User talk:Nakon/archive3

Thanks!
Many thanks for the speedy vandalism reversion of my userpage. Regards  Ban  e  z  08:03, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

I havent been on the wiki for quite some time but i see while i was gone, someone vandalized my talk page and you reverted it. thanks for lookin' out - dave Cavebear42 20:20, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for the vandalism on my page! I cannot express appreciation enough! Thank you! -Airridi 02:18, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Ooh, ta!
Thanks for undoing the blanking of my talk page! ➨ ❝ R E  DVERS ❞ 20:24, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

IP address blocks
The IP address block you made to block User:Jacky1234 is the Google web proxy! So you've effectively blocked anyone who is using the Google Web Accelerator! (Oops!) Please undo this block ASAP. See my talk for page for additional information. NetRange:  64.233.160.0 - 64.233.191.255 CIDR:      64.233.160.0/19 NetName:   GOOGLE NetHandle: NET-64-233-160-0-1 Parent:    NET-64-0-0-0-0 NetType:   Direct Allocation NameServer: NS1.GOOGLE.COM NameServer: NS2.GOOGLE.COM --Stephane Charette 07:13, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

A Download Is Now Available
I just wanted to let you know that a download of VandalProof has recently been made available. AmiDaniel (Talk) 09:50, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

Can't sleep, clown will eat me RFA 33⅓
Thank you for your early support during my third RFA. The self-nomination was successful, with an unexpected number of participants from all over. If you ever need anything, are feeling snackish, or would just like to chat, please feel free to visit me on my talk page; I never sleep. 8-) Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 19:47, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Please help
The anon at the Galatasaray page just changed their IP and is now making personal attacks. Can you please semi-protect the page? Thanks. --Khoikhoi 23:48, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Roger Stone
Hi!!! I presume you are referring to Roger Stone's wikpage. What did I do?? All I did was fix some links and delete vandalism (about an orgy). Check for yourself!! 216.194.58.76 00:31, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I have replied on your talk page. Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 00:33, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Marriage
Hi there. You protected this about two weeks ago. Since WP:SEMI is for dealing with serious, current vandals, I figure it's been more than long enough to unprotect it now. Can I ask you to check your other recent protections and lift them as necessary, also to remember protections in general? CAT:SEMI is nearly 100 items, most of them seem to have been forgotten by the protecting admin. Thanks. -Splash talk 22:15, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

More vandal whacking thanks
Hey many thanks for deleting those Squidward revisions on my userpage and usertalk, as always, it is appreciated. Regards --  Ban  e  z  07:57, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Chad revert
Regarding the test on Chad page, if you look at the present location of the two images in the center, the image on the left overlaps on the line above atleast it did on my firefox browser, so i changed the image location to the right so the page had both the images in center on the right and no content was added or deleted by me, and it was no test that i was conducting on the wikipedia, frankly speaking you should have looked at the content of the page before sending me such a warning and i think it was nothing more than a gross misuse of administrative power given to you at wikipedia.(210.214.11.38 19:26, 15 April 2006 (UTC))
 * Your edit removed the end of the article. Also, please mind WP:NPA.  Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 19:27, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

User:70.95.218.47
I have placed a report on the editing behavior of User:70.95.218.47 at Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents --WikiCats 03:10, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

VandalProof 1.1 is Now Available For Download
Happy Easter to all of you, and I hope that this version may fix your current problems and perhaps provide you with a few useful new tools. You can download version 1.1 at User:AmiDaniel/VandalProof. Let me warn you, however, to please be extremely careful when using the new Rollback All Contributions feature, as, aside from the excessive server lag it would cause if everyone began using it at once, it could seriously aggitate several editors to have their contributions reverted. If you would like to experiment with it, though, I'd be more than happy to use my many sockpuppets to create some "vandalism" for you to revert. If you have any problems downloading, installing, or otherwise, please tell me about them at User:AmiDaniel/VP/Bugs and I will do my best to help you. Thanks. AmiDaniel (Talk) 06:48, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Sorry
I'm sorry if you think I'm too new to be an adminship but I've been being a Wikipedian since December, 2003. I just didn't have an account. I know all about Wikipedia. I have interviewed many Wikipedians and have even made friends with a few. I WAS a perfect adminship nominee. An old nominee, General Eisenhower 17:25, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Undeletion of Myg0t
I have undeleted Myg0t per this deletion review debate. Since you were listed as the deleting admin, I am notifying you of my action. If you feel this is incorrect, please notify me. Thanks Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 21:14, 4 April 2006 (UTC)


 * That's fine. But note that you haven't actually undeleted the article.  Currently, the history only goes back to April 3, with 134 revisions still deleted.  dbenbenn | talk 22:29, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
 * So, would you object if I went ahead and actually undeleted that article? User:dbenbenn 20:36, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
 * No, not at all. The reason that I left the old article deleted was because the history was filled with vandalism.  If you want to restore the whole history, go ahead.   Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 20:38, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Sevenlinefeatures
Can you please block this user? I gave him his final vandalism warning and put my complaint on the Admin block page but the guy has gone on a rampage. It's absurd. --Strothra 20:42, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Nevermind, Thanks!!--Strothra 20:42, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

My RfA
Sorry about the malformed RfA. I fixed it. I found that directions a little confusing. I have Nonverbal learning disorder and I'm only 10. Please change your vote. Jonathan235 21:41, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but I don not feel that you are ready to be an administrator. A bureaucrat has removed your nomination from the main page.  Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 21:42, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Master Jay's RfA
NK, thank you for your support at my recent RfA. If you have any concerns, please leave me a note. Thanks --Jay(Reply) 01:31, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Cuba
If you'd read my own talk page you'd see the discussion about the software bug that caused it - i am not a newbie or a vandal - i've been an administrator for three years and been with the 'pedia for five. PMA 02:18, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Ok. However, if your edits continue to cut off the ends of articles, they will be reverted.   Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 02:20, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
 * It isn't my fault though - as Redvers said on my talk page it's happened to him too - i shouldn't be blamed for a software bug. PMA 02:24, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
 * It most likely isn't your fault, but if you continue to have problems, please post them on Bugzilla or in #wikimedia-tech on . Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 02:27, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Request
Hi, I listed a 3RRvio, but no one replied. Would you be able to do the block? Thanks. &mdash;Khoikhoi 03:33, 18 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Wow, that was fast! Thanks again. &mdash;Khoikhoi 03:41, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks.
Thanks you for protect my page from vandalism. You are very good wikipedian as much as famous wikipedian, and I also appreciate that you suggested him or her to stop editing my page. anyways, Thanks a lot. ChineseDan, 19 April 2006, 02:46(UTC).


 * Thnx a lot for blocking me. I don't supposed you blocked your buddy Irpen tho either, right?Constantzeanu 18:09, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

Editing User_talk:67.177.113.231
Why did you just edit my usertalk page back? I am trying to get people away from this page, because I have registered as Robomaeyhem67.177.113.231 21:58, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
 * The page belongs to the IP address, and it is possible that other editors may use that IP.  Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 21:59, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

What the heck
Who did I attack and how? AriGold 22:54, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Your edit summary here. Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 22:54, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
 * So, my personal comment on my own talk page that I am archiving is somehow an attack on someone? That's absurd.AriGold 22:56, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

delete or redirect a template
hey can you delete or redirect this template about Dish Network. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Dish_Network

Its not needed since there is already Dish Network page Dish Network

I would do it myself but it says I'm not allowed to. Why?

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 162.83.98.60 (talk • contribs) 19 April 2006 (UTC)

82.196.129.98
Crossposted from talk page on meta

Hi Naconkantari. I wanted to ask about meaning of this "scan failed". Does this mean that this host is not a proxy, or it was offline at the moment of scan? It is important because this IP is involved in ArbCom case on Russian Wikipedia. Best regards, Max S em 09:34, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * On further review, this ip is originating from a web-server, which is a good indication of a proxy server. However, I was unable to connect to Wikipedia from the ip.  The ip is registered to Centertelecom Service, so it may also be a user with a web-server on their computer.  I would now mark it as being inconclusive.  Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 14:44, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Max S em 14:47, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

User page vandalism
Thank you for reverting my user page vandalism while I was offline.  TDS (talk • contribs) 17:37, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

Jesse Dangerously vandalism
Thanks for catching this repeatedly. Looks like someone's got too much time on their hands and a personal beef to air out. Tony Fox 00:07, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Blocking
You reccently blocked my ip because of another user, Im not quite sure what to do to undo the block help would be appreciated.--Gw099 01:07, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Old Skool Esperanzial note
Since this isn't the result of an AC meeting, I have decided to go Old Skool. This note is to remind you that the elections are taking place now and will end at 23:50 UTC on 2006-04-29. Please vote here. Thanks. --Cel es tianpower háblame 20:42, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Gracias
Thank you, Naconkantari, for your support in my recent RfA. The community has now entrusted me with admin tools. Let the fun begin. 8)--Rockero 23:38, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry on Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy
Greetings having noticed that you blocked User:Raphael101 for being a sockpuppet of User:Raphael1 I thought you should be aware of this RFCU regarding the two. Thanks! Netscott 01:29, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Permission to use IRC logs.
Hey there, I was wondering if I had your permission to publish some of your IRC chat on Wikipedia, specifically:

«12:43:53» {+Naconkantari} AWB's verification is too easy to defeat

I previously had these up in accordance to IRC Channels, as the channel you said it in #vandalism-en-wp did not have a rule against logging visible on a related website or on WP:IRC and related pages. However, despite the fact that the logs were related to a ongoing discussion, and they were trimmed to size, an administrator with personal involvement to the issue deleted the content. As such, I am seeking permission of use from every user I am quoted. Your cooperation would be appreciated.

Thanks,  Av i  ll  ia  19:52, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Could you please direct me to the content that was deleted? Thanks.  Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 21:16, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

May 2 - sandbox?
You are persistently reverting my adjustments to the page regarding May 2. Why is this? You talk about experimentation! This is not experimentation! The challenge is the scholarship exam of Westminster School, one of the most important exams in the country, and Alexander Entwistle is going for it. Please stop adjusting this addition! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Alexandere111 (talk • contribs) 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Timothean Religion Article
As I said on the talk page at that article,

If only I could have made this up, I'd be on to better and bigger things than Wikipedia by now. But that's not the case:- http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1575021501/qid=1146002303/sr=1-8/ref=sr_1_8/104-0106382-2973531?v=glance&s=books

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Timothean_religion"

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Profundity06 (talk • contribs) 06:29, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Bah
Please be careful, as a newbie, about the overzealous use of warning templates. It's exceptionally rude to do that to someone who obviously knows what the 3RR is, which is why, you might note, that I haven't broken it. Ambi 05:00, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm well aware that you haven't broken it, but you did revert the page three times.  Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 13:39, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

accusation of vandalism
okay if you take a look at the history of the article, i simply add the extra information deleted. In addition, if you watch the NBA, you will know the stuff I wrote are, by no means, vandalism. Please stop accusing me of being a vandal. Thanks--Bonafide.hustla 02:03, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * He is also known for his large moose dick hardly seems like a valid edit. Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 02:04, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

ok maybe we should re-phrase it a little bit.--Bonafide.hustla 03:49, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * ..maybe you should refrain from editing until you can contribute constructively instead of wasting the time of others. Thank you. --Downwards 04:04, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Why?
So I try a post article about Tesia Samara, something that wasn't easy for me to do, and it gets deleted for no reason? You have some kind of problem with Transgender people? Osaria 10:20pm April 26th (of all days to delete a GLBT article)


 * Response posted to User talk:Osaria -- Fr a ncs2000 [[Image:Gay flag.svg|25px| ]] 02:23, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Nintendo NSider Forums
Sorry about that -- I accidentally reverted a revert of vandalism. Please accept my apologies. TheProject 02:54, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Talk:George Washington
First, I want to thank you for reverting the vandalism done to the George Washington article. Enlight of this I would like you to comment on the discuss I start on the talk pages entitle Fully Protected. Please read my statements carefully and voice your opinon. Thanks for everything!--(Steve 01:22, 3 May 2006 (UTC))

WP:POINT
Re: Your comments in Articles_for_deletion/Circle_of_Death_(drinking_game). I think I've finally figured out why you believe my nominations were in violation of WP:POINT, although no thanks to you. To someone who didn't read the original comment carefully and in context, it might appear that I am nominating all the articles out of spite over the nomination of Bizu-Bizu.

In the future, I suggest you read discussions carefully and not jump to the conclusion that things are done in bad faith. That is all. Aplomado - UTC 04:14, 3 May 2006 (UTC)