User talk:NailPuppy

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! -- Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 02:06, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Tom Slemen Article
Hello, I have noticed that you agree with the addition of the 'controversey' section on Tom Slemens article - or at least can see no fault in it. I am aware that the protection on the page should have come down last night but has not, I do not know why. The page was protected because of a 'dispute' but there has been ample time for any objector to argue their case yet non have come forward. The lack of any clear objection surely means that there is no dispute and any edit to the article to remove the section should now count as vandalism. Due to the fact that two editors (you and myself) have stated in favour of the section and no-one has stated against it would it be possible to claim concensus and have the section re-instated? You seem much more clued up than me on Wikipedia policy and I thank you in advance for your contribution. Rjm (talk) 10:25, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm actually pretty new to editing as well. I saw that you spoke to User:NonvocalScream about it on his talk page and he mentions the multiple source thing.  While the controversy was restored with two sources, the one that directs to forums simply redirects to the icnetwork one.  Sorry, but there isn't much I can do for you on this one.  I mainly just revert vandalism and try to give a thought here and there when it seems right.  Good luck.  NailPuppy (talk) 11:02, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Robbie Hummel Article
NailPuppy, I thought my contribution was pretty helpful and insightful. I've heard dozens of accounts that Robbie's high-pitched squeal of a cry was uncanny in its similarity to Oprah Winfrey's. Why don't you go out the real world and clean up real vandalism on local businesses, apartment complexes, etc.? Sound this out backwards for me: k-c-i-d-y-m-k-c-u-s!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benjamin2840 (talk • contribs) 23:33, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)