User talk:Nakon/archive2

'This is an archived page. Please do not edit this page. If you are currently in a discussion on this page, please continue it on the main page.'

Thanks
Thanks for reverting vandalism on my userpage. --TantalumT e lluride 01:20, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Sure, no problem. -- Nacon Kantari  e |t||c|m 02:08, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Thank you!
For our kind support of my Rfa, which passed. If you should ever have any complaints about my admin actions, please let me know. Also, should you ever need my help with anything, please do not hesitate to ask! Thanks again! All the best  Ban  e  z  17:06, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Edits to my user page
Wow, thanks for catching the edit to my user page so quickly! The guy in question Afinley, is a coworker who was just messing with me! Andrew73 21:37, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Edits to mine too
Cheers for catching this one asap. Budgiekiller 22:37, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Desuetude
Please read the article at Desuetude. Someone has appended several paragraphs of material that is quite irrelevant. The material does not define the meaning of desuetude, but rather repeatedly misuses the word in a series of comments made with a distinct, non-neutral political point of view.

Rather than reverting my changes and labelling them vandalism, please read the discussion I posted or read the actual material and see for yourself that it is inappropriate. This is not really a judgement call - it is plainly wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.139.71.69 (talk • contribs)
 * OK, but next time please be sure to use an edit summary next time before removing part of an article. -- Nacon Kantari   e |t||c|m 23:57, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Ah, sorry, 'twas my first ever edit and I didn't even see the "edit summary" box. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.139.71.69 (talk • contribs)

User Page Vandalism
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user page. Fightindaman 02:30, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Sure, no problem. -- Nacon Kantari  e |t||c|m 02:30, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism
Thanks for the rv of vandalism on my userpage. Just wanted to let you know that it is appreciated! --Bugturd Talk 12:31, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

My RFA
Hi, thanks for participating in my RfA discussion. Unfortunately, my fellow Wikipedians have decided at this time that I am not suitable to take on this additional responsibility, as the RfA failed with a result of 66/27/5 (71.0% support). If you voted in support of my request, thank you! If you decided to oppose me at this time, then I hope that if I do choose to reapply in the future, the effort I will make in the meantime to improve and expand my contributions to Wikipedia may persuade you to reconsider your position. All the best, Proto t c 15:29, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

dear dude
if i want to add real definisitons tha include the word penis or vagina why am i blocked from doing so ?

there is no definition for any of these words on your site and i feel that they are important to the public

Benis

Bunt

Fupa

thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.130.165.100 (talk • contribs)
 * These words are nonsense and do not belong on Wikipedia. Please read WP:NOT  -- Nacon Kantari   e |t||c|m 02:26, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Abbopa
Naconkantari, User:Abbopa has vandalized more pages, namely Additive, CIBU-FM, Westphalian language and some of their talk pages. Since you have previously placed a warning on his talk page, and I do not know how to handle these situations (beyond reverting), I would appreciate if you could take the next step. Thank you very much; if you can explain to me what to do in such situations, please let me know. (I read Vandalism and a lot of other pages but could not quite understand ... sorry). Boris Alexeev 04:47, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I would be happy to help. The appropriate way is to place a warning on the user's talk page, usually by adding  or  .  If they continue to vandalise Wikipedia, the next step is to list them at WP:AIV.  This will bring the matter to the attention of an administrator, and they will take the appropriate action.  Thanks -- Nacon Kantari   e |t||c|m 04:53, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

RfA Thanks!
Okay, this is perhaps a bit overdue, but thank-you for your support in my recent RfA! I passed with a final vote count consensus of (82/1/0), which was a lot of support that I really appreciate. I'll try to live up to the expectations; and on that note, if there's ever something I do wrong (or don't do right), please spit in my general direction. Cheers! --P e ruvianLlama(spit) 05:31, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

You may not link to tinyurl
Did you notice that tinyurl has been blocked from wikipedia? Do you stand up for this? 68.223.43.236 04:37, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Please do not blank pages without first discussing the changes on the talk page. Thanks. -- Nacon Kantari  e |t||c|m 04:39, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

thanks
I know you probably get this all the time, but thanks a lot for reverting vandalism on my user page.--Alhutch 05:51, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Requests for adminship/Femto
At Requests for adminship/Femto I wrote "over the past 6 months" in my nomination, but I made a mistake and should have written "over the past year and 6 months". I apologize for my mistake. --unforgettableid | talk to me 06:38, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Tony Binns
This text is original. If you read the biography at Sussex University fully, you will find that it bears no resemblance to the article I wrote, and is, in fact, outdated. If you had allowed me to complete the article, you would have found this out!Helzagood 21:53, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

From the website: "Among his appointments outside the University of Sussex, Tony was Honorary Secretary of The Geographical Association (1985-89), its first elected President (1994-95), Honorary Vice-President (1997-2002) and Chair of the Association's International Committee (1999-present). He was also Chair of the Institute of British Geographers, Higher Education Study Group (1988-93). Since 1995, he has been a Director and Council member of Worldaware, a development education organisation, and a member of the Editorial Board of the Journal of Geography in Higher Education. He is also editor of the Routledge Perspectives on Development series. In 2001 he was elected President of the Geographical Field Group."

From your edit: "Among his appointments outside the university, Tony was Honorary Secretary of The Geographical Association (1985-89), its first elected President (1994-95), Honorary Vice-President (1997-2002) and Chair of the Association's International Committee (1999-2004). He was also Chair of the Institute of British Geographers, Higher Education Study Group (1988-93). Since 1995, he has been a Director and Council member of Worldaware, a development education organisation, and a member of the Editorial Board of the Journal of Geography in Higher Education. He is also editor of the Routledge Perspectives on Development series. In 2001, he was elected President of the Geographical Field Group, and was recently elected Honorary Secretary (2005-8) of the Commonwealth Geographical Bureau."

While the entire article may not be copied exactly from the website, this part looks like an exact copy, save for a few omissions. -- Nacon Kantari  e |t||c|m 21:59, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

Well, I didn't even look at that site when I was writing the article, so either it is a coicidence, or there is indeed only one way of writing the same thing(!), I shall, nevertheless try to re-word it to make you happy, but I have honestly not copied it!!Helzagood 22:03, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I am going to assume good faith and cease reverting edits made to the article. I would like to ask, however, for you to consider revising parts of the article so that they do not seem like a copy-and-paste from other websites, as other editors may see the article as a copyright infringement and remove it. Thanks, -- Nacon Kantari   e |t||c|m 22:09, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

Thank-you Helzagood 22:31, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

Seventh Day Baptist Church-Vandalism
Someone vandalized the Seventh Day Baptist article by wrecking the external links and probably to the article itself.Is there something you can do?Thank youRFD 23:14, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I have reverted the edit. If this IP address continues to vandalise articles, I will report it to an administrator. Thanks, -- Nacon Kantari   e |t||c|m 23:18, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

Many thanks!!!RFD 23:23, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

My RFA
Hey, Naconkantari, I wanted to thank you for your support of my (unfortunately unsuccessful) request for adminship. The final tally was 37/16/5, which fell short of the needed 75-80% for "consensus". I don't know if or when I'll go up for nomination again, but even if I don't, I will try not to betray the trust that you and 36 others were willing to place in me. Thanks for having faith in me... and happy editing!  Matt Yeager   ♫  ( Talk? ) 00:09, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

Unprotecting fantasy football (american)
Hello,

I notice you unprotected the Fantasy Football (American) article, and as I expected, someone has already tried adding his/her link to the site. Editing it will just result in the edit wars that have been ongoing over the past few months, which is why I think the article should stay protected. --Blahblah44 06:10, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I am not an administrator, so I can not unprotect pages. The unprotection was done by an administrator who left the tag on the article.  I removed the tag, since the article was not protected.

Joke's RfA
Hi Naconkantari, thanks for voting in my (successful) RfA. All the voters who voted neutral or oppose had the same criticism – lack of involvement in the Wikipedia namespace. This is nice, because it is a weakness that I can endeavor to fix. Although I don't think I have the disposition or diligence to be actively involved with, say, VfD, I've recently started to participate in the Featured Article discussions and will start participating in some policy discussions now that I am starting to grasp the way the project runs. –Joke 16:48, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

RFA
Hi, just wanted to thank you for voting on my RFA, which went through with a count of (58/0/1), far better than I'd expected. I intend to take things slowly and start using the extra abilities gradually, but if there's anything I can do just leave a message. Cheers, CTOAGN (talk) 13:54, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

Sorry about that
OK, I know, I know- It is probably common knowledge that Mars has a population of 0. I probably shouldn't have added that in Template:Planet Infobox/Mars. But, one day, there may be people that live on mars, but Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, so I shouldnt've added that. Yet.

Although, there may be people who (believe it or not) do not know that. I once heard a statistic (which I'm not sure wasn't made up) that 50% of the american populace knows that Earth circles around the sun and it takes a year to do it.

68.64.175.222 00:39, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

AFD
I saw. Ardenn 01:06, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Thankyou!!!
Hi Naconkantari, please consider my words. I would like to tell you that I think you are great. --Abbopa 02:26, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

My RfA
Thank you for your support on my request for adminship. It ultimately succeeded with votes of 52/1/2, so I am now an administrator. Should you have any questions, comments, complaints, or requests at any point in the future, please do not hesitate to let me know on my talk page or via e-mail. — bbatsell  ¿?  04:56, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Adminship Vote
I want to sincerely thank you for voting on my adminship nomination. Whenever I mess up, please let me know. I want to learn from my mistakes so they don't become patterns. Superm401 - Talk 05:12, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

My penis has a number of magic powers that it uses to fight evil super villians
RE: The reason you gave for deletion

WP:BITE.

Thank-you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.136.61.186 (talk • contribs)
 * The reason I marked this as CSD G3 was because of a penis vandal that was recently on Wikipedia. -- Nacon Kantari  e |t||c|m 23:25, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

SPUI
I saw you reverted and then unreverted. My fault; I should have left an edit summary. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 23:35, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Pro-Test
Thanks a lot for helping to keep the spate of vandalism under control. It seems some people will stop at nothing when tryint to discredit people. --ProTestOxford 03:12, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

vandalism apologies
Sorry for incorrectly re-reverting your revert to Jacques Marquette. I apologize for my clumsiness and want to reiterate that I did not do it as an act of vandalism. Regards, Blnguyen 01:57, 10 February 2006 (UTC).
 * That's ok, I've had that problem happen to me before. -- Nacon Kantari  e |t||c|m 01:58, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

3RR Notice
How can you talk to a non-registered member? I can’t talk to him. Redd Dragon 02:25, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * What do you mean? I don't think that the page is protected, so if you want to leave a message the user's talk page, just click on the "edit" link.  If for some reason you are unable to edit the talk page, I can relay the messages there for you. -- Nacon Kantari   e |t||c|m 02:28, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

When I click on his IP it just shows me what he has edited. There is no discussion or edit button. I just added the comment into the Howard Stern Show discussion: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Howard_Stern#The_Friday_Show

The problem is he has misinformation and keeps reverting me. Not the other way around. The Friday Show is not a regular schedule; it falls under vacation time for the show which is not included. Redd Dragon 02:34, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * It looks like the IP editor has left. His talk page is available at User talk:68.236.39.17. -- Nacon Kantari   e |t||c|m 02:37, 10 February 2006 (UTC)


 * thanks, added comment there. Redd Dragon 02:50, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

88.111.11.186 02:47, 10 February 2006 (UTC) gives in!
Okay, I'm being followed. It's good to see security is still up to scratch. All it takes is the phrase Pelican Shit and everybody starts jumping around her. You should never have advertised that vandalizer in the first place, and it just gives people ideas. Anyway, all the best and have a peaceful time. 88.111.11.186 02:47, 10 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Actually, can you just block me as I'm tired and want to go to bed. Please, I'm being serious. You'd be doing me a favour. 88.111.11.186 02:58, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Jimbo Medal
I hereby award you the jimbo medal for your reverts of vandalism on User:Jimbo Wales practicaly faster than anyone else can react. -- Cool CatTalk 03:54, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Didn't know that there was one of those... Thanks! -- Nacon Kantari  e |t||c|m 03:56, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

61.69.12.20
has vandalized again since your last warning a few minutes ago. Please block this IP. -- King of Hearts | (talk) 04:11, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm not an administrator, so I can't block users. It seems like this vandal has stopped for now, but if it starts again, please list it at WP:AIV. -- Nacon Kantari   e |t||c|m 13:19, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Userpage vandalism
Thansk for reverting, I hope I never have cause to return the favour :-) - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] 19:56, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for reverting vandalism on my userpage. --Jorvik 21:05, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Sure, no problem -- Nacon Kantari  e |t||c|m 21:05, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Sorry
O.K. I won't vandalize anymore pages! 68.96.23.7 22:13, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

You Rock
I've seen your work all over Wikipedia and I must say, you rock! --User:Lord_Chess

Esteffect
I know it looked like vandalism, but User:Hedley had himself renamed User:Esteffect and is indeed an admin. NoSeptember  talk  23:52, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks.  Nacon Kantari   e |t||c|m 23:53, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

Image:Sidney sheldon.jpg
Hi, I see that you are doing a fine work removing all the images without copyright tag. I found one for you! &mdash; PM Poon 00:23, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for reverting my user page of it's vandalism. It's been getting more frequent as of late. :-( S W D 3 1 6  talk to me 03:28, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Sure, no problem. Nacon Kantari   e |t||c|m 03:29, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Counter Vandalism Unit
You do an excellent job in reverting vandalism. You might be interested in joining the Counter Vandalism Unit! :) --Ixfd64 04:46, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks, but I am already a member. Nacon Kantari   e |t||c|m 14:52, 12 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Awesome! However, you might want to put a CVU user box on your user page! :) --Ixfd64 04:22, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * No thanks, I'm trying to stay away from the whole userbox thing. Nacon Kantari   e |t||c|m 04:22, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Another Esperanzial note...
Hi again Esperanzians! Well, since our last frolic in the realms of news, the Advisory Council has met twice more (see WP:ESP/ACM2 and WP:ESP/ACM3). As a result, the charter has been ammended twice (see here for details) and all of the shortcuts have been standardised (see the summary for more details). Also of note is the Valentines ball that will take place in the Esperanza IRC channel on the 14th of February (tomorrow). It will start at 6pm UTC and go on until everyone's had enough! I hope to see you all there! Also, the spamlist has been dissolved - all Esperanzians will now recieve this update "newsletter".

The other major notice I need to tell you about is the upcoming Esperanza Advisory Council Elections. These will take place from 12:00 UTC on February 20th to 11:59 UTC on February 27th. The official handing-over will take place the following day. Candidates are able to volunteer any time before the 20th, so long as they are already listed on the members list. Anyone currently listed on the memberlist can vote. In a change since last time, if you have already been a member of the leadership, you may run again. Due to the neutrality precident, I will not vote for anyone.

Yours, as ever, Esperanzially,

--Cel es tianpower háblame 09:00, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

(message delivered by FireFox using AWB on Celestianpower's behalf)

Thanks
Thanks for taking the time to vote in my RfA, which passed with a final vote of 54/2/1 despite my obvious inadequacy for the job. I'll do my level best to use the mop and bucket — or, as I said in my RfA, plunger — responsibly. Of course, in the best tradition of politicans everywhere, I've already broken a campaign promise (I blocked a vandal last night despite having said "I don't anticipate using the blocking tool very often"). Nevertheless, I'll try not to let the unbridled power corrupt me. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 14:56, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Happy Valentine's day!
  Happy Valentine's Day, my sweet dear NaconK!  Phædriel 

Just Another Thanks
I know you hear this all the time, but THANK YOU! for reverting vandalism. --Dark Magician

Thank you
Hello Naconkantari, thank you for you support in my RfA. I was promoted with a final count of 48/1/0! If you see me making any mistakes, let me know ASAP. -- WB 02:20, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Shining Time Station
Hello, I am confused about this article since you, I, and an anon user decided to edit this article at around the same time. Let me try to explain what happened. I reverted the page back to an obviously better revision. Then, I tried to fix the episode listings for Season 1. However, the anon user changed all the "Thomas stories" in Season 1 to "Oliver Owns Up". So, thinking this was true, I added that info to my second edit of this page and clicked "Save Page". In the meantime, you reverted the incorrect info of this anon user. So, I apologise for unknowingly re-putting the incorrect info on the page. If you do not change it then I will tomorrow or so; you don't have to since it's technically my fault. It happens... anyway have a great day. EdGl 03:46, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Big Spring, Texas
I've filed a 3RR report on the POV-pusher (the second POV report I've filed on that IP, the third for that article). In the meantime, I've exhausted my revert limit within the 24-hour span, and 65.122.236.133 currently has the last work (fifth or sixth revert). Would you mind stepping in with a revert? The next time I drive across the country I'll have to swing through Big Spring to see what all the hub-bub is about. Thanks,  OhNo itsJamie Talk 03:55, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but I don't want to get involved in a revert war. Please try to get the anon to discuss changes on the talk page.  Nacon Kantari   e |t||c|m 04:00, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

WP:RFA/Quarl
Hi Naconkantari, thanks for your support in my RFA, which succeeded. If I can ever improve or help in any way, please let me know! :) —Quarl (talk) 2006-02-16 11:28Z 

thanks for your help
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my page Ry4nolson 17:36, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

What?
Sorry, I didnt mean to vandalise. I thought it was something else. Like, I thought you erase the thing and then write it. &mdash;The preceding unsigned comment was added by Suspect Zero (talk &bull; contribs).
 * The warning was for this. Nacon Kantari   e |t||c|m 20:48, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Well, ban me. I dont care. I use Suspedia more often anyway. But considering I use a proxy network, I'll keep on signing up with new accounts. AIM - ItsWesYo
 * I'm not an administrator, so I can't ban editors, but take note that if you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, you will be blocked by someone. Nacon Kantari   e |t||c|m 20:56, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

?
Why can I not s-protect my Talk page? Can you help me to? User: Larsinio keeps editing my page and is REALLY harassing me. I need help. -Ellg73


 * Only an administrator can protect or semiprotect pages. Nacon Kantari   e |t||c|m 00:08, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

User and talk page
Thanks for reverting. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 06:40, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Thank you!
Thank you very much for your support during my recent Admin election, I appreciate the trust that you have put in me. Please contact me if you have any questions, comments or concerns regarding my work as an admin.

Kind Regards, Elf-friend 08:06, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Facedisplayer
I've been butting heads with this guy for two days now. I see you're trying to help. The Pax Romana (music) article was previously Speedied but I don't know how to find out when. This guy's sole purpose is to promote himself and his band. I'm trying to find out what I as a user (about a month now) can do in situations like this. I'm trying to learn how to get people to play nice and what to do when they don't. Maybe if I can figure all this out I'll have admin aspirations by summer. Until then I just want to help out when I see a problem like this. Guidance? — Bill W. (Talk) (Contrib) –  February 18, 2006, 03:28 (UTC)
 * You can check when the article was deleted and the reason by searching the logs. The article currently falls under CSD A7, because it does not assert how the band is notable.  If the editor disagrees, you can send the article to Articles for deletion, and the Wikipedia community will decide what to do with the article.   Nacon Kantari   e |t||c|m 03:31, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, now the page is gone again (Yay!), but searching the logs still doesn't show it. Anyway, sorry if I was unclear in my earlier post, but I do understand the normal deletion processes.  I had even searched the logs for the article prior to writing here.  My main question here (which I seem to have successfully obfuscated) was about how to handle the user.  I couldn't find an appropriate warning to give him regarding the repeated vandalism of the Pax Romana page.  So, regarding the user, what's the right thing to do? — Bill W. (Talk) (Contrib)  –  February 18, 2006, 04:07 (UTC)
 * The right thing to do would to be to just ask him to stop, without using a template. Tell him that the band's entry does not follow Wikipedia's band notability guidelines and that he should consider recreating the page when they do.  Nacon Kantari   e |t||c|m 04:09, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for reverting vandalism to my user page! Mushroom (Talk) 04:24, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

My RfA
Hi. On behalf of my right eye, I'd like to thank you for giving me your support on my recent RfA. It ended with a final tally of (73/2/2) and therefore I have been installed as an administrator now, and I'm ready to serve Wikipedians all over the world with my newly acquired mop and bucket. If you have any questions, do not hestitate to forward them to my talkpage. Once again, thanks for your support.  Soothing R  20:32, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

Petition
Hi, I was just wondering if you would like to sign this petition. It's a petition for getting the original voice actors back for the Sonic games (instead of the Sonic X voice actors). 71.105.13.135 01:23, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * No thanks, I don't really care for online petitions. Nacon Kantari   e |t||c|m 03:25, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Okay, but if you ever change your mind, don't hesistate to sign it. --71.118.80.208 00:50, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

?-?
You are asking me something, I didn't ask you anything. I will do what you've requested, but I'm just asking you to read and pay attention, after your request.

--Cacumer 04:07, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

thanks
thanks for your help in dealing with NickelbackFan's vandalism. I blocked him for 24 hours. keep up the good work :-) Alhutch 04:09, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Gastrich
It looks like Gastrich created User:Narconcantari to use as a sock. I bring this to your attention since you may want to get this User name deleted or permanently blocked. David D. (Talk) 04:13, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks, it's already been taken care of. Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 04:13, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for removing vandalism from my user page. Cheers. PJM 05:20, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Just a note about User talk:Kerrysfrench-sockpuppet
True to his name, he is a sockpuppet, but he's not the first sockpuppet. See also: Kerrysfrench (the original account), Kerryisfrench (sockpuppet), and KerrysMexican (second sockpuppet). He only hits Green Day pages, and is being watched by both Alhutch and I. Next time he vandalizes, just place a notice on the AIAV, and he'll be blocked, just mention his past sockpuppetry =) Kareeser|Talk! 19:01, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * User:Kerrysfrench-sockpuppet has been indef blocked by User:Curps. block log. Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 19:05, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user page. C HAIRBOY (☎) 15:41, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

My RfA
Thank you for your support of my request for adminship. I'm delighted that the RfA ultimately succeeded with a final consensus of 52/1/0, so I am now an administrator. If you ever have any comments regarding my editing, or I can help you at any point in the future, please feel free to leave a message on my talk page. Again, thank you! └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 11:04, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Naconkantari Guy keeps Editing Saw 3
I keep trying to delete this guys edits on the Saw 3 page, he keeps posting false actors on purpose and then goes to IMDB and tells everyone about it. Lock the Saw 3 page or somthing.
 * I am not an administrator, so I can not lock the page from editing. It is more effective, however, to block single editors from editing a page than protecting the page from editing by everyone.  If the user continues to vandalise the page, he will be blocked in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy.  Thanks  Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 22:10, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

My User Page
Thanks for watching my user page. I blanked it without being logged in. But rest assured I meant to. I have logged in and re-blanked it under my own name. 205.143.222.10 22:09, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Ok, no problem. Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 22:10, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Thank you
I checked my watchlist and saw that you reverted vandalism to my userpage. Thank you very much, I appreciate it.-- Dakota ~   °  23:22, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Me too! Seems you're quite adept at this, looking at this page. Thanks! Flowerparty ■ 23:49, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * And mine as well. Thanks! VegaDark 00:26, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Rfa
 Tv316 would like to nominate you to be an administrator. Please visit Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact Tv316 to accept or decline the nomination. A page has been created for your nomination at Requests for adminship/Naconkantari 2. If you accept the nomination, you must formally state your acceptance and answer the questions on that page. Once you have answered the questions, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so.
 * Thanks for nominating me, but I am going to have to decline. I've seen plenty of good administrator's RFAs fail because they have not waited the customary three months before pursuing nomination.  If you'd like to renominate me, I'd be most appreciative anytime after March 13.  Thanks  Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 00:34, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I was not previously aware of the three month rule, but will keep that in mind from now on. I will most definately renominate you in March if someone doesn't beat me to it. tv316 00:37, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * You could count me as a supporter as well. Keep up the good work, and thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page! Hamster Sandwich 18:26, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

User Page
dang, ur fast with that revert and. thnx for keepin an eye out :) Joe I  02:16, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Grobanites
Hello. I noticed that you added the tag to this article without comment. I have moved it, therefore, into AfD. I invite you to comment on the article's AfD page. Thanks! James084 02:58, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

More anti-vandalism thanks
Sorry to be boring, but this is yet another thank-you for your sterling work in reverting vandalism, including on my own user page. I spent a bit of time trying to revert vandalism last night and you beat me nearly every time - man, you are fast! Thanks again and keep up the good work. Waggers 10:51, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism incorrect reversion
Hi, I noticed that both in microcomputer and minicomputer, you attempted to revert vandalism, but had not reverted back far enough, reverting instead to an earlier (but still vandalised) version. Subsequent vandalism was then reverted to the (NOT) "fixed" version.

Since many people would have assumed that the vandalism had been fixed correctly, and would have checked the diffs based on subsequent versions, it's therefore possible that the first vandalism could have slipped through and remained unnoticed until someone re-read the entire article.

Therefore, please use the history list and ensure that where the vandal has made two or more edits in a row that you revert to the version *before* they started editing. It would also be advisable to ensure that previous reversions have been done correctly.

Fourohfour 11:18, 22 February 2006 (UTC)


 * BTW, sorry if this came across as being overly critical or patronising. I appreciate your efforts in fighting vandalism, and it's not like I'm perfect myself :-/ Fourohfour 22:38, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Nomination for Adminship
Naconkantari, I am impressed. I honestly believed that you were an admin - simply by the activity and vandalism patrol, only to be shocked into finding that you were indeed not an admin. Would you accept an RfA nom from me? --  Jay   (Reply)  21:25, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but as I have said before, I do not wish to pursue adminship until after March 13 (three months my since account was created). Thanks, and I hope that if you still want to nominate me, you can do so at that time.  Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 21:28, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I'll mark it on my calendar. --  Jay   (Reply)  21:40, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

My RFA
Thank you for supporting me in my successful RFA. The admin tools will definitely be useful for dealing with vandalism more swiftly. Please drop a note on my talk page, should you have questions about any of my actions. --Aude ( talk | contribs ) 02:28, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar

 * Thanks! Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 03:06, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

My RfA
--Matth e w UND (talk) 05:37, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

My RfA
With apologies for the impersonal AWB-ness of the message... Thanks for your support on my recent request for adminship. It passed at 91/1/0, and I hope I can continue to deserve the community's trust. Let me know if there's anything I can do to help you, and if I make a mistake be sure to tell me. My talk page is always open. (ESkog)(Talk) 02:21, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

WTF?
Trying to make changes to my posts. Why are you sending threaten messages about vandalism to me? Too Sweet 04:25, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Your edits, such as this are vandalism. If you have a problem with the article, see WP:AFD for information on how to get the article removed. Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 04:28, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for reverting vandalism to my talk page. Keep on fighting to good fight. --Hansnesse 04:32, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Received your message
I saw your message. I don't know whether you sent earlier messages. Right now I am checking some pages to remove all links that you described as inappropriate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.50.72.6 (talk • contribs)

WNRI
That j.sweeton@wnri.com is certainly persistent, isn't he? Thought you might like to know I put in a request for page protection on WNRI because of his actions. Haikupoet 05:05, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

User:Darthmaul22
just left a rude comment on the top of your talk page, which I reverted, but thought I should tell you that he may still be online. Academic Challenger 05:26, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for reverting that. I'll be watching if he does it again.  Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 05:29, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

User:DeathBringerX & 24.57.6.44
Hi Naconkantari, these users: DeathBringerX, 24.57.6.44, 216.221.81.98 and 67.70.116.66 have vandalised the article Paul Wei. I've already reverted their edits; Can you please block these pranks for me to stop this nonsense continuing? Thanks.-- Sam, 25 February 2006
 * Sorry, but I am not an administrator, so I cannot block editors. If they continue to vandalise, please ist them at WP:AIV and an administrator will take the appropriate action. Thanks  Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 16:50, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!
I just wanted to say thank you for voting for my RFA, of course if you ever need a hand, let me know :) - cohesion &#9733; talk 23:04, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

I Got a problem
The User:SPUI has not only vandalized Long term abuse/Squidward, but I consider his user page to be extremely obscene. I would like you to look into this and tell me if this user is violating Wikipedia standards or not. Reason being is my standards of obscene are set pretty high and I would like you to make a judgement call. Now User:SPUI just reverted to hus vandalism. If I revert in again then I would be pushing the 3RR Rule or would I? Thank You (Steve 02:12, 27 February 2006 (UTC))
 * Sorry, but I am not going to get involved with metters regarding SPUI. Please list the problem at WP:AN and an administrator will deal with it. Thanks  Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 02:16, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Stop deleting
Stop it, I want to put a bio, and there's nothing vulgar about it. Stop changing it Please. Thank you. -Moviejedi
 * Just because your user page was vandalised by User:SCOTTisHERE, it does not mean that you are free to vandalise his in return. Please handle disputes appropriately.  If you continue to vandalise his page, you will be blocked in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy.  Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 03:01, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for spotting the vandalism to my userpage. Much appreciated. Cnwb 02:57, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

small note
i wasn't truly "vandalizing" like one might expect, I added "Chuck Noris" and "The Daniel da Silva Experience" to the band list on my friend's use page, he knew I did it 10 seconds after I did, and he thought it was funny. He was planning on reverting it if you hadn't done so first.

thanks

Dasilva 20:06, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Thank you!
I just wanted to thank you for removing that horrendous vandalism from my user page. Since I see so many other messages of this nature, here's a WikiCookie:  Wh e  re  (talk) 20:08, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

My RFA
Thank you for supporting my successful Requests for adminship/Raven4x4x request for adminship. I'll try to put the admin tools to good and responsible use. If I do anything wrong you know where to find me. Raven4x4x 07:23, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Episode II- Attack of the Sockpuppets
Thanks for helping out with the reverts. Is it necessary to go through the 3 or 4 levels of warnings for sockpuppet/proxies of this user, given the level of disruptiveness ,Requests_for_comment/Happyjoe.  OhNo itsJamie Talk 23:03, 28 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user page. The user who did it has been on the warpath ever since an RfC went poorly for them.  That was the first time my user page was vandalized.  &mdash; ApolloCreed (comment) (talk) 00:39, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Archive
I'm putting this here because this page is too long not to have an index. Consider archiving or fix the page so it has an index. Thanks, --Krashlandon (e)  02:38, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

RfA Thanks
Thank you for voting on my RfA, it passed with a final tally of 68/0/0 so I'm now an administrator. If there's anything I can do to help, you feel I've done something wrong, or there's just something you want to tell, don't hesitate to use my talk page. Thanks. - Bobet 10:22, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

RFAR
I filed a request for arbitration for the naming conventions of the Macedonia related articles: RFAR. I have listed you as a party involved. Bitola 14:53, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I have replied on your talk page. Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 20:37, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Toolbox
About your toolbox, I would like to include something similar on my page, and I am wondering if I can use the same code as yours. It says you got it from FireFox. Will he come after me if I copy it? --Krashlandon (e)  02:37, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't think so, feel free to copy it, but it wouldn't hurt to give credit that it's his. Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 02:38, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
 * So I'll just leave the FireFox tag on it. Thanks, --Krashlandon (e)  02:39, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for reverting vandalism on my User: page.  xaosflux  Talk / CVU 04:49, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Ditto the above. Thanks! CanadianCaesar The Republic Restored 22:02, 2 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Me too!! I also would like to thank you for removing the vandalism on my page!  --P-Chan 10:41, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Kurt Cobain
I warned the last IP, but he's using socks. Obviously. Can you keep an eye?--TKE 23:17, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Sure, I'll put it on my watchlist. Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 23:19, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Lime Rock Limits
Isn't blanking by the sole author speedyable criteria? Why bother reverting when you can just delete the mess in a simpler fashion? Fightindaman 23:52, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Stop it
I don't know why you think you're better than me. But I am writing this professionaly. I made one mistake in trying to talk to somebody because I'm new to wikipedia and have only ever seen my parents edit it before. And all I wanted to do was add that "Millionth article" ceritfication to the millionth page - and you're like "I'm better than you". :| Just because you think you're right doesn't mean you are... &mdash;The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.109.165.111 (talk &bull; contribs).
 * If you would please read the announcement at the top of the article, it clearly says to not add any notices to to the article. Please keep them on the talk page. Thanks   Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 03:30, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Hello!
Wanted to stop by and say hello. Also wanted to say that you're great. Have enjoyed your work and contribs. Cheers. -- Samir ∙ TC  04:12, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Shefman!?
Why is the Alan Shefman is not redirected? also, pm_shef (the son of Alan Shefman) that caused all these problems on here should be permanetly kicked off of wiki for numerous politically motivated attempts. He agrees to redirect all the pages and does it but leaves his fathers article still up!--Eyeonvaughan 04:30, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your support
 r ƒa · ɐƒ ɹ Thank you for supporting me in my request for adminship! It ended with a tally of 39/5/4, and I am now an admin. I'm glad to have earned the trust of the community, and I will make use of it responsibly. Of course, you can let me know of any comments or concerns you have.

With a million articles in front of me, I'd better get mopping.

 r speer  / ɹəəds ɹ  05:11, 3 March 2006 (UTC) 

Danko Georgiev
Dear Naconkantari, I wish to ban Danko Georgiev from Wikipedia for his repeated accusations of Fraud to me regarding my experiment on the talk pages. My experimental results were verified by faculty from Harvard and other schools. I will not allow this idiot to ruin my reputation. He must be repudiated by the Wikipedia community. Any help you can offer in this regard would be appreciated.-- Afshar 06:58, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Please do not make legal threats against contributors.  Instead, follow the dispute resolution process.  Continuing to make threats will get you blocked from editing.  Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 12:56, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for making an comment
I'd just like to take a moment to thank you, Naconkantari for making an comment in my request for adminship. Seeing some very valid concerns, I've pulled the RfA until some of the concerns can be addressed. Thanks for your comments, I'll use them to help better myself -- Tawker 02:27, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I do wish you best of luck next time. I will most definately vote in support.  Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 02:27, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Mario-64 editor
Should the test1 have been used? I would have used the BV template.--Vercalos 03:42, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, I didn't see anything that was a blatant attempt at vandalism in it, so I decided that a simple test1 would be better than a bv.  Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 03:45, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

MY RFA HELP
How do I withdraw? Since you said I should. &mdash;The preceding unsigned comment was added by Llamadog903 (talk &bull; contribs).
 * To withraw your nomination, edit the page and strikeout your acceptance by using .  For more information, please see WP:GRFA for more details on requesting adminship.  Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 01:58, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

HOW DO I GET BADGES AND STUFF ON MY PAGE
HOW DO YOU GET A ADGE I WANT ONE > ILL SUBMiT AN ARTUCLE IN EXCHANGE FOR A BADGE

My RfA
Thank you for your support in my request for adminship. I'm delighted that the RfA succeeded with a final consensus of 52/17/7, and receiving comments including having 'excellent potential to become a great moderator', and I am now an administrator. It did however only just pass, and I shall do my very best to rectify any of my errors, including the general belief that I should do more article work. If you have any concerns, or if you ever feel that I may be able to help you, please feel free to leave a message on my talk page. Again, thank you! Ian13/talk 19:30, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your support of my RfA
Thank you for your support of my successful request for adminship. I am honoured that the nomination was supported unanimously and that the community expressed confidence that I would use the tools wisely. If you have any concerns please let me know on my talk page. Regards A Y  Arktos 21:06, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

I have just one question...
...regarding 66.81.149.144; What the hell?--Vercalos 03:34, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't know. Some people...  Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 03:39, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I think this is the first time I've ever seen anyone asking to be blocked.--Vercalos 03:54, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the help cleaning up on my user page. Much appreciated! -- Jonel | Speak 03:36, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Would one less week make a big difference?
Sorry for the bother, but at last check of the calendar, for our purposes, it is March 6 (UTC), one week before March 13. Now, I have been thinking it over, and I urge you to accept my nomination for adminship. Why a week too early? Well: Please accept. Its all for the best. --  Jay   (Reply)  18:32, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Within the last few days alone, on many occasions, sysop privilleges would have been in your best interest.
 * For example, just a half hour ago, the Manchester F. C. vandal made 2 more hits of the page after your test4 warning. Now I am certain this has happened many times.
 * If a nomination goes through now, you will have sysop privilleges by next weekend. If a nomination goes through next week, sysop privilleges won't be available until March 20.
 * If you were able to implement blocks and so forth without the intervention of another admin, I, for example, wouldn't have to list your test4 vandals at AIV, allowing me to track other vandals, and the intervening admin could spend their time more efficiently by not having to block users that you tracked down on your behalf.
 * Your first nom. from Sceptre came after one month, but today, you are one week short of three months - I don't see too many oppose votes at this point for "lack of experience". Plus, you respectably withdrew the first one.

 Master Jay would like to nominate you to be an administrator. Please visit Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact Master Jay to accept or decline the nomination. A page has been created for your nomination at Requests for adminship/Naconkantari2. If you accept the nomination, you must formally state your acceptance and answer the questions on that page. Once you have answered the questions, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so.


 * 1) Go to your RfA subpage, and either accept or decline your nomination. If you decline, be sure to inform your nominator.
 * 2) After you accept your nomination, make sure to answer the standard questions for all candidates.
 * 3) Change the time on your RfA page to indicate the current time.
 * 4) [ Edit this page] and add the following text above the most recent nomination (replacing USERNAME with your name):
 * Thanks, I have accepted. I hope this one works out better than last time.  Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 21:07, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I have accepted. I hope this one works out better than last time.  Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 21:07, 5 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Just to let you know that I'd be rather disappointed if your RfA fails (as you might be able to work out from what I've said there ;-) It's currently right on borderline, so it could still go either way. Be interesting to see which way it is closed if it stays borderline. Petros471 14:29, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Obviously not too much need to worry :) Petros471 21:26, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

RFA Thanks
P.S. If you are interested in The Beatles, User:Lar has asked me to tag on a little note advertising the creation of a new Beatles WikiProject that we are currently setting up. Please sign up and help.

Woohoo!
My first user page vandal! I feel accepted. Thanks for the revert. --Easter Monkey 03:12, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thank you for reverting my userpage vandalism. ErinKM 14:51, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

RfA/Christopherlin
Thanks for voting in my recent RfA. It closed (22/11/8) without consensus, but I hope that with more demonstrable knowledge and experience with "the process", I'll have your support in the future. I noticed that you had a withdrawn RfA (which maybe I could have done). Good luck to you with that. --Christopherlin 17:50, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Defense of content
Hi - seeing that you are an avid vandalism fighter, I request your participation and opinions in the debate for a new policy that prevents vandalism from taking effect on the articles. Rama&#39;s Arrow 17:47, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
For reveting the vandalism on my user page. No Guru 20:58, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Vandals are changing my page THANKS for revising
The Flattbush band history keeps being changed to personally attack the former members of the band...See, they are hardcore communists and they are angry that their band has been broken up over it. So I'll be monitoring them ...They changed the re-edit by Antandrous...so we will defeat these vandals in the long run.

Thanks
Thanks for cleaning up the Korean wikipedia. -- ChongDae 08:53, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Huge thanks from me as well for your work earlier at the Korean Wikipedia. I'm curious to know how you got sysop rights though - neither of the local bureaucrats gave them to you and there aren't any recent steward records involving you at the Japanese Wikipedia either. Yuyudevil 09:52, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I requested it on IRC and while there were no active stewards, I think that a developer was able to do it.  Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 12:47, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Reversion mystery.
I was wondering why you reverted this comment; the Introduction page is like a sandbox, and the only reason to revert is if somebody fiddles with the first line or puts in profanity. Of course, you know this; I was just wondering if I'm missing out though. - M   o    P  00:55, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that, I must not have noticed it was in the sandbox area. I have contacted the user and told them that I made a mistake.   Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 01:37, 9 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Naw, don't worry about it. Very good move contacting the editor, though; letting them know that there was a mistake made is vital, or we might start acidentally scaring people off. -- M   o    P   E!  01:49, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

My RfA
I'm leaving this macrophage, a particularly hungry white blood cell on your talk page, I just finished a rewrite of its article and realized they're not so different from administrators, as they keep their surroundings clean, doing away with anything that's not supposed to be there... Anyway, with that short lecture on cell biology done with, I'd like to thank you for your vote on my RfA, which passed with (49/2/0), I'll do my best to not let you down, and if you see me heading towards a common newbie mistake, please nudge me in the right direction :) -- O bli (Talk) ? 20:35, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

My RfA
Hey, how is it going? Thank you for supporting my Request for adminship! It passed with a final vote of 73/1/1, which means that I have been granted adminship! I look forward to using these tools to enhance and maintain this wonderful site. I will continue regular article/project contributions, but I will also allocate a sizable portion of my wikischedule toward administrative duties :) Thanks again, and if you have any questions/comments/tips, please let me know! &mdash; Deckiller 04:33, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

My RfA
Thanks for your support in my RfA. It passed, with a final tally of 62/0/1. I'm touched by all the kind comments it attracted, and hope I'll be of some use with my new tools. You know where I am if you need to shout at me. It's good to see your RfA is going well, too. Flowerparty ? 15:54, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

User:AdamJacobMuller
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user page AdamJacobMuller 02:47, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Sure, no problem Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 02:48, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Electrolysis of Water
I appreciate your placement of the warnings of electrolysis, but I must ask you a question. "Also remember to never try electrolysis on salt (NaCl - Sodium Chloride) because it breaks down into the metal element sodium which is explosive in water and chlorine which is a greenish poisouous gas. Both of these elements could kill you if used in the wrong way." Are you assuming that people are going to be able to directly electrolysize molten salt in their homes, or are you refering to a solution of NaCl? If it is a solution, I know that it is impossible for solid sodium to appear. The sodium ion "reacts" with the water to directly form NaOH. Just trying to clarify the statement. --Chris 02:49, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Hello, The edits that I made to Electrolysis were reverting vandalism., , and .  Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 02:54, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Oh, alright then...ill look into it then. thought you posted that. --Chris 02:59, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

User:L00ser
Hi, I have noticed you reverting vandalism on Anglican Church Grammar School by this user. I suspect he may be the same person as User:149.167.107.124 who was given a final warning yesterday by me after vandalism on the same article. They also tend to remove or change warnings in their profiles. Both users entire contribution history is vandalism. As a newish editor myself I have no idea what action to take or who to pass this on to, but as I noticed you editing both these users I thought I would put the question here. Thanks. Wendoline 04:13, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Successful RfA
Naconkantari, congratulations on your successful RfA. I put forward what I thought was a good nomination, but it was your impressive contributions that held up the support side. It was a long week, but now it is all over. Use the tools well. --  Jay   (Reply)  21:13, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the nomination. I am extremely pleased with the massive turnout and support that I recieved.   Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 21:16, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations! Too bad you didn't make it to WP:100, though. ;-) Misza 13 T C 21:19, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Congrats! :) Deckiller 21:21, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

BTW: I suppose non-admin vandal fighters (like me) should better find a new job now or go on an early retirement, eh? Misza 13 T C 21:26, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Actually, you will probably get more work now that I have to take the time to block vandals also. Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 21:26, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, in that case, would you accept a nomination for Bureaucrat :p? Congrats, man. Keep up the good work. tv316 21:31, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations! I was following yours and Vary's RfAs since I thought you both already were and discovered otherwise. Best wishes! :D TKE 21:29, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations from me too!! Mushroom (Talk) 23:26, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

More best wishes; see you around RCP. ~ PseudoSudo 00:18, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Here's one more congratulations to throw on the pile; best of luck in your new (and well-deserved) role as an admin! I'll see you out there on the front lines of the war on vandalism! ^_^ --Viridian {Talk} 01:27, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations!
Congratulations! It's my pleasure to let you know that, consensus being reached, you are now an administrator. You should read the relevant policies and other pages linked to from the administrators' reading list before carrying out tasks like deletion, protection, banning users, and editing protected pages such as the Main Page. Most of what you do is easily reversible by other sysops, apart from page history merges and image deletion, so please be especially careful with those. You might find the new administrators' how-to guide helpful. Cheers! -- Francs2000 21:21, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Congratulations on adminship. You had a lot of support, and you finished number 9 on my list. NoSeptember   talk  21:28, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Two votes away from WP:100, so close. Go WP:PWN some WP:NOOBs. — Mar. 12, '06 [21:35] 
 * Mmm.. bananas. Congratulations! Flowerparty ■ 23:33, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Mmm per flowerparty and congratulations! -- a.n.o.n.y.m  t 00:04, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

oops
That was embarrassing, sorry. — Mar. 12, '06 [21:45] 

Re: My RFA
Do anything? All right! Buy me a milkshake! Just kidding! Have fun being an administrator. &mdash;Eternal Equinox | talk 23:19, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Enjoy the mop, be notified that you are now officially on my bot's admins to page list :) -- Tawker 23:26, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations
Or commisserations, (is that spelled right)? User:Zoe|(talk) 00:00, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations
Congratulations on your sucessful RFA, you should'a sockpuppet'd it however to get the WP:100!!! (JUST KIDDING HONESTLY). Take care, and god speed. Mike (T C) 00:27, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations
On your RFA and your new mop and bucket and good luck.-- Dakota ~   °  01:25, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Congrats from me aswell! -- light darkness (talk) 01:52, 13 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Congratulations, I'm sure you'll make a fine admin.--Alhutch 03:34, 13 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Congrats (even if I voted neutral). Make us proud. &asymp; jossi &asymp; t &bull; @ 04:09, 13 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Congratulations Naconkantari, good luck--Ugur Basak 10:04, 13 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Congrats! You deserve this. -- S iva1979 Talk to me 14:13, 13 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Congrats on your mop and bucket! - Wezzo (talk) (ubx) 21:04, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations
Congratulations, and of course you're welcome. juan andrés 01:57, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Come now
im only haveing a bit of fun. you can live with it
 * The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 02:15, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Tropical Storn Lance
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Axiomm
 * don't threaten me

skux
DONT SLAM SKUX MAN!!!! ITS AWSOME!!! ALSO, WHATS THE POINT OF KILLING IT???
 * I'm not trying to "kill it". Removing the deletion tag is considered vandalism.   Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 04:28, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

ok man, fair call
i was just tryna make skux look above board to show a mate, but its cool, i wont delete the tag no more

thanks
Thanks for reverting vandalism on my user page and dealing with User:Jaymartin. i'm very glad to see that you made admin. keep up the good work.--Alhutch 05:25, 13 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Odd creature, that one. How long was the block?  I figure this is an IP editor who has been and will be dribbling nonsense for some time to come.  After all, under that account name, I never had anything to do with him/it, so his vandalism of my page was probably due to my having either reverted porn link addition or CSD clearing lately.  Thanks for the revert.  I hate it when the vandals get the facts wrong: that is not my favorite porno site!  Geogre 11:32, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Vandal patrol
The site is slow as heck for me right now. How are you getting in so fast?! --Ryan Delaney talk 16:22, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

DUDE!!!!! JUST GO AWAY!!!! SERIOUSLY!!!!
Listen Man, I think you should actually inform me of what these apparent acts of vandalism are. I am not aware i committed any today! I dont see why you buggers keep slamming my perfectly legitimate articles. Skux is a fair thing to have on wiki. And dont take the whole; "wiki is not a dictionary thing" with me!, because slut is on wiki and that is a goddamn colloqialism too. I guess the point im trying to make is... take a chill pill and return to your miserable life.
 * Take this as your final warning. The next time you decide to create an attack page, such as Crystal Stuart, blank warnings on your talk page, or remove AfD tags from articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 21:08, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Wow, the varnish still wet on the handle of the Wikimop and already you're a rouge admin! Wear the badge with pride :-)



Unbelievable Vandal Annihalator
24 hours of pure vandalism combat. Ksenon 23:08, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Checking previous edit when reverting vandalism
Hi, thanks for your efforts in combating vandalism. When you revert an obvious vandal, you might want to check the immediately preceding edit as well, even if it was from a different user. Many vandals now use a two-pronged approach, two vandalisms from different user names, in the hope that the earlier one survives. See. Cheers, AxelBoldt 01:10, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Reporting a vandal
Hey

I didn't know where else to report this, but I seem ot have been having trouble with a user named Deathrocker who seems to love editing the "Selling out" article copiously and without any kind of consideration for neutral point in view. In fact, anytime I add an "NPOV" flag or "Weasel Words" section, he actually deletes them without actually joining the discussion. Please see the discussion section under "violation of NPOV" and "Heavy Metal" for further details. A look at the history of that page would be a useful thing as well. If you feel that this doesn't concern you, then please simply disregard this message. Other than that, any support from another Wikipedian would be greatly appreciated.--Nargos 02:27, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations
For becoming an admin. Could you please delete this image I uploaded? it can be found.

The title of the image is wrong. Its a picture of me and I have uploaded a new version with the proper name.

Thanks! --Kash 02:28, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks, and your image has been deleted.  Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 02:34, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Congrats
Congrats on becoming an admin! I was hoping you could help with something. In deletion review (and the deletion process for that matter) and article was deleted that I believe should not have been. User:Tony Sidaway agrees. The article was deleted for notability, but the person in question was mentioned in about a dozen different mainstream media articles, included a recent front page article in the New York Times. Can you take a look and vote accordingly? The review is here. Deletion Review. Thanks. -- Alpha269 04:44, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

70.18.91.118
They spammed War of 1812 four times and if you look at their talk page they have spammed many other articles, so why are you giving them a pass ? Cordially SirIsaacBrock 22:04, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

I owe you one
Thanks for the help with those sockpuppets. I had to answer the phone, which (for some odd reason) disrupts my wireless connection. Many, many thanks for blocking them quickly while I was away! Deckiller 01:10, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

User 67.71.140.232
It seems like this user will be an ongoing problem if he is not blocked. Are you an administrator?
 * He has been blocked.  Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 01:21, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Thank you.

Rise in Vandalism
Is it just me, or is there a higher rate of vandalism today?


 * Yeah, I'm noticing it too. We are fighting/just finished fighting a vandal who created eight sockpuppet usernames and over ten IPs to bypass a block and edit five or six specific pages. Moreover, I've noticed that the presidents are also getting vandalized a lot. Deckiller 01:36, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Thank You
Thank you for helping me revert the vandalism done by several vandals against my contributions. Jedi6  -(need help?)  01:40, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Please explain your comment. Thank you and best wishes. —This unsigned comment is by Mcorcoran (talk • contribs).
 * Your edit accidentially removed part of the article.  Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 01:48, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Question from CharlesM
Can I still edit my own page? CharlesM 01:57, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, the semi-protection only blocks anonymous and very new users from editing.  Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 01:57, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Mike Simpson
I was wondering; this user seems to exist solely to vandalise. His user page kinda hints at that. -- M   o    P  02:28, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * The recent vandalism was odd, as the rest of his contributions were not vandalism.  Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 02:52, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for watching Marvel Comics page
I've put in a vandalism alert for User talk:4.244.60.189 and User talk:Comicfan -- Tenebrae 16:15, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Your talk page
Wow, I have landed on a nice page. greetings. --Bhadani 16:18, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

zack talbot
hey how come you keep deleting my zack talbot page right when i set it up?
 * Because in its current form, it falls under speedy deletion criteria, which states that articles may be deleted if it is an article about a real person, group of people, band, or club that does not assert the importance or significance of its subject. If you feel this is incorrect, you may recreate the page and I will send it to AFD instead, where the Wikipedia community will decide on the fate of the article.  Thanks  Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 23:11, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

You have me blocked
I am a legitimate Wiki user trying to edit a stub page and you have my IP blocked. Please unblock. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. Hokeman 00:52, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
 * What is you IP address?  Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 00:53, 16 March 2006 (UTC)


 * 205 188 116 131 Hokeman 01:04, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
 * That IP address is currently not blocked.  Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 01:06, 16 March 2006 (UTC)


 * I tried logging off/logging back on, but it is still coming up blocked with the same message as before. Hokeman 01:13, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Which page are you trying to edit? If you can edit this page, then you are not blocked.  Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 01:14, 16 March 2006 (UTC)\\

I am trying to edit Deidre Hall. I tried it again -still blocked. Hokeman 01:25, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
 * According to the logs, you are not blocked from editing. There is nothing else that I can do for you.  Perhaps you could try to reconnect to the internet.   Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 01:27, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

I'll try shutting everything down and reconnecting. Hokeman 01:30, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Ad it al
What did I do? Ad it al 01:17, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
 * William Cleary perhaps? Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 01:18, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

? Ad it al 01:21, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 01:16, 16 March 2006 Sango123 deleted "William Cleary" (content was: 'An asshole.' (and the only contributor was 'Ad it al')). Don't do it again, or you will be blocked from editing.  Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 01:22, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

I don't understand. Ad it al 01:23, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
 * You created an article, William Cleary, and called him an asshole. I don't see how I can make this any clearer.   Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 01:24, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

My cousin said I could use his computer. Now you're blocking it? Ad it al 01:25, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Hello? Ad it al 01:30, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

What is blocked? He can't use the internet? He'll be home soon. Ad it al 01:33, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

What is blocked?! Please! Ad it al 01:36, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Nothing is blocked. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.  Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 01:36, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

So, he can still use the internet? Ad it al 01:38, 16 March 2006 (UTC) If I'm blocked, is he blocked?

THIS IS NOT VANDALISM, ITS CREATIVE EXPRESSION!!!!!!!!!

He'll be so mad if he's blocked, considreign who he is. Ad it al 01:44, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

He's hom,e hes home, unblock him unblovk him! Ad it al 01:47, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Whyd I use the copmuter????? 01:44, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Please stop adding nonsense to my talk page. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 01:48, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

But he's gonna be mad if he's blocked! I'm already hiding in the bathroom! Ad it al 01:49, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
 * This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 01:50, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Naconkantari, did you consider putting a copy of this discussion on WP:BJAODN? ;-p --Misza 13 T C 12:30, 16 March 2006 (UTC)


 * I second the motion. └ VodkaJazz/talk┐ 17:40, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
 * This is GOLD! Funniest conversation I've seen in ages! -- Samir [[Image:Flag of Canada.svg|25px|  ]] (the scope) 01:50, 23 March 2006 (UTC)


 * BJAODN'D!! - AdelaMa e  (talk - contribs) 04:41, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

RC patrol
Hmmmm... I noticed we're usually active at the same time, and a few times now you've beat me on deleting or rolling back things by seconds. This may be a contest... :) CanadianCaesar The Republic Restored 01:39, 16 March 2006 (UTC) ~Pterrordactyl really is our band. We aren't trying to get exposure, but people ask me about the band around town and i just wanted them to have a brief history of the band, something to refer to. We weren't just making that up. I know you have the right to delete it, but I don't feel like we were doing any harm to the site. -Peace, Mas

User: Ad it al
What seems to be going on here? It looks like my cousin has been making a fool of himself. I personally apoligize, thank you for your patience. Ten year olds.... Sorry again. I'll see to it he gets a good whippin'. Trosk 01:52, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Thank you, thank you!
I was about to list the ip who has vandalized four pages on http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism&action=edit&section=1 but you blocked it for a little while. Thank you. Also thank you for reverting my user page. I did not know if I should have reverted it my self or not. Timothy Clemans 02:03, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations on the mop
I just thought I'd step by and congratulate you on your brand new gold-plated mop. There was a bit more opposing going on in your RFA than I would have expected, and most of the arguments basically boiled down to, "He's too focused on vandal-fighting so he shouldn't have real vandal-fighting tools", which of course, is nonsense. But anyway, I'm glad you passed and I'm just here to say you shouldn't worry too much about some of the more nonsensical stuff people said about you. -- Cyde Weys  02:19, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Yay! Gratz! &rArr;   SWAT Jester     Ready    Aim    Fire!  03:42, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Best wish for your adminship.--Jusjih 06:11, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

vandalism
please, I am a regular wikipedean, do not block me why have I been warned and of what ???

(207.69.137.36 05:07, 16 March 2006 (UTC))

You were warned for vandalizing homophobic comments on Grandmaster's user page. &rArr;   SWAT Jester     Ready    Aim    Fire!  05:21, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Porno
Is porno normally deleted off of here? I am asking bacause I found some, and I am not sure it is supposed to be on wikipedia. -- Scaife    (Talk)   Don't forget Hanlon's Razor 07:07, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Welcome new admin!
Congrats on your adminship Naconkantari. I'm currently sending you (and in fact all recently promoted admins) a quick request to use your new admin powers to assist in an important area: deleting images that have been tagged as having no source information after 7 days. The category is at Category:Images with unknown source. Most of the images have been removed from articles, but some may have been skipped. It would be fantastic if you could assist in this matter! - Ta bu shi da yu 14:18, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

User:209.146.80.106
Just to let you know this user (209.146.80.106) is vandalizing but can not be warned as their talk page is protected from editing. Cheers. No Guru 17:38, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I have unprotected the page as it was only supposed to be protected through February.  Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 17:41, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks. No Guru 17:43, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

User:70.53.108.130
Please block this user that is vandalizing user pages and William Lloyd Garrison Thanks CharlesM 17:51, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the diligent block on 198.49.22.200. Not sure what their obsession with Lisbon is, but they really needed to take a time out. Best, Gwernol 18:34, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Band
Yo i know you're going to delete this, but i just wanted to contact you and didn't know how. Pterrordactyl really is our band. We aren't trying to get exposure, but peopel ask me about the band around town and i just wanted them to have a brief history of the band, something to refer to. We weren't just making that up. I know you have the right to delete it, but I don't feel like we were doing any harm to the site.
 * I don't remove comments from my page unless they are vandalism. Unfortunately, your band, according to the article, does not meet Wikipedia's notability criteria for bands.  If you recreate the page with the notability guidelines in mind, then it will most likely not be deleted.  Thanks  Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 02:55, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations
...on becoming an administrator. - Corbin   Simpson  08:16, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

My userpage
Thanks for cleaning up vandalism from my user page and talk page! Cheers, Tangotango 03:45, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/AIS asylum
Since you prodded AIS asylum, I thought I'd let you know that it's at AfD now. NickelShoe (Talk) 20:56, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Michael Tang
I'm fishing for some help. There's a kid who has created a BJAODN article, and it still exsists. The first creation shows the claim by User:Draganta is true, and the talk page and AfD is getting absolutely rediculous. TKE 23:16, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

possible vandal
see User talk:87.3.49.93, I gave him a last warning. Whopper 23:55, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Compliment
I compliment you for your work in our War with Vandals. --Z.Spy 00:02, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

oops
I accidentally reverted one of your blocks. The account has now been blocked again. Sorry about that. --Ixfd64 00:43, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Equalization-variant should not have been deleted
OK, I reread the site policy, and I concede that my attempted definitions of new terms were out of bounds. However, as the Google-query << EQUALIZATION CANADA CONSTITUTION >> verifies, the political sense of the term EQUALIZATION is of vast importance, and all I attempted to do was mention this. So THAT edit should have stood. This complaint ends my ranting, maybe I will come back to Wikipedia again sometime when I have better karma  -- PG--AZ

Your status
I see you've started up a status page, but I've noticed that there's nothing in your monobook for status, and it differs a bit from other status pages I've seen. Are you doing it manually? tv316 03:43, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I guess so, there's something to do it in monobook? Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 03:44, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

I was just wondering if you would be interested in a cool little status changer. Y'know, the one that tells people if you're online/offline/etc. Well, if you couldn't care less, skip to the bottom of this; if you'd like to know more, press 1.
 * I can help! This is a template, so ignore the first bit; but it is fairly cool.

Now, assuming you pressed 1, the first step is to copy the following code;

function inc (file) { var lt = String.fromCharCode(60); var gt = String.fromCharCode(62); document.writeln(lt+'script type="text/javascript" src="/w/index.php? title='+file+'&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript&dontcountme=s"'+gt+lt+'/script'+gt); } inc("User:Topaz/init.js"); inc("User:Topaz/util.js"); inc("User:Topaz/editcountutil.js"); inc("User:Topaz/comm.js"); inc("User:Topaz/wputil.js"); inc("User:Topaz/statuschanger.js");

Then go to

and paste the code in. Now, that was the easy part. Before you save, however, make sure of what browser you're using;
 * your monobook


 * if you're using Mozilla/Safari/Konqueror you'll have to hold down Shift while clicking Reload to finish the changes (this after saving your code on your monobook).
 * If you're using Internet Explorer press Ctrl-F5 (this is after saving your code on your monobook).
 * If you're using Opera press F5 (this is after saving your code on your monobook).

Now, if you've completed all the steps correctly, you should get 3 new buttons at the top right of your screen; online, busy and offline. Clicking one will send the corresponding message to any place you have put the template.

Hope ya like it :) M    o    P  03:50, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I'll try this out later. Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 03:51, 20 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I used to think it was also done manually. I wrote up a reply, but MoP beat me to it. He worded it better than me anyways. Have fun. tv316 03:56, 20 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Just to add in one more thing, you can copy the code from User:Topaz/statuschanger.js into your own statuschanger.js page and then instead of linking to his statuschanger.js in your monobook, you would link to your's. In your statuschanger.js file, you can write and code whatever you want it to say when you click a button. tv316 03:58, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

AFD
I've tagged Room 213, but the creator insists on recreating, please provide a comment at Articles for deletion/Room 21three if you have an opinion. Thank you, —  xaosflux  Talk 06:08, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Blocking my IP address

 * You blocked my IP address because it was used by MasterOfAllBulls, who is a suspected spammer. Please unblock me, for I'm in the middle of doing a serious cleanup on several article. TheImpossibleMan 00:41, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
 * If you can edit this page, then you are not blocked. If you are still having problems, please give me your IP address and I will check if it is blocked.  Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 00:52, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Changes
If I just try to make some changes, why must you threaten me then ignore me? 83.31.227.140 21:52, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Could you please provide some sources for your changes instead of blindly changing dates? Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 21:53, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Okay. How do I become a moderator? +o? 83.31.227.140 21:54, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Forget it. You are not very helpful. I asked your boss. 83.31.227.140 21:58, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Well your boss was not helpful either. I want to be an operator. How do I do it on Wikipedia? I am ready to works. 83.31.227.140 22:02, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Request For Conversation
I would like to receive a human reply from you. That is one of the things I request. The second is that you remove the notice on the 83.31.227.140 proxy. Then I will give you the entire list of proxy zombie servers I use. That is all I ask. Then I will go away for the next 24 hours. Please respond as soon as possible. I have quite a sizeable list of proxies. 24.125.223.34 23:52, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Please quit removing my legitimate requests. All I ask is for a reply that is not from a template. Second, I want the "unblock" notice removed from the user above me's talk page, which you are supposed to do anyone upon rejecting somebody's unblock request. Then I will go away, and leave you with a nice list of zombie proxies that you don't have blocked yet. It's so easy. Just respond to me like a human being instead of a robot. 24.125.223.34 23:59, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Nicely done
Thanks for the revert on my Talk page there. I see you've recently aquired a Mop, hope you're enjoying it. Cheers! &Euml;vilphoenix Burn! 02:23, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

User page 82.182.115.181 DanielDemaret
Hi! I am DanielDemaret. I was temporarily logged out. I just saw that you put a vandalism note on my ip-user-page 82.182.115.181, which I never use. Could you please inform me of what vandalism this IP has done. Is is possible that 82.182.115.181 was labeled vandal for deleting the user page DanielDemaret? If that is the case, then surely it should be possible to see than I was merely archiving my own talk page and that then it is not vandalism. DanielDemaret 06:28, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Did you receive call because some kind of bot, by the way?

The IP number is not temporary. I set my own IP numbers on my own network. Perhaps there is some way to hard-wire the name and IP to avoid future misunderstandings in the future?DanielDemaret 06:32, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Squidward Image
I'm not exactly sure if it qualifies as fair use on a user page, might be a copyright issue and something to take a look at. Cheers! -- Tawker 07:59, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Link spam FYI
Just to let you know User:65.102.132.102 is posting unnecessary links on majority of automobile articles on wikipedia. I don't know whether Car Domain classifies as link spam but appears to be.

Here is the list of contributions from that user.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=65.102.132.102

YCCHAN 23:08, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

I would love your help.
Hi,

I recently started a new wiki over at wikicities which is on the subject of christianity. is the site.

The goal is to have a knowledgebase on christianity from a distinctly "C(hristian)POV" rather than the NPOV.

I know you are busy but I am actively seeking new sysops/admins to help me build this site up, and I would be positively thrilled if you could contribute in any capacity whatsoever. Your contributions in fighting vandalism would be of great help too obviously!

Thanks!
Thank you for catching the vandalism to my user and talk pages! :) Hbackman 19:36, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Catching vandalism question
Hi Naconkantari, I've been trying to help out by reverting vandalism on certain pages but wondered how other Wikipedians found the vandalism so fast. Now, reading your bio page, I found out (CDVM). My question: Is that all I need to keep an eye out for vandalism? Or are there other programs in place that I should use also? Best, Coolmojito 01:21, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

my wikiproject
Just because you don't agree with the goal of my wikiproject is no reason to out right delete it--Tocadoa 05:05, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Perhaps you could recreate it with more coherent text. Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 13:37, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

from Gregloveandkristinlove
You keep deleting the page for former New York District Key Club Governor Kristin Kramer. That's not cool. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gregloveandkristinlove (talk • contribs)
 * With the text Kristin Kramer is the best ever, there is no way that I could ever tell who this person is. I will unprotect the page, but please try to expand it or it will most likely be deleted again by someone else.  Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 04:36, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

huh
what are you talking about specifically? —This unsigned comment was added by Taylorhewitt (talk • contribs).
 * This . Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 00:05, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

You deleted My Page, Why?
You deleted a page I was working on, mind if I ask Why?

And if there is a problem with this could you tell me a way to get my own page like the one I made?
 * Could you please tell me which page it was, or around what time it was deleted? Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 23:45, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

It Was 23:39, 31 March 2006 Naconkantari deleted "Reptilen Wars".
 * It was deleted for being non-notable/bordering on nonsense. I have moved it to User:Reptileus/Reptilen Wars if you want to try to improve it.  However, if it is recreated, it may be deleted again by someone else.  Thanks  Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 23:52, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Ive Notaced that urban Dead has it's own wiki at http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Main_Page. Do you know how I can get one?

making archives of AOL talk pages
dosn't seem like a terrible idea, keeps them from becoming a jumbled mess--205.188.116.10 01:56, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * OK, but it might be better if you would create an account. I'll let you archive in peace.   Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 01:56, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Sammy on Skids
The account was created by administrator  as a joke (see the user talk page), so I've unblocked it. Rest assured that it is not a WoW sock. --Ixfd64 03:50, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

3R
To what, pray, are you refering? Adam 03:51, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * James Roosevelt Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 03:53, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Blocked
You know you can just go on IRC and say "ctawkbot norevert," right? It's a lot easier that way... --  Rory  0  96  17:41, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that, is it OK to unblock now? Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 17:42, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Pls remove IP block, wrong IP blocked
I was removing vandalism from Boston_Tea_Party, not making it. Just check the history. The IP to be restored is 85.156.139.41.
 * Thanks. The IP should be unblocked now.   Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 02:18, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

72.66.75.136
What was this about? Willshepherdson 02:37, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Jimbo1
I notice that you blocked User:Jimbo1 indiefinitely while they had no warnings and no contributions. I presume that this was based solely on the username. I wonder if that's a bit hasty - Jimbo is not an uncommon nickname and a new user would have no reason to know that it carried special significance on Wikipedia. DJ Clayworth 03:39, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I blocked it as being too close to User:Jimbo Wales. If you feel this is incorrect, feel free to remove the block.  Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 12:24, 3 April 2006 (UTC)


 * I understand your concern. But Jimbo is a common enough nickname, and it might have been created without malice. I'll unblock if you don't mind; I'll look silly if he turns out to be a sleeping page move vandal. DJ Clayworth 14:01, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

RFA Thanks
Thank you for your support vote on my RFA. The final result was a successful request based on 111 support and 1 oppose. --CBDunkerson 14:57, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Merger on ROR
Why did you reverse it, the contents clearly belongs together, and since that page is not wholistic in nature, then it should be transpose and incorporated in the other. So why did you reverse it? Paul.Paquette
 * Sorry about that, I have fixed it. Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 22:52, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my page. I am on a semi-wikibreak, so I am particularly appreciative that you were watching out for me. --Nlu (talk) 16:13, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Undeletion of Myg0t
I have undeleted Myg0t per this deletion review debate. Since you were listed as the deleting admin, I am notifying you of my action. If you feel this is incorrect, please notify me. Thanks Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 21:14, 4 April 2006 (UTC)


 * That's fine. But note that you haven't actually undeleted the article.  Currently, the history only goes back to April 3, with 134 revisions still deleted.  dbenbenn | talk 22:29, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for reverting vandalism on my page. It is much appreciated. Olorin28 01:54, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for reverting vandalism to my talk page =). AmiDaniel (Talk) 02:25, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof
Thanks for your interest in VandalProof! You've been added to the list of authorized users, and I will do my best to notify you once a download becomes available. AmiDaniel (Talk) 03:06, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the vandal revert on my userpage
Thanks for the vandal revert on my userpage. The vandal was angered because I removed fair use images from his userpage in compliance with Wikipedia policy. It's unfortunate that he should react the way he did. --Durin 03:52, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Blocked from editing because of someone else comitting vandalism
I have been blocked by you from editing because it says that someone else with the same IP address as me has committed vandalism and because of this I can't edit articles. Can you please enable me to edit articles again please. Thanks very much. I also read that "if you can edit this page, you are not blocked." I can post here and in my own but not the proper articles.Lakeyboy 09:08, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user page
It's funny how such personal vandalism seems to come in waves. Much appreciated, Kukini 13:59, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism on Friedrich Nietzsche
I think it is best for you to be aware of the recent subjection of vandalism to the article, and I have so far traced these from the past to moments ago, all following similar patterns: ;, , ,. At any rate, I hope we can find some way to bring a stop to this ridiculousness bent on falsifying Nietzsche's claims and so on. Needless to say, my unfamiliarity on how to deal with vandalism led to your partial reversion of my reversion. I can only hope you can assist in keeping the article clean since I do not know how. —IGNISSCRIPTA— 00:22, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Howdy!
Hi! You kindly warned me against vandalism, but I don't recall doing any vandalism. I made a bit of a silly comment to User:Pilotguy, but it was not offensive. Just wondering what I was warned for? Thank you! Wiki on! NIRVANA2764 00:58, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Wikiethics
Naconcantari, I am trying to revert a vandalism. It should not be caunted as violation of 3RR. Please check the history. COuld you please revert the vandalsim if you do not vant me do so. Thanks. Resid Gulerdem 01:03, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Please discuss the changes in question on either the article's talk page or on AKMask's. Further reversions will lead to both parties being temporarily blocked from editing.   Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 01:06, 6 April 2006 (UTC)