User talk:Nakon/archive9

Signpost updated for December 4th.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:46, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

ISP Proxy in the UAE
Please don't block IPs from the United Arab Emirates. The Regulatory Authority REQUIRES that internet connections go through the telecom providers proxy filter, so we have no legal choice in the matter. These IPs are assigned dynamically (and frequently change while connected) so if one user abuses an IP, by blocking it all that happens is that the next user on that IP is affected. Not the original spammer or abuser. I disconnected and reconnected several times to get through with an IP that is not blocked so I can edit this page.

"Your account or IP address has been blocked from editing. You were blocked by Naconkantari for the following reason (see our blocking policy): open proxy or zombie (see WikiProject on open proxies for information)

Your IP address is 195.229.241.182." 213.42.2.21 13:57, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 11th.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:12, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

back? not really
I just popped back on to fix my archives. I'll be back later this month, hopefully. Nacon kantari 05:51, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

PB text
Naconkantari, the rules here on wiki is that when someone makes an edit, you have to disscuss the point if you dont agree. So I am asking you why did you revert the edit for the PB paragraph. Do you have a personal issue going on here. PLEASE COMMENT WHEN YOU REVERT!!!! --Netquantum 11:56, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

64.31.XXX.XXX IP Range aka 'Bartman' Vandal
Thanks for blowing up his user page. That troll is losing his entertainment value quickly. Please see the notes I've left on the talk page; keep your guns hot. :)  E. Sn0 = 31337 = Talk 08:14, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Category:Airports in mainland China
It was empty because its content were all removed before the speedy tag was applied. Michael G. Davis 19:21, 16 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Please undelete the category. Thank you. Michael G. Davis 17:49, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

WP:UW
Hi,

You have put yourself as interested in helping out atWikiProject on user warnings. We are now at a stage where we are creating the new templates and are wondering if you are still interested? If so please visit the overview page and choose a warning type you wish to work on. There is a base template available here, which you can copy and use to get you started. Have a look through the redirects and see what old templates are affected and incorporate them into the the new system. Anyway, any questions please don't hesitate to give me a shout. Regards Khukri ( talk  .  contribs ) 08:55, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Another Cplot Sock
You just indef blocked User:OpenTheDoor -- here's another one of her socks User:JudgmentDay. Morton devonshire 02:24, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Caught it already, thanks :) Nacon kantari  02:28, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Messed Up A Checkuser Report
Is there any way to fix this: Requests for checkuser/Case/Systemex. It's supposed to be Mr Bullockx as the original, not Systemex. Systemex is just the lastest user. I messed it up by mistake. : / -WarthogDemon 05:09, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Don't worry, it's fixed now :) Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 05:12, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 18th.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:17, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

202.154.255.1 open proxy
Hi. Thanks for blocking for 31 hours.

Since that's almost certainly an open proxy, once the block expires, this IP is pretty much a back door into Wikipedia. Given the long delays at WP:OP, could you consider a longer block? This will prevent further problems.

The address is already blocked by two of the major Internet blacklists -- see these Completewhois excerpts:
 * xbl.spamhaus.org	http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=202.154.255.1
 * cbl.abuseseat.org	Blocked - see http://cbl.abuseat.org/lookup.cgi?ip=202.154.255.1

Thanks! --A. B. (talk) 18:11, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
I appreciate you reverting the vandalism to my user page and blocking those annoying IP vandals. -- Scientizzle 20:09, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

CoolCat
I'm not sure what to do with this person's actions. He's filed a spurious RfC on me once, and he seems to have a very long history of disrupting Wikipeida, being blocked, and other things that would have gotten someone else permabanned a long time ago. However, I'm not willing to take any actions against him as he seems like a prolific contributor to the Wiki, and he is (looking over his RfC's) notorious for mediation techniques producing any change. I've tried to limit my interaction with this person, even pointing out on an AfD that his absence would hinder the ability to update the article. Now he's attacking my WikiProject for no other reason than he doesn't like me. Should I just continue to ignore him, or what? Asking for advice. --Elar a girl  Talk 20:46, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I'd advise you to ignore him. It's not worth the wasted time or effort.  Nacon kantari  20:48, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Easily done. :) --Elar a girl  Talk 21:08, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

proxy murder
that was the first time i put anything up for deletion and i admit the article was not the best candidate for speedy deletion, but what do you think should be done with the article then? Blueaster 04:37, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Perhaps you could try AFD.  Nacon kantari  04:39, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Deletion of South County CYT


Hello Naconkantari -

I would like an explanation of the South County CYT deletion. I have not recently requested a deletion. Thank you for your time.

Gray Crown

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Gray_Crown —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gray Crown (talk • contribs) 06:16, 20 December 2006 (UTC).
 * The deletion was requested by another editor. There was no content on the page.  Nacon kantari  06:39, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

SCM deletion
Hi Naconkantari,

could you please copy the contents of SCM (Scheme implementation) before deletion to my talk page. --MarSch 11:32, 20 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Thank you. I've improved the stub and recreated it. --MarSch 12:17, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Sunnyside Royal Hospital
Hi, you deleted article as speedy deletion category G12. However, neither the tag nor that the article had already been re-written was taken into account. There is a History page associated with each page in Wikipedia and this should help users determine the status of a page. Best regards → friedfish 15:41, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I saw both. If you feel the deletion was invalid, please use WP:DRV.  Nacon kantari  18:05, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Sunnyside Royal Hospital on deletion review
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Sunnyside Royal Hospital. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. friedfish 14:43, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Knights of Glory and Beer on deletion review
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Knights of Glory and Beer. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. The original editors are vehemently contesting the deletion on "Lots of people care a lot about this group" grounds. I know it isn't notability in the wikipedia sense, but they make claims on the talk page of the article that MAY lead one to think this group MIGHT be able to pass notability tests under WP:WEB and WP:N. I still hold no opinion (and considering the incivil way the article's creators are treating me, feeling rather altruisitic), but I listed it since I think it needs more review. It may still turn out to be non-notable, but we need more eyes on this one. Jayron 32 20:15, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Spam list
Hi,

I realize you are on a break, but I thought I'd pose this question to you for an answer at a later time. I ran into someting I hadn't before while editing an Article. I tried to add a source link to an Article, but got a message that said the link was on a "spam block list" (or something like that). The link looked pretty legitimate to me; it is a list of the family trees of famous Americans. I tried to provide you with the link to check it out, but I couldn't Save this message with the link included in it. The link includes the address 'ishipress.com'. The title of the link is "Family Trees of Thomas Jefferson and Other Famous Americans". Help!

Thanks,


 * Michael David 15:03, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank you ...
... for the message you sent to another user earlier tonight relating to a comment about me. I was just thinking a few days ago that my Wiki experience had overall been a very colleagial and pleasant one, so the last place I was expecting that kind of remark was on the Administrators' Noticeboard! Hopefully this situation won't recur. Regards, Newyorkbrad 03:16, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Geylang Methodist Secondary School
This was an out-of-process deletion, and consitutes abuse of admin power. Also, consider leaving proper edit summaries when you do a deletion. Also, consider notifying the creator of the article. Both avoid the impression of sneakiness. --Rob 18:32, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
 * It was clearly an A7 and I stated so in the deletion log. I apologize if you were confused with "A&", but I had kept the shift key down.  If you feel a deletion was incorrect, please use WP:DRV instead of accusing people of abuse.  Thanks,  Nacon kantari  21:36, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks.
Thanks for reverting vandalism of my user page by unknown IP. swadhyayee 01:50, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Complaint of vandalism on Hal Turner talk page
May I ask for the reason concerning the deletion of the topic "GNAA likely culprit behind attacks on Hal Turner Show 12.24.2006"?

The person had vandalized my second reply repeatedly. I provided the links to back up my assertion in an objective matter.

I ask that the topic be restored as it relates to the discussion to the recent attack on Hal Turner by the particular group, unless you've made your case why it cannot be reinstated with valid references to Wiki policies. G.O.L.A.Z. 03:34, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that, I didn't notice the vandalism.  Nacon kantari  03:36, 26 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your restoration of non-vandalized version. Please keep watch of the irresponsible person(s). Note the difference in two re-edits of the same topic by the same person (the "ip" user who teased me "oink oink oink" after I made a second edit comment). G.O.L.A.Z. 03:50, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

blacklist restriction
To avoid overly broad blocks, I have preemptively added a dot at the beginning of many spam blacklist entries (so that only the intended domain is blocked, not domains of which the name ends with the same). The following of your blocks have been changed thusly (new forms):


 * \.ho\.com\.ua
 * \.rdos\.net
 * \.coz\.in
 * \.5(3|4)\.pl
 * \.hepi\.pl
 * \.xhost\.ro
 * \.sufx\.net
 * \.3x\.ro
 * \.pochta\.ru
 * \.tvhosted\.com
 * \.gayhomes\.net
 * \.ipoo\.org
 * \.(?!jo)yu\.to
 * \.thima\.org
 * \.accim\.org
 * \.anzwers\.net
 * \.jw0\.info
 * \.coz\.in
 * \.abukir\.info
 * \.prv\.pl
 * \.westlord\.com
 * \.rapa\.jp
 * \.ewebet\.com
 * \.ses1\.info
 * \.nif1\.com
 * \.45\.kg
 * \.thea(s|p|t)\.info
 * \.rubite\.net
 * \.tabulas\.com
 * \.anyboard\.net
 * \.rollyo\.com
 * \.ton4all\.com
 * \.topege\.com
 * \.tatsoul\.com
 * \.aswev\.info
 * \.lenta\.com\.ua
 * \.pill[0-9]\.info
 * \.soduko\.org

I also removed the 'www' at the start of the following blocks:
 * \.box\.net\/public\/4y0dyzya43
 * \.internationalpenfriends\.net

I have removed the following block from the list; please replace it with a more specific one:
 * -coupons\.org

Finally I removed the blocking of newaf\.info because it was already blocked by the rule "\.new(a|e|i|o|u|y)[0-9a-z-]\.info"

Be well! - Andre Engels 01:01, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the update Nacon kantari  01:11, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 26th.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:21, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

User:Nnatan
I would like you to lift this block of Nnatan. While he made a stupid threat of disruption, he, didn't actually do anything towards his threat. I warned him that he will immediately blocked if he will do what he says. IMO it makes sense to make this person talk, rather than to corner him. `'mikka 07:33, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * That block has already expired. Nacon kantari  16:38, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Fred Kelly (artist)

 * User:Ymnoc has stated here that he intends to recreate this deleted article; it should be salted and the user should probably be blocked. Just a heads up. Danny Lilithborne 20:23, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads up, I'll keep a look out for it. Nacon kantari  20:26, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Block of User:FasterPussycatWooHoo
I'm unblocking this user, as the user had not been warned that his actions might lead to a block. While I agree that the edit in question was unacceptable, we've got to give a user at least one warning on his/her talk page before blocking, and the discussion at WP:AN/I had a rough consensus not to block. Let me know if you disagree. | Mr. Darcy talk 23:29, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, I do disagree but I will not reverse your unblock. I feel that one should be aware that their comments are unacceptable without having to read a policy page or having it explained to them that they shouldn't make uncivil comments.  Nacon kantari  23:49, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Just a heads up, this user has requested unblock. You may wish to go over and take a look at it :) Cheers. --Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 09:47, 28 December 2006 (UTC)


 * I agree. It seems a little early to conclude that the account is a spam-only account based on such a small number of edits.  Mango juice talk 13:28, 28 December 2006 (UTC)


 * This auto-block seems to be effecting User talk:Marco polo as well. HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 16:40, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Deletion of Two_Lumps
I just came back from vacation to find that our page had been deleted via WP:PROD. May I please contest this or at last request a readon why it was removed? Thanks!

Takhdrkqueen 21:29, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Contested PROD deletions can be restored per request. I have restored the article.  Thanks for contacting me.  Nacon kantari  21:34, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks so very much! I've edited the article to hopefully meet the criteria it was missing before. Thanks again for the fast assistance and information!

Takhdrkqueen 22:54, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Your block of Giano
What...? How it that a Personal Attack? Bishonen | talk 22:20, 28 December 2006 (UTC).
 * "I never talk behind people's backs - a concept I don't expect you to understand."  This is, to me, a clear personal attack on User:Doc glasgow.  Nacon kantari  22:24, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

So, the fact that he doesn't expect Doc Glasgow to understand is something he is not allowed to do? Would I be attacking you if I didn't expect you to understand the process necessary for a legitimate block that won't be overturned in only a few minutes, or would I be attacking you only if I said that? At what point is it his opinion to hold? Apparently, you do not think anyone is allowed to have a poor opinion of another and therefore think you are at some project without users. Geogre 02:46, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

User:CuerposDigitales
I've already put him on the Administrator intervention against vandalism page, on the basis of his blanking the page - as you can see, I've cycled through all the warnings. Tabercil 02:43, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

A call so bad as to qualify as an RFAR offense
Blocking Giano 1) without warning 2) for a "PA," when personal attacks are not a legitimate part of the blocking policy, 3) without discussion on WP:AN/I, 4) when AN/I and AN are in flames for frivolous blocks of Giano II, 5) when Jimbo just unblocked Giano II after a previous frivolous block, is so absolutely over the line, so entirely without justification as to be explainable only by the most profound ignorance or the most egregious willful attempt at disrupting Wikipedia. Please consider this an official warning that if you continue to try to provoke such dysfunction, you will be blocked and arbitrated.  Geogre 02:43, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Ridiculous comment. Jimbo already indicated Giano was drinking in last-chance saloon. He ignored the appeal for civility. Sorry, Geogre, your mate's free pass has now officially expired.--Docg 23:22, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * From WP:NPA, In extreme cases, an attacker may be blocked under the "disruption" clause of the blocking policy. If you would please read the block message again, Jimbo explicitly stated "I fully endorse the previous block".  I blocked because of the additional personal attack.  If you feel my actions were incorrect, please participate in the thread on WP:ANI about this instead of attacking me on my talk page.  Thanks  Nacon kantari  02:52, 29 December 2006 (UTC)


 * 1) It may be in extreme cases. An extreme case would be "you are a child molestor."  It would not be a snide comment.  That you can so far, so wholly, misinterpret both the word "may" and "extreme" is astonishing, if you're telling the truth.  That you entirely avoided following blocking policy is abusives, plain and simple.  Did you warn?  No.  Did you announce it at AN/I?  No.  Did you confer with any other administrator?  No.  Did you follow our rules?  No.  Is that how an administrator should behave?  No.  This is not an attack: this is a warning that you are in flagrant violation of Wikipedia policy.  Geogre 15:04, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't feel that this is how you should behave, either. If you have a problem with my actions, please take it up on ANI, RFC, or wherever you feel is appropriate.  Please stop attacking me on my talk page.  Thanks  Nacon kantari  15:14, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Vivek Narayanan
why did u delete my page i just wanted to promote my OPEN source software.Wikipedia is an open source project.An encyclopedia ANYONE can edit,not quite! Vivekn999 11:53, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Travis Fimmel
May I ask why this was deleted?--AshadeofgreyTalk 23:49, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for noticing that. I originally deleted it by looking at the tag and didn't notice that it was vandalism.  I have restored the article.   Nacon kantari  23:53, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Accidental removal of !vote from an afd?
Um, did you mean to do this? Bwithh 04:12, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, that user is blocked indef as a sockpuppet. Nacon kantari  04:14, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Ok then Bwithh 04:16, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

removal of my abuse report???
Why? See dif: --Jayron 32  05:02, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that, I must have accidentally selected more than one line. I've restored it.   Nacon kantari  05:04, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I did too. No prob.  Later.  --Jayron 32  05:06, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

POV-Because Template "Deletion Review"
Hi.

I saw you closed the "deletion review" I started for the POV-because template. Maybe it wasn't a good idea because technically the page was not deleted, however it was a subject of a Template for Deletion request, so I thought I could use it, but I guess not. However, I have got a big fat zero in terms of replies to my queries on the talk page for the template, and that also contributed to it due to my frustration (and I'd still like a response, indeed.). But I apologize for any inconvenience the "review request" may have caused. 74.38.35.171 08:55, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Help me block this guy?
Though I've been around here for a while, I don't know how to block or petition to block. The user in question is "24.5.86.161". I'm asking you to help as you previously left an ultimatum on his talk page, warning to block him the next time he vandalized. Well, he's vandalized 16 times now, and he's getting subtle too. Best to nip this one in the bud, I think.

Thanks, --Karch 18:46, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Your deletion of the article Arden Automobilbau GmbH
Hi. I noticed you deleted an article I created. In the deltion log, you don't invoke any reason for deleting it. I don't know the deletion criterion by heart, but I do know them enough to wonder why would an editor would delete it. Please clarify that with me. By the way, using a full lenght reason rather than a code like "G11" or "W169" would definitely be more helpful to other users for identifying the reason of the deletion of their articles, especially to those who don't want to search for those codes everytime, or learn them by heart, and that would surely diminish the amounts of requests you get later on, hehe. Thanks. Dread Specter 21:33, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Status site
After spending the afternoon implementing blocking code, I went in and deleted the spam as well as banning 50+ IPs. They shouldn't be a problem now, if anyone spams, just contact me and I'll ban them too. :-) &mdash; Edward Z. Yang (Talk) 22:37, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the update! I hope that solves most of the problem.  Nacon kantari  23:10, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank you
Sorry, I was very tired and having not edited within WIKI for a long time didn't even notice what you had done :/ I apologize for my tiredness, my poor spelling and typing :).

Again, thank again. --Wolfit 07:41, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Regarding TV on The Radio Article
I'm sorry to bother you again but the user we discussed yesterday has once again reversed the changes to the site - this time reversing your edit :/

They have also raised something called a :Mediation Cabal/Cases/12-31 TV on The Radio Irrelevant EL. Which I have tried to reply to. I have to say its NY eve here and due to this my prose may not bbe at its best :/

But could you please look into this again?

Sorry to bother you at this time. --Wolfit 23:00, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

ebooksw
Some entries on the list may be more or less dubious--there isn't a very clear line at times, but explorion at least is not spam. Please look at the content--it is a good specialized repository. (We can discuss the others later.) As you will be able to tell from the edits, I am no friend of spam, to say the least. My primary criterion is the amount of mainstream material. Please discuss on the article's talk page as customary before making further deletions. DGG 02:20, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

User block request problem
Arrgh... I've tried a dozen combinations and none of them get the template to fill in correctly... If you would check the main page for the vandal, I'm trying to report User:Legend=me, but the name keeps coming up as "Example User". Could you please take a look at that, and then tell me why this user name just won't propogate correctly! Thanks! SkierRMH 03:54, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

stop edit warring
Why do you insist on deleting articles i post?
 * Please see WP:BIO. Nacon kantari  04:38, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

HeavenGames
Could you please tell me why this article was deleted. It had no AfD notice. I was working on cleaning it up yesterday, and today it's gone. Havok (T/C/e/c) 07:15, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry about that, it was a misapplied use of WP:CSD A7. I have restored the article.   Nacon kantari  07:23, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Ah, ok. Thank you. By the way, would it be possible to get it semi-protected, if you check the log, there has been some problems with people vandalizing the article. Havok (T/C/e/c) 07:26, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Sure, sprotected. Nacon kantari  07:32, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Happy new year. :) Havok (T/C/e/c) 07:45, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Deletion review
An editor is attempting to challenge the deletion of Mexican Folkloric Dance at Deletion review/Log/2007 January 2. I have no particular involvement in this; I'm just informing you since you were the deleting admin. --Metropolitan90 08:12, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Can you chime in on this? I can find no evidence of copyvio. ~ trialsanderrors 18:31, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Your block of Wariovvare-2007
Wariovvare-2007, who you blocked, has made an   request on his talk page. Please respond to it.Eli Falk 09:04, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Re: Block of
Clerk note &bull; In addition to the well-placed username block you gave the user, I would like to inform you that a recent Request for CheckUser revealed this to one of many sockpuppets made by sockpuppeteer. Cheers, ✎ Peter M Dodge  (  Talk to Me  &bull;  Neutrality Project  ) 17:50, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Spamming?
You have no leg to stand on. There is nothing wrong with linking to WikIran articles. Exactly what is your problem? Khodavand 23:30, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Continued spamming of any link is against WP:SPAM and WP:EL and is grounds for a block. Please stop adding your website to other articles and instead request that it be included on the article's talk page.

Deletion of 'Metra Electronics'
Hi, you recently deleted the article I created about Metra Electronics. I am guessing the reason you deleted it is that I only cited one source which was the company's website. While this was the only source I used, I believe there is still a good reason for this article to exist. When going to the Metra Electronics website, it is not easy to get a good idea of what the company does. They have products listed, but instead of using regular names like 'wiring harness' they use their own fancy names like 'turbowire.' Also, the "About" section of the website offers a letter from the president that talks about their latest advances, and does not give the visitor much information about the company itself. I made this article as a summary of the information I gleaned from their website as well as tidbits from other sites online. I believe it is valuable in that regard. I was planning on expanding the article as well, and including a list and small amount of info on Metra's child companies.

Martopg 05:06, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * If you feel I deleted an article in error, please use WP:DRV. Thanks  Nacon kantari  05:07, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Delete
Hi, I was looking at the page that says "Recent changes" and I saw that you were deleting a lot of stuff. How do I do that? Thank you and have a nice day.--MHRTWR 05:40, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I use a script that is hosted on the toolserver to help me clear the massive backlogs. Nacon kantari  05:51, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

A request for assistance
Would you support the concept of moving the Earhart "myths" to a separate page or article? The reason for my suggesting this is that the main article should be an accurate and scholarly work while the speculation and conspiracy theories surrounding the disappearance of Amelia Earhart are interesting, they belong in a unique section. Most researchers, as you know, discount the many theories and speculation that has arisen in the years following her last flight. Go onto the Earhart discussion page and register your vote/comments...and a Happy New Year to you as well. Bzuk 05:52 3 January 2007 (UTC).

Ohio Valley Wrestling roster
Hi Naconkantari, could you please give me the content of this deleted article so I can merge it into the World Wrestling Entertainment roster please? semper fi — Moe  06:03, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I have posted it here. Thanks  Nacon kantari  06:04, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you! semper fi — Moe  06:07, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Deletion summaries
Hi, I have noticed that you often provide only a very short abbreviated deletion summary when you delete pages (like "a7" "nn-bio" and similar). Please keep in mind that most users do not know all of Wikipedia's speedy deletion criteria by heart. Please consider providing a brief "plain English" explanation without relying exclusively on "CSD jargon". Additionally linking to the relevant criteria so people can read it in full can also be useful, for example. This will help a "layperson" better understand why something was deleted when looking at the deletion log.

Most browsers have a autocomplete or other "form filling" features that allow pre-prepared boil plate texts to be inserted into web forms with just a few keystrokes. This is useful for inserting detailed deletion summaries without having to type out the same things over and over. Please consider looking into it. Thanks. -- Longhair\talk 06:52, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 2nd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:32, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Waterman Studios
Hey, I was just wondering why you deleted my page on waterman studios? Thanks Mrx9898 09:02, 3 January 2007 (UTC) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mrx9898 (talk • contribs) 08:42, 3 January 2007 (UTC).
 * Please see WP:N and WP:CORP. Thanks Nacon kantari  15:50, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Page Deletion
Hi! Why did you delete this page? Please respond on MY talk. WikiMan53 T/C e@ edits 15:15, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Unfougwa page deletion
I would like to have the page I made on Unfougwa undeleted if possible. While it may seem like that page was nonsense, it is an entirely real comic. I have the comic I can show you if you don't believe me. Please respond on my talk as soon as possible. --Dovecoon 15:32, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Please see WP:N. Thanks Nacon kantari  15:49, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Protection on MAS
Hi, could you please make an edit to this template that you recently protected? Some of the garbage left over from a previous vandalism is still causing problems. Please remove this text: The result should only be this:. Look at the medal table at 1974 Asian Games for one example of how the extraneous code messes things up. Thanks. Andrwsc 18:22, 3 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Thank you! Andrwsc 18:30, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

SPAM #10 (clown meat)
A deletion review in which you participated has been relisted: Articles for deletion/Rafed.net (2nd nomination). brenneman 02:09, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

User:The Alter
He's requesting an unblock with the unblock. I can't find anything in contribs, so I assume there's more to it than I can find. So, I will leave it up to you to make a decision, since I know nothing about it. -Royalguard11 (Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 02:58, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * User:The Regime too apparently. -Royalguard11 (Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 03:00, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I blocked both for using their userpages as a blog/chat page. If they won't do this anymore, I've got no problem with them being unblocked.  Nacon kantari  03:12, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Changing Article or User Name
I am a newbie to wiki. I created an account with the User name of Nicjord. I wanted the article to be named Nicole Jordan, a published romance author, but did not see a place to create a page name until after I wrote the article. I created a new page with her full name and pasted the article in there, but it was later deleted. So, I created a new account under the user name of Nicole Jordan. It would not let me enter the article info there. So now I'm back to this account, scratching my head as to what to do. The article will contain a list of her books, and a link to her web site. How can I get this accomplished without it later being deleted? And, which account shall I use for the article? Any help you can give me will be humbly appreciated. Nicjord 07:59, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Nerd Boy afd
Your "vote" makes no sense to me. Nerd Boy is easily the most notable and popular ascii art webcomic. It produced more than 600 issues. It is all written in the article. If this is not notability, I don't know what is. I wonder whether you've read the article at all. Notice the interwikis too.  Grue  08:05, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
I've had two inappropriate sockpuppet accusations made against me and you've reverted them both. Thanks. But how does one participate in controversial topics without having nutjobs make false accusations? It gets so tiresome, that it makes me not want to participate, except that's how people force their viewpoints by making it such a difficulty, people just give up. Anyways, I appreciate your help. Orangemarlin 01:22, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

I'm under accusation by the same editor as well, and with the same grounds. N6 02:47, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Unsure About An External Link
An IP user has just added an external link: to the article Veronica Finn. Given the fact that it doesn't appear to intentionally be promoting anything (and actually helps verify some of the information in the article), is it an okay external link or should I remove it? -WarthogDemon 03:57, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * If it's not a commercial link and the person who added it is not the owner of the site, it's probably ok. I'd make a note on the talk page, though, if there are any concerns.  Nacon kantari  04:09, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Would like to appeal an article you deleted Rob Tornoe
Hello, I have a helpme on my talkpage because I believe this political cartoonist, Rob Tornoe, is notable. Here is what I wrote:

How do I appeal a speedy delete? I came across an article earlier this evening (just after it was created). I considered nominating it for AfD but when I saw the quality Yahoo hits he got, I put on the talkpage to put in some good quality third party references besides the one blog and his own website. It did not appear to me this was self-published. I noticed on my watchpage the nom for Speedy Delete and went to the page and put hangon. I went to talkpage and entered the following (the article is gone but I have not closed the talkpage I editted and saved):

Talk:Rob Tornoe From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search

Non-cur speedy delete. This cartoonist gets a lot of quality hits on Yahoo's searth engine. This is a political cartoonist who seems to be noteworthy - otherwise, I would have AfD'ed the article when I first visited the page (CfA). I do not know this individual and my POV is neutral - other than I enjoy cartoons. Ronbo76 05:13, 5 January 2007 (UTC) (Please check my contribution log to confirm).

I had planned on building one reference source with a good hit I got for him, which is the first Yahoo internet search hit for Rob Tornoe cartoonist. The first hit is: AAEC - Cartoonist Profile Rob Tornoe. That page, which is the The Association of American Editorial Cartoonists with a date of 2005. It has a good pic of him and much of the info that was in his article Rob tornoe (built with a "small T".

Trust me: if I had even a doubt about this cartoonist, I would have AfD'ed the article. Take a look at the top of my Talkpage and userpage if you have any doubts about me. Someone was too quick on the Speedy Delete as it came after I put the hangon and finished the article talkpage for the second time. How do I appeal this one???

BTW in the type it took to type in this the talkpage in the preview window went red indicating it got deleted too. I still have that window open (as posted above). Please help me as this guy seems deserving of an entry. Ronbo76 05:28, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Would you please reconsider? Ronbo76 05:40, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Sure. Article restored. Nacon kantari  05:44, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

You deleted an entire talk page
You deleted the entire talk page for the Li Hongzhi article. The deletion tag says: deleted "Talk:Li Hongzhi" (Image with unknown source as of 28 December 2006). This tells me that you made some kind of mistake. Care to give the article back it's talk page? Mcconn 05:48, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Kittinger jump
You apparently deleted. The deletion summary: deleted "Image:Kittinger-jump2.jpg" (I8) is pretty meaningless to me. Where can I find the decoding table? Also this pic is currently Featured Picture Candidate in the evaluation process, and I imagine the sudden deletion left a lot of people pretty confused. I realize that you probably are a busy admin, but a tiny note or a slightly more detailed deletion log entry would be appreciated. Best, Dschwen 08:40, 5 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Hm, I found a table on Criteria_for_speedy_deletion but there is no I8... --Dschwen 08:42, 5 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Ah well, never mind, solved the riddle. I found the pic on commons, so my guess is you deleted an en.wp copy. --Dschwen 08:52, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

HP online
Can i write the page as a ????????????

Dell970 17:38, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Daily Domainer
Hi Naconkantari, I see that you deleted Daily Domainer. Could you keep an eye on Domaining as well. Thanks. --BostonMA talk 20:21, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Capital IQ
I'm not sure why you deleted this page, Capital IQ, You deleted it seconds after it was created, before anyone had a change to expand it

Evanreiser 21:28, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Ok i see why it was deleted, it was written in a advertising way, It has been updated since

Evanreiser 21:48, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

editbar buttons
Hi, you deleted several editbar buttons. I have restored them. They are used on every edit page and should not be left unprotected at Commons. Cheers, —Ruud 23:49, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image:NormandyLST.jpeg
You deleted a featured picture with no explanation. Why? Ydorb 23:58, 5 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The image is now located at Image:1944 NormandyLST.jpg. —Ruud 00:16, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

image deletions
Great job clearing that category! --Fang Aili talk 01:35, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Request for for speedy deletion.
Requesting an article to be deleted.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Party_for_Socialism_and_Liberation

68.161.73.206 02:13, 6 January 2007 (UTC) 68.161.73.206
 * Please see WP:AFD for the procedure to have an article deleted. Thanks  Nacon kantari  02:21, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

William Sledd
Why did you RE-delete an article that had ALREADY gone through the undeletion process? The William Sledd article. --Arislan 02:26, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The article was deleted here and the deletion was endorsed here. Nacon kantari  02:33, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * It was discussed, deleted, re-discussed and UNDELETED since who knows when. Why would you randomly delete it? Just because a vandal put a tag on it?--Arislan 05:02, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Deleted via Expired Prod?
I just noticed a page about our company JN Productions has been deleted via Expired Prod? The page has been on the Wikipedia for well over a year (maybe longer). I was hoping to get a more through explanation why the page was deleted? Did someone maliciously remove the page? Jnproductions 05:39, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Please see WP:PROD regarding the proposed deletion system. Thanks  Nacon kantari  05:51, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I would advise to give a more descriptive deltion summary (e.g. "Expired Prod: A non notable company. Fails WP:CORP.  Most likely created as an advert by user jnproductions.  Note they did not create the games, just put them on to are one DVD.") as this is the only piece of information non-admins can get about a deleted article. —Ruud 12:58, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I provide a link to the WP:PROD page. As I go through the category rather quickly, I don't have time to provide a personal message for each one.  Nacon kantari
 * WP:PROD only explains what PROD is, not why a certain article was proposed for deletion. I usually copy the reason for the from the prod tag itself. This only takes a few second, which is nothing compared to the time it takes to asses if the article really is a non-controversial deletion candidate (this step is quite an important step of the proposed deletion process), to check if the article really has been up for proposed deletion for several days and was not vandalizes, hasn't been VfD, AfD or Prodded before and to see which articles link to the article being deleted. To be honest, your response worries me. —Ruud 22:39, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

IPs in the UAE still blocked
Hello Nacontari, You appear to be reading this page so presumably you read the previous message about blocking of IPs in the UAE. They're still blocked though and it's not clear why. As mentioned previously, internet users in the UAE have no legal choice apart from using proxy provided by the ISP here. Please could you not block UAE IPs. Thank you.

"Your account or IP address has been blocked from editing. You were blocked by Naconkantari for the following reason (see our blocking policy):

This IP address has been blocked because it is believed to be an open proxy or zombie computer. To prevent abuse, editing from these proxies is currently prohibited. If your ISP has misconfigured their proxy, you can try bypassing it by logging into Wikimedia's secure gateway at https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/. For more information about open proxies and what you can do, please see the WikiProject on open proxies. (Multi-RBL lookup • VCN proxycheck) Your IP address is 213.42.2.21."

11:52, 6 January 2007 (UTC)


 * I unblocked the IP, I don't think Wikipedia can use another appearance in the media, because we again blocked an entire country. If you believe this really is being abuse as an open proxy (in the sense that people from outside the UAE can edit using this address) you should probably raise this on Ruud'' 12:49, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

anyboard.net
I have removed anyboard.net from your list from the spam blacklist, because it was being used in a valid way. I would have preferred to restrict the block, but the link you provided to the spam because of which it was added, does not lead to a valid revision any more. - Andre Engels 12:54, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Cleanup after yourself
When deleting images, like in the case of Julianna Rose Mauriello, delete the references to those images, please. -- Zanimum 14:14, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Deleted pentagon picture
Hi, I was wondering why you never notified me that Image:Pentagon precollapse.jpg was up for deletion, or that you deleted it. I should have been notified on my talk page. Fresheneesz 20:50, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The image was speedy deleted in November because it lacked a fair-use rationale. Nacon kantari  02:31, 7 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Yea, I obviously realize that now. How am I supposed to object to a speedy deletion if noone tells me its getting deleted? Fresheneesz 02:48, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

William Sledd
Please can you fill me in on the details of the AFD, i missed it. What is G4? It was recreated with the provision of extra new coverage. frummer 23:39, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I've restored the article; deleting it under G4 is not proper, as it has changed significantly since the AfD. Please check a topic's history before deleting it under G4. EVula // talk // &#9775;  // 00:33, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

User:Ed/Kindness
I sent you a copy of the email I received from the page owner...via email.--Ed  ¿Cómo estás? Reviews? 00:56, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of Royal Australian Navy ship badges
Could you please tell me why a large number of Royal Australian Navy ship's badges were deleted on the 29th December? As far as I am aware, all of the images following the title format "Image:HMAS ship crest.gif" had a copyright status template, a fair use template, and a fair use justification... see Image:HMAS stuart crest.gif for an example of the templating and justification used. -- saberwyn 03:55, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * When the copyright information was added, the tag saying that there was no copyright information was not removed. This left the image in the category for deletion.  I'll see what I can do about restoring them.   Nacon kantari  04:07, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks muchly! -- saberwyn 22:26, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Flag deletions
As I'm sure you are aware, the coatofarms template was deleted on December 12 (though it is still an open case at Deletion review, leaving many coat-of-arms, flags, seals, etc. without a copyright tag. Notified was sent to the original uploaders but some have not been around. I changed the ones I knew about but missed these that you deleted: and  As noted in the Whatlinkshere these two were being used in articles pertaining to their subject. Can you please undelete these (preferably with correct spelling, or a more standard image name) and add the appropriate copyright tag, symbol (or seal)? Thanks. ·maclean 07:28, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Change Article Name or User Name Account
I am a newbie to wiki. I created an account with the User name of Nicjord. I wanted the article to be named Nicole Jordan, a published romance author, but did not see a place to create a page name until after I wrote the article. I created a new page with her full name and pasted the article in there, but it was later deleted. So, I created a new account under the user name of Nicole Jordan. It would not let me enter the article info there. So now I'm back to this account, scratching my head as to what to do. The article will contain a list of her books, and a link to her web site. How can I get this accomplished without it later being deleted? And, which account shall I use for the article? Any help you can give me will be humbly appreciated. Nicjord 08:04, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Thornbury
Why did you delete: 02:55, 6 January 2007 Naconkantari (Talk | contribs) deleted "Image:ThornburyCoatOfArms.jpg" (Image with unknown copyright status as of 29 December 2006) ??

The image had been there for 2 years without dispute and as far as I am aware was OK. (But as you have now deleted it, I cannot check ...... where on earth do deleted items go and how can one check them?)
 * Johnbibby 09:17, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

You deleted an entire talk page

 * I'm reposting this because nothing was said or done about it. Mcconn 07:13, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

You deleted the entire talk page for the [Li Hongzhi] article. The deletion log says: deleted "Talk:Li Hongzhi" (Image with unknown source as of 28 December 2006). This tells me that you made some kind of mistake. Care to give the article back it's talk page? Mcconn 05:48, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I thought I had restored that when it was brought to my attention the first time. I'm very sorry about the delay.   Nacon kantari  15:30, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

No problem. Thanks! Mcconn 00:28, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Dale K. Marieiro
Note that Dale K. Marieiro was a user page that (apparently) a vandal moved to the article namespace. Maybe we should check how to clear the mess that is currently reported at AIV? -- ReyBrujo 02:22, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 8th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:56, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Namir Deiter
Namir Deiter was speedily deleted last week. I contend that it this was unwarranted. Comic was published in book form by Studio Ironcat, was nominated for an Ursa Major award, and has been around over seven years. I don't feel that it is patently non-notable and deserves a proper AfD vote, if not restoration. Terra Misu 14:22, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
 * If you have a problem with a deletion, please use WP:DRV. Nacon kantari  16:14, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Why was my page deleted?
First, thanks for your work to maintain this wonderful resource we all enjoy.

I recently posted a page about Bioinformatics Solutions Inc. which was removed. I think it was seen to be too commercial, promoting BSI products. Whereas my intention was simple information about the background of the company. There are articles like this for many companies, which give history of the company, and what it's known for (like Research in Motion (RIM) -- another Waterloo Ontario based company.

Perhaps you can suggest how my article might be approved?

IainRogers 15:11, 9 January 2007 (UTC) IainR

galeon.com
I have removed galeon.com from the spam blacklist. It's been on so long that the structure of the site has changed (the link that was spammed with is not the type that works nowadays). The same might hold for the content. - Andre Engels 16:43, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Tales of the Questor deletion
Deletion log reads: 17:46, 3 January 2007 Naconkantari (Talk | contribs) deleted "Tales of the Questor" (A7)

I haven't found the AfD log for this title, but I can't see any grounds for deletion. The comic has been running for five years, has clocked up somewhere between 300 and 400 pages and a print collection and receives almost uniformly positive reviews despite its creator's sometimes controversial rl political opinions.

I'm not quite paranoid enough to believe that politics was the reason for the article's deletion, but I am certainly paranoid enough to believe it got crapped on unfairly.

Lee M 20:58, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * There was no deletion discussion for the page. It was speedily deleted for failing to assert notability.  Please see WP:DRV for more information on restoring the page.   Nacon kantari  22:49, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy deletion is by definition undemocratic.
 * PROPOSAL: when an article is being considered for deletion, all registered users who have made edits to it in (say) the past 6 months should be consulted via their User Talk pages. Lee M 00:15, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Signature problem?
Er, I haven't got a specialised signature, so guarantee that I've not used templates in them. I don't know how!

That box is blank and unchecked, I just sign using either  (talk • contribs) or the four tildes.

I can only think of one edit for which the time was wrong and that was because I forgot to sign and realised an hour or so afterwards. Rather than leave it unsigned I just signed it again, which unfortunately screwed up the timing. But not significantly enough I don't think to do much damage.

Please direct me to the edit concerned, and show me what I've done - I can't see anything other than what I've mentioned, and if you are going to warn me on a day when I've made more edits than any other since I registered it's common courtesy to demonstrate the incident's location, given you can hardly claim I've done it often. I don't mean to breach WP:CIVIL but that does annoy me. I don't like the idea of being warned when I've just tried to make genuine edits. And if the concern is my use of the test banner in warning users, that was never a signature I thought I was using a genuine shortcut.

Addyboy 01:29, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Updated as I've updated it on my own talk page. I await your reply, on my page preferably thanks. Addyboy 01:44, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Namir_Deiter on deletion review
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Namir_Deiter. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Terra Misu 12:46, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

The Suburban Jungle on deletion review
An editor has asked for a deletion review of The Suburban Jungle. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Terra Misu 12:46, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Bobbins on deletion review
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Bobbins. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Terra Misu 12:46, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Tumbler Ridge coa.png on deletion review
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Image:Tumbler Ridge coa.png. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. maclean 04:26, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Games from The Legend of Zelda series
You recently deleted Games from The Legend of Zelda series (R3). Can you tell me what the content of this page was? --- RockMFR 21:24, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Nacon kantari 21:49, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) redirect The Legend of Zelda (series)
 * Did either that page or The Legend of Zelda series games have any significant history? Were they merged into any other articles? --- RockMFR 22:47, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

re: signature
I would like to tell you that I have change my signature, best regards --dario vet (talk) 07:56, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

A Doemain of Our Own
An editor has asked for a deletion review of A Doemain of Our Own. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 04:57, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

spam blacklist changes (again)
I have restricted the following blocks:
 * prv\.pl to bxava\.prv\.pl
 * xoomer\.alice\.it to xoomer\.alice\.it\/dynamixpro and xoomer\.alice\.it\/iokimo

Both are quite popular free homepage providers, which seem to have been linked for valid reasons as well. - Andre Engels 09:03, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Userspace Restoration Request
Never mind --Nekura 03:14, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 15th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:59, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Proxy
modlibrary.net appears to be offering a web proxying service, e.g. modlibrary.net/proxy/index.php?q=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5kZWNsYXJhdGlvbm9maW5kZXBlbmRlbnRzLm5ldC9kb2kvcGFnZXMveHB3c2QuaHRtbA--&hl=1111101001 which redirects to a recently blacklisted site. Will this proxy allow anonymised eidting? If so it may need tracing and blocking.

Another: www.waterfordhomeschool.org/index.php?q=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5kZWNsYXJhdGlvbm9maW5kZXBlbmRlbnRzLm5ldC9kb2kvcGFnZXMveHB3YmFyYmVyYXVnLmh0bWw-&hl=1111101001

Both advertise as open proxies.


 * Update: both now on the spam blacklist, but the question of whether edits from these IPs need to be prevented remains to be answered - I strongly suspect that the answer is yes. Guy (Help!) 13:34, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Guess what?
You said I vandalised, and yes, i do use google toolbar.

Multiple deletions for which I would like the content
You deleted Namir Deiter, Bobbins, and Tales of the Questor, and I would appreciate it if you could place the contents either on my user page or to Lithorien(at)Gmail.com. Thank you. Lithorien 05:12, 18 January 2007 (UTC)