User talk:Namun01

March 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Diabetes, sexuality and pregnancy has been reverted. Your edit here to Diabetes, sexuality and pregnancy was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.diabetes-article.com, http://www.diabetes-article.com, http://www.diabetes-article.com, http://www.diabetes-article.com) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 07:43, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Diabetes, sexuality and pregnancy
Hello Namun01,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Diabetes, sexuality and pregnancy for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 07:50, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Diabetes, sexuality and pregnancy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Diabetes, sexuality and pregnancy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Diabetes, sexuality and pregnancy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 10:48, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for editing Wikipedia only in order to use it for promotion, and responding to protection of the spam article which you had repeatedly created by using another account to re-create it under a different title, evidently in the hope of evading scrutiny. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:50, 16 March 2016 (UTC)