User talk:Namayan/Archive 05

Re: Legislative districts of Bacoor & Imus
If Dasmariñas was able to get its own legislative district by name but it is still within under Cavite's representation (it being considered the 4th district), shouldn't it be the same for Bacoor & Imus as these are lone districts as well? That just puts Dasmariñas, Imus & Bacoor in equal footing.

In fact, campaign materials of Lani Mercado & Del Abaya that I saw in some presses indicate "For Congress(wo)man, (Lone) District of Bacoor" not "2nd District of Cavite".

I will fight the stupidity that you created when you nominated the two articles for deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reyrefran (talk • contribs)

Sockpuppet investigations/Scorpion prinz
A case has been brought against you, and you may wish to comment. ~ Amory ( u •  t  •  c ) 14:44, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ph seal dinagat islands basilisa.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Ph seal dinagat islands basilisa.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.


 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.


 * If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.


 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 07:15, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ph seal dinagat islands loreto.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Ph seal dinagat islands loreto.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.


 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.


 * If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.


 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 09:32, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ph seal dinagat islands libjo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Ph seal dinagat islands libjo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.


 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.


 * If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.


 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:20, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Test drive for separate articles per legislative district
See Talk:Legislative districts of Manila. – Howard  the   Duck  15:39, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ph seal cavite tagaytay city.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Ph seal cavite tagaytay city.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:15, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:33, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ph seal rizal antipolo city.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Ph seal rizal antipolo city.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk  03:41, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ph seal cavite bacoor.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Ph seal cavite bacoor.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:01, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Legislative districts, redux
Hey are you in to re-formatting of the various legislative district articles. Although we'd still leave blanks for political parties especially those pre-21st century, those can have some improvements such as using one table/district instead of separate tables when an LGU is added/removed/changed. Also, we can add results from the 2010 election. Let's use the American congressional districts as a model. – HTD  ( ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens. ) 18:03, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately I hate the way some LGU articles are appearing right now with election results, not that I'm saying it's irrelevant, but it appears we're becoming so obsessed with tables rather than real articles themselves, I find too much clutter if that's gonna take place. --Scorpion prinz (Talk 18:37, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Heh. However vote results seem to be the norm for district articles, unlike for LGU articles. The old suggestion (the one I made in April) is still on the table. – HTD  ( ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens. ) 04:42, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
 * My position has not changed. It will just be tons of article stubs, which can be gathered in 1 single article. I don't see the need. --Scorpion prinz (Talk 10:48, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I was planning for them to be retained in their respective articles, only the manner of presentation will be different. – HTD  ( ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens. ) 13:12, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
 * If you won't object, I'd be changing the Legislative district of Abra article to the proposed format. – HTD  ( ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens. ) 04:05, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, most of the city articles that don't need the word "city" in their titles were moved. It's a good idea to start moving their corresponding district articles to the new names too, such as Legislative district of San Jose del Monte City to Legislative district of San Jose del Monte. – HTD  ( ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens. ) 05:36, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * You may also want to edit this article: List of special elections to the Philippine Congress. – HTD  ( ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens. ) 12:34, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The section 13th Senator is an analysis. --Scorpion prinz (Talk 18:59, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Is sourced. And we'd need other special elections specially on the House section. – HTD  ( ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens. ) 04:03, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Appears editorial like to me, not encyclopedic.--Scorpion prinz (Talk 09:18, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * It's simplified now. – HTD  ( ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens. ) 09:51, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Looking at the Abra legislative district, it's really harder to understand it. Though I know a lot of lists have migrated to that format I find it fine, though on the local front it will create a lot of room to monitor the changes in political affiliation, which cannot be guaranteed all the time, rendering the article outdated. I just don't think there is a need to include a remarks column, a footnote will do. This is the same with the 15th Congress where the senators would have to be labelled whether they're part of the majority and minority which cannot be paralled in the House, simply because they vote for their chamber's presiding officer? --Scorpion prinz (Talk 01:05, 26 November 2010 (UTC)