User talk:Nameless.xx

March 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Oceania, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. ''Please read WP:RS on what sources you must use to make *any* change in Wikipedia. You cannot use Wikipedia itself as a source.'' Tarl N. ( discuss ) 03:56, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Oceania. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Robynthehode (talk) 16:04, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Robynthehode. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Melanesians, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Robynthehode (talk) 22:21, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. JarrahTree 06:59, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Maluku Islands
You have added information about the Maluku Islands to various articles - Oceania, Melanesia, Australo-Melanesian, Pacific Islander, and Moluccans - all of which have been reverted by various editors because you have not provided a reliable source for this information. You have been requested to provide a reliable source by editors but have failed to do so. Please read WP:RS for why Wikipedia is based on reliable sources and not its editors opinions. While you may believe your edits are correct they must be supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia itself is not a reliable source and therefore cannot be used as a source for itself. You have reverted editors reversions of your unsupported edits. This is edit warring WP:WAR. Please read about edit warring as ignoring my advice here and the warnings above will mean that you will be be blocked from editing. You have also added incorrect information in your edit summaries - calling your edits - fixing grammar - when it is clearly not. Along with the edit warring this shows to other editors and admins that you are engaged in disruptive editing WP:DE. Edits must be made according to a neutral point of view WP:NPOV and are not about truth WP:TRUTH but what can be supported by reliable sources. Please engage with the Wikipedia editing process. If you require any other help please ask, other editors are more than happy to advise. Robynthehode (talk) 10:17, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Robynthehode (talk) 17:33, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. qedk (t 心 c) 18:50, 8 March 2020 (UTC)