 2020 (UTC)