User talk:Nailcain

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n! 20:42, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019
Hello, I'm CaptainEek. Your recent edit to the page Chemotherapy appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You reading of the source was incorrect  Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n! 20:43, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Chemotherapy, you may be blocked from editing. OfficialBoob (talk) 22:31, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Callingg something vandalism because your opinion disagrees with it does not make it so. Nailcain (talk) 17:37, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Chemotherapy. ''Your edits to chemotherapy have been non-neutral, and clearly factually incorrect. The article you cite says that sharks could give us clues as how to fight cancer, but does not say that shark DNA is a cure for cancer or that cancer has been cured.'' Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n! 18:19, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Chemotherapy
Hi Nailcain! Welcome to Wikipedia. I saw that your edits to Chemotherapy have been reverted a few times (once by me) and wanted to try to clarify the reasons for that.

First and most importantly, Wikipedia has a guideline on identifying reliable sources for medical articles, which you can read at Identifying reliable sources (medicine). It has a section on popular press sources (such as articles on the BBC website) which explains that "The popular press is generally not a reliable source for scientific and medical information in articles" and that "A news article should therefore not be used as a sole source for a medical fact or figure." It's worth giving the whole section a read.

Secondly, editors have also expressed concern that your edits have misrepresented the claims made in the source. Whereas your edits have claimed that "great white shark DNA is capable of curing [cancer]", the source says "Great white sharks may hold the secrets to curing cancer and other age-related diseases" and "Scientists hope more research could help apply the findings to treating age-related illnesses in humans." While it's acceptable to paraphrase sources and cut out extraneous information, it's important to make sure that we're not saying things that go beyond what's in the source.

Finally, it might be worth asking whether information on the possible cancer-curative power of great white sharks belongs in an article about chemotherapy. Wouldn't it be better in the Great white shark article or the Cancer research article? Of course, if you were to add the same claims to those articles the first two points would still be an issue – but the first step to adding content to the encyclopaedia is often finding the right place to add it.

More generally, Wikipedia works on the basis of consensus, achieved through discussion and debate. It's almost always better to engage in discussion on an article's talk page (in this case Talk:Chemotherapy) than to engage in edit warring. I hope this clears things up a bit – feel free to let me know here or at my talk page if you have any questions. All the best, – Arms & Hearts (talk) 21:20, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- ferret (talk) 02:00, 24 February 2019 (UTC)