User talk:Nairspecht/Archive 2

What I have done is more articulated the article, using reports came in reliable and leading sources, that's very common in wikipedia. The existing report in the box office section can't be regarded as a "neutral" source as it is a claim from producer. The Manorama report is odd and it's not adaquate for a neutral verification. That's why we articulated the most relevant reports regarding the subject in a neutral manner.
 * Agreed they are reliable sources, but since you say the claim is from a producer, things change. It should come from an official Mollywood box office reporter, and I don't think there is one. So, it would need more sources to add that type of data. Plus, you address yourself as we, why is that? And I suggest you sign your replies, please. Cheers! Nairspecht (talk) 08:10, 1 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Pls review the addition once more, they were the facts based on various reports. Commonly subjective claims are not used to be regarded as "neutral" in wikipedia. The manorama report, which seems like subjective, also includes in my addition. Better check it with an administrator.Rashghunzraj blazt (talk) 1 January 2016 (UTC)


 * You may start a discussion on the film's talk page and see what others have to say about it. Nairspecht (talk) 08:36, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Edit of List of Malayalam films of 2016
@Nairspecht - Firstly please do not delete entries made without getting concurrence from the original contributor. There are two movies by the name Marupuram - one released in 1990 and the other in 2016. Please see http://msidb.org/movies.php?tag=Search&movie=marupuram&sl=1&limit=6&alimit=3
 * - As a fellow Wikipedian I have all the right to remove data if it is inappropriate or if it is wrong information. However, I admit the edit was wrong. Since you have added a reference, it looks good. Nairspecht (talk) 15:24, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * @Nairspecht - Yes, if the data is inappropriate or if it is wrong information, you possibly can edit it, but ONLY if you have enough evidence to show that it is inappropriate or wrong. Simply based on your belief or perception, you just cannot do it. The original entry that you deleted was taken from one of the most authentic Malayalam movie-based databases, and the link was included already. You should have checked that link first, before attempting to delete it. I too am not new to Wiki - so I am well aware of the guidelines.
 * The reason behind me removing the data was because it was linking to the 1990 film. I agree I failed to check the reference, which was my mistake so I am sorry; and the discussion ends there. Most authentic database? Says who? I don't care neither does Wikipedia whether a website is regarded by some users to be the most authentic. You say you are well aware of the guidelines yet you fail to sign your posts. Since the post has been reverted and I have apologized for it, I think it will be better if we stop it here. Have a great day. Nairspecht (talk) 17:39, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

@Nairspecht - Hello - I'm Surabhy here. You'd added Jacobinte Swargarajyam as a release for tomorrow March 18. It is actually a film to be released in April. Please ensure that you check the release date from an authentic source before adding it to the list if released films. Cheers! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Surabhy (talk • contribs) 15:05, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * @Surabhy - Sure. The source was right, but the film was postponed.  Nair sp ec ht ''' (talk) 15:11, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Adi Kapyare Kootamani 2


The article Adi Kapyare Kootamani 2 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Too early to create an article about a proposed or announced/rumoured film with production not yet started.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Charles Turing (talk) 18:25, 15 January 2016 (UTC)