User talk:Naldo247

Ysabel Bisnath
Hello. I saw your removal from the above-linked article. Normally, I would revert this removal (and somebody else might anyways) but the sources cited all appear to be down or usurped at the moment so I have left it. Generally, if reliable published sources exist for a topic on Wikipedia, we are obligated to leave it in (ensuring that our coverage is acceptable per our standards, in this case WP:BLP, WP:GNG and WP:NPOV are key) - this is regardless of the desires or whims of the person covered, in most cases. If there is good coverage of something, and it can be deemed notable, it belongs here, even if the person who is the subject does not want it to be here. All that aside, the article in its present state (without coverage of the Ms. World involvement) does not have a credible claim of significance and runs the risk of deletion under criterion A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion - by removing this content, you may make the article unworthy of retention. I just wanted to mention this. ASUKITE 04:19, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Ysabel Bisnath for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ysabel Bisnath is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ysabel Bisnath until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PrimalBlueWolf (talk) 06:21, 9 August 2021 (UTC)