User talk:Nancy salto/sandbox

Nancy's Peer Review
Hello, Nancy!

1. You do a great job being neutral with your facts. No signs of extreme bias, which is good! It's also good that you have content embedded in your article. I notice that it seems unfinished, but that's completely fine. I can see what you're going for with this article via your Contents sections, which is nice, by the way.

2. Some changes for improvement might be just a few grammatical errors, which are a super easy fix. Also, I noticed that you didn't have any citations within your article. Maybe you can go back and cite within your writing.

3. I think that the most important thing to improve on would be labelling where you cite your findings. That way when someone reads your article, they know which statements came from which source.

4. Something that I learned from your article that I will go back and add to my own is your suggestions on content that you focus on for your artist's article. I thought you had a nice lists of things to consider on your Wikipedia page for your artist, whereas I didn't have as much content suggestions for mine.

Overall, I think you are on the right track! The facts are there, the sources are there, you'll just need to connect them. Also, there are just some grammatical errors which are an easy fix. And you are adding more to your article which shows that you have more facts to add! Just make sure each section is relatively the same amount of information, and you're good!! :) Caitlin Cunningham 22:51, 15 February 2019 (UTC) Caitlin Cunningham 22:51, 15 February 2019 (UTC)Caitlin Cunningham (caitcunni97)