User talk:Namomecate

Hello
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for taking the time to write the Shisa Robert‎ article. However, it does not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles, and has, as a result, been marked for deletion. Please do not be disheartened by what may happen to it. Just continue to edit Wikipedia and add articles which are suitable for an encyclopedia.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me. To do this, click on my username, click discussion at the top, and then the (+) button. Also see Wikipedia's help page. -- MightyWarrior (talk) 11:32, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Shisa Robert
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Shisa Robert, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Shisa Robert seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Shisa Robert, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 11:31, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I understand that you are unhappy with the previous deletion. It is not meant to be an offense against of Robert Shisa who seems to be respected individual doing good work. It just did not make clear why this encyclopedia should (already) have an article on him. In any case I would not mind to be corrected otherwise. Nevertheless, please refrain from adding fake biographies as you did afterwards.--Tikiwont (talk) 12:23, 22 April 2008 (UTC)