User talk:Namescases

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Firsfron of Ronchester 16:49, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Fidel Castro
Yeah, looks like you won't be getting any apology for your dubious source —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fpliii (talk • contribs) 04:37, August 25, 2007 (UTC)

Dubious tag on Robert E. Murray article
I've started a discussion about the "dubious" tag you added to the page on Robert E. Murray. You might wish to read the talk page. — Scartol  •  Talk  22:15, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Civility
Your repeated demands for an apology and threats of reporting users to ArbCom and RfC are disruptive and could be viewed as abusive. Please review the policy on civility and refrain from making disruptive comments. Thank you. --Ginkgo100talk 23:34, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I do not agree that asking for an apology in one eventuality is disruptive or abusive, and an RfC is an appropriate next step. If anything, your demands that I refrain while threatening me with an abuse complaint are worse. But rather than make destructive threats, I will take the high ground and let this message stand. --Namescases 00:02, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I didn't threaten you with anything. I just asked you politely to be polite yourself. --Ginkgo100talk 02:46, 25 August 2007 (UTC)


 * An Rfc would be entirely inappropriate and it wouldnt be just Ginkgo100 who would see that as disruptive. When editors just follow policy in an uncontroversial way then threats of Rfc or arbcom could indeed be considered disruptive, SqueakBox 03:11, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Welcome!
Here is a list of useful links that I have compiled:
 * Biographies of living persons
 * What Wikipedia is not
 * Neutral point of view
 * Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point
 * Attribution
 * Verifiability
 * Assume good faith
 * Civility
 * Words to avoid
 * Requests for oversight
 * Requests_for_page_protection
 * Requests_for_comment
 * Wikipedia:Block log
 * Requests for mediation
 * Administrators' noticeboard
 * Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
 * Administrators' noticeboard/3RR
 * Requests for arbitration
 * Articles for deletion
 * Images and media for deletion
 * Requests for checkuser
 * Usernames for administrator attention
 * Avoid the word "vandal"
 * No legal threats
 * Mediation Cabal, SqueakBox 00:35, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Apology
Looks like it should be ont he other foot, ie you owe us an apology, cos his death has absolutely not been announced still, SqueakBox 21:18, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Trolling
This edit is trolling. Please do not do this again. Guy (Help!) 16:35, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
 * First of all, it is not trolling. That is a list of encyclopedias, and no matter how hard the Wikipedia cabal stops their feet, it warrants inclusion in that list. I know you try really, really, really hard to get rid of ED from the Internet, but it has a place on that article. If you truly don't want it listed on a list of encyclopedias, then you may have to delete the article.
 * Second, your tone is most unwelcome. Between this and your unwarranted reversion of my edits to Web of trust (removing links to very unstable/down websites does not violate the original research rule on any sane planet), I daresay that you suddenly have a vendetta against me. It is alarming and disconcerting, so I ask that you kindly refrain from posting to my talk page unless you wish to apologize. --Namescases (talk) 22:48, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

But Coren, I am asking for the community to review this matter. And to state my case. Surely I have a right to present my side, to discuss this in an open forum, and so forth? Alternatively, if you believe you are so correct, why are you afraid of unblocking me so that I can get an RfC on the matter? --Namescases (talk) 01:20, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * You have, actually, no such "right". Editing Wikipedia is an opportunity you can deny yourself with inappropriate behavior such as you have displayed.  The Arbitration Committee has already ruled that links to ED are entirely inapropriate, so your only avenue of redress is with them.  &mdash; Coren (talk) 01:35, 3 January 2008 (UTC)


 * You've come here to troll, and have admitted as much with edits like this. You could at least be honest about it when confronted.  We realize that you are trying to have fun by being disruptive, but you have to realize that we are trying to build an encyclopedia here, not play a MMORPG.  Please stop wasting our time.  Thank you, Antandrus  (talk) 03:09, 3 January 2008 (UTC)