User talk:NameAnon

August 2020
Hello, I'm Noq. I noticed that you recently removed content from Dilnawaz Khan without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. noq (talk) 20:02, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Dilnawaz Khan, you may be blocked from editing. noq (talk) 20:53, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

These edits were incorrect and were made just to malign the image, I made the changes accordingly. NameAnon (talk) 20:55, 31 August 2020 (UTC)


 * You removed sourced content. Do not do that. If the sources are contested, you could add additional WP:reliable sources that show the alternative view.  You can use the article talk page to argue for removing the sourced content but do not do that without gaining consensus per WP:PRD. noq (talk) 21:00, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Dilnawaz Khan. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. noq (talk) 21:01, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

This page is belongs to myself, someone has blocked me for editing, that is why I'm using a new ID for this. These edits were made purposely to demean my image, and the references were out of context. I will edit it till these errors will rectified. Hope you got my point. NameAnon (talk) 21:09, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for admitted block evasion. You also state that you will continue to edit war to blank sourced content, which would need to be addressed prior to an unblock being considered regardless of the multiple accounts. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:19, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
 * If you will be pursuing an unblock, please ensure you 1) provide information regarding previously blocked accounts and 2) agree to only edit the talk page to discuss concerns you have with the article.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:26, 31 August 2020 (UTC)