User talk:Namtug

Category:Canadian Legal History
Name should be non-capped: Category:Canadian legal history or more to the usual style Category:Legal history of Canada. Somewhere out there are guidelines about this.Skookum1 (talk) 06:08, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Justiceforchildren.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Justiceforchildren.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:56, 13 July 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 16:56, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

--> I'll fix this Namtug (talk) 17:10, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Liza Maza for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Liza Maza is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Liza Maza until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CombatWombat42 (talk) 22:15, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tanya De Mello, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Civil Law and United Way. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Tanya De Mello for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tanya De Mello is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tanya De Mello until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nominated by at 16:37, 29 August 2015 (UTC). davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)  20:05, 29 August 2015 (UTC) fixed up and re-signed. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)  18:04, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

I think this is a newsworthy and suitable individual to put on Wikipedia. I will add secondary sources to bolster the article. Thanks. Namtug (talk) 15:00, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Tanya De Mello.jpeg
Thank you for uploading File:Tanya De Mello.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)  03:11, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
 * To clarify: It is longstanding practice on the English Wikipedia that if a person is still available to be photographed, only "free" images - that is, images that qualify to be uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons, are allowed.  People who are deceased, those who are hardly ever available for someone to take a "free" photo of, or people whose appearance has changed radically since they were public figures (e.g. now-grown child actors who are no longer in the public eye) are the major exceptions.  Politicians are almost always "publicly available" enough that it is likely that a "free" image exists or that one could be made relatively easily. davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  03:20, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Tanya De Mello.jpeg
 Thanks for uploading File:Tanya De Mello.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:57, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

New 10,000 Challenge for Canada
Hi, WikiProject Canada/The 10,000 Challenge is up and running based on The 10,000 Challenge for the UK which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. If you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Canada like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1600 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for Canada but fuelled by a contest such as The North America Destubathon to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. I would like some support from Canadian wikipedians here to get the Challenge off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile! Cheers. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of LegalEase


A tag has been placed on LegalEase requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. –Ammarpad (talk) 20:59, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kiliba, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page French ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Kiliba check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Kiliba?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 18 July 2018 (UTC)