User talk:Namllits2008

Please stop
Namlitts####, please stop making new accounts to insert the same information over and over. Please discuss your edits on the talkpage. Thanks. --Dirk Beetstra T C 15:16, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

There is absolutely no reason to block this entry - all the facts are there - FDA clearance documents, FDA guidelines on 510(k) regarding safety and efficacy and reference to the clinical reprint.

If you continue to be negative for no reason i will continue to post. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Namllits2008 (talk • contribs)


 * But there is reason to discuss. It has been removed over and over and over, by several editors, the text is clearly promotional, and creating sockpuppets is not helping your cause.  Please go to the talkpage, and discuss, and I would suggest that you let other, uninvolved editors include it, not you.  Thanks.  --Dirk Beetstra T  C 13:49, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

This is a complete joke and an outrage - is this not promotional that is on that site?

"Finasteride, initially marketed as the brand-name drugs Propecia and Proscar by Merck, belongs to a class of drugs called aza-steroids. Finasteride is a "DHT inhibitor" and was originally approved by the US FDA for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The drug works by binding to 5-alpha-reductase, the enzyme responsible for the conversion of free testosterone to DHT.

Merck sought to find the smallest effective quantity of finasteride and test its long-term effects on 1,553 men between ages 18 and 41 with mildly to moderately thinning hair. Based on their research, 1 mg daily was selected, and after two years of daily treatment, over 83% of the 1,553 men experiencing male hair loss had actually maintained or increased their hair count from baseline. Visual assessments concluded that over 80% had improved appearances.[5]

In 1997, finasteride was approved by the US FDA for the treatment of male pattern baldness. A 5-year study revealed that 9 of 10 men taking finasteride (1 mg daily) experienced visible results (42% of men taking Propecia experienced no further hair loss while 48% experienced no further hair loss and hair regrowth).[6] In clinical studies, finasteride, like minoxidil, was shown to work on both the crown area and the hairline area, but is most successful in the crown area.[7]"

You are really a disgrace in your unfounded biases. — Preceding unsigned comment added by namllits2008 (talk • contribs)
 * Also for those changes, you could have gone to the talkpage to discuss that, or even to neutralise that. Instead you push insertion of a piece of text, creating sockpuppets.  I suggest you go back to your original account, request an unblock (which may be granted if you ask it and promise not to start new accounts, and go discuss on the talkpage.  And there is nothing biased about that, the only thing I brought to a halt is your edit warring and pushing, and trying to enforce discussion.  Maybe the information will be included in the end, but this is not the way that that is going to happen.  --Dirk Beetstra T  C 09:24, 26 May 2010 (UTC)


 * I am going to add to this, although your arguments are a bit weak; Merck, is found to be a notable company, whereas HairMax LaserComb was not found to be notable (and got deleted on concerns of non-notability and (paid editing) spam). Please stop promoting, and start discussing on how to proceed (yes, I did notice that this are your first attempts at discussion, except for the remark at the deletion debate).  --Dirk Beetstra T  C 09:32, 26 May 2010 (UTC)