User talk:Nanako4

Nomination of Shiawase kisa sanchōme for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shiawase kisa sanchōme is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Shiawase kisa sanchōme until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Crazymonkey1123 (Jacob) (Shout!) 02:29, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Shiawase kisa sanchome


A tag has been placed on Shiawase kisa sanchome requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. andy (talk) 09:10, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Shiawase kisa sanchome


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Shiawase kisa sanchome. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Shiawase kisa sanchōme. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Shiawase kisa sanchōme - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. andy (talk) 13:43, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Happy Cafe
Hi - the article you wrote for Wikipedia is now under the title Happy Cafe, that Tokyopop publishes it under. In order for articles about fiction to be safe on Wikipedia, they need real-world information, preferably 'reception' - reviews of the series. There's been a little bit of this added to the article, so it's likely to be kept. Are you interested in manga in general? If so, you might want to check out the anime and manga wikiproject. They keep some lists of reviewers that are considered reliable, so that this doesn't happen again! --Malkinann (talk) 19:35, 13 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for adding the information about the drama CD - I was able to find the seller's website and put that as a source for the article, and I found there had been another drama CD published as well! --Malkinann (talk) 02:17, 14 April 2011 (UTC)