User talk:Naldis253

Welcome!
Hello, Naldis253, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Marcie Leeds, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Electric Catfish 21:54, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Marcie Leeds


The article Marcie Leeds has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Electric Catfish 21:54, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Marcie Leeds


A tag has been placed on Marcie Leeds requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Theo polisme  22:02, 31 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy deletion


 * Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia.
 * I'm sorry, but this has been deleted as meeting WP:CSD. Generally, articles are speedily deleted when there is no assertion of significance or they fall into things to avoid.


 * Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources providing verifiable information. That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written about the subject. Searching Google is the best place to start. Sometimes articles are deleted because they contain content copyrighted elsewhere. Such content can be used as a source of information, but the content here must be completely rewritten from scratch. Any deficiencies with notability, sourcing, or things to avoid should be remedied before reposting as they can lead to repeated deletions.


 * For basic information on beginning to write an article see User:Dloh/new.
 * Sourcing is incredibly important for an encyclopedia. You will need reliable sources providing verifiable information. Be sure to list your sources at the bottom of the article.
 * For more general information about the deletion process, please see User:Dlohcierekim/deletion
 * If you believe the subject does in fact meet notability guidelines with reliable sources providing verifiable information, please contact me on my talk page.


 * Please read--
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * How to write a great article
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages



There is useful information at--
 * Biographies of living persons
 * Manual of Style
 * Policy on neutral point of view
 * Guideline on external links
 * Guideline on conflict of interest


 * If you wish to make test edits or work on the article before creating it, you can create a test page at User:/sandbox and consider using the Article Wizard to guide you through the creation process. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page
 * Cheers, and happy editing. Dloh cierekim  23:55, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Cheers, and happy editing. Dloh cierekim  23:55, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Source searches

 * Google News
 * Google Book Search
 * Google Scholar
 * NewsLibrary.com


 * FindArticles.com
 * World Cat
 * Wikipedia Reference Search by the WRS project
 * Political Graveyard


 * Thepaperboy.com
 * Reliable newspapers
 * Wikipedia: List of free online resources

Speedy deletion nomination of Orla gartland


A tag has been placed on Orla gartland requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  — Francophonie&#38;Androphilie (Je vous invite à me parler ) 17:36, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

November 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Orla gartland, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you.  — Francophonie&#38;Androphilie (Je vous invite à me parler ) 17:40, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  — Francophonie&#38;Androphilie (Je vous invite à me parler ) 17:44, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Orla Gartland.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Orla Gartland.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Rcsprinter  (talk)  @ 17:56, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Before you do anything else (on here, that is...)
you need to read WP:BAND which is about musicians (not just bands). It tells you what we think is notable and what isn't. This is an encyclopaedia, you see, not social media like Facebook. We have standards for what gets articles and what doesn't. And we need things to be referenced, too. On Facebook, it's left up to you. We need to be able to verify that things are right. Look at WP:RS (reliable independent sources]] to see what is needed. Not many people on YouTube get articles, because so few meet our standards for the RS bit. (Or the BAND bit, either...) The number of views means very little - it's too easy to fiddle viewing figures. Your first article was deleted because it was a copyright violation. You need to read WP:COPYVIO about that. Basically, if it's been published somewhere (and being online is published), it can't be brought into here. There reasons - if you don't understand the policy tell me and I'll make it easier. There might have notability problems there too. Not every child performer is notable. Emma Watson, yes. Someone playing the part of a baby in a soap, no. In between, well, each case gets decided on its own merits - but if there are no RS, there's no article. That's 100% certain for living people. (99.5% certain if they're dead, but you're not allowed to shoot them to make them notable.) Do research before trying again, and ask for advice. We'd rather spend time helping people than deleting things. A lot of people won't ask for help. They quite often get blocked, because not listening to good advice can be regarded as vandalism. That's the way it is here - very friendly to newcomers if they ask for help and take advice, or liable to delete and block if they won't. Peridon (talk) 18:53, 17 November 2012 (UTC)