User talk:NamelessConsular

I have posted a message at User talk:Doctorfacts, asking him/her to respect consensus, and once more requesting discussion rather than edit warring. If this does not work I recommend that you do not revert the next edit by Doctorfacts, as you could be in danger of being seen to be edit warring yourself, but feel welcome to put a note on my talk page, and I will move on from there. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:52, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

As you know, Doctorfacts has now posted a long message about this on my talk page. I have seen your answer to Doctorfacts there, and I understand the concerns you have expressed. However, now that there is at last some indication that Doctorfacts is willing to take part in discussion, I think the most constructive thing is for you to try discussing the issues with him/her in as friendly a spirit as possible. Even cases which at first have looked quite hopeless have sometimes been cleared up by co-operative discussion. I suggest continuing the discussion on the article's talk page, which is a more appropriate place for it than my talk page. Also please read the note I have posted to that article talk page, and consider it carefully. Even if neither you nor Doctorfacts finishes up with exactly what you would like, you may perhaps manage to reach a version you are both willing to settle for. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:35, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Scarlett (G.I. Joe)
I am just writing to remind you of the invitation to discuss Scarlett (G.I. Joe) on its talk page. The time while the article is protected from editing should be an excellent opportunity to sort out the disagreements. That way, when the protection expires, it should be possible to edit the article constructively, rather than returning to edit warring. JamesBWatson (talk) 07:04, 17 May 2010 (UTC)