User talk:Nancycollisson@yahoo.com

License tagging for Image:Nancy Buffy Reading.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Nancy Buffy Reading.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 16:09, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

WP:AUTO
Hi,

Taking your userpage at face-value, I assume that you are Ms. Collisson and that you have contributed an article about yourself. Thank you. This is, however, generally a disfavored practice (see WP:AUTO.) Understandably, there is always reason to suspect an autobiographical article may not meet encyclopedic standards for impartiality. Although its autobiographical quality makes your article flawed, it does not mean that the article will be deleted. In order for the article to be kept, though, it would be helpful if you could provide citations (to news stories or other reliable sources) attesting to your notability within the UAE. Best wishes, Xoloz 16:59, 2 July 2006 (UTC)


 * I have correctly tagged your uploaded image for you, consistent with your intention to release the image under Creative Commons 1.0. Assuming, again, that you are Ms. Collisson, may I add that both you and your cat are quite beautiful! :)  Best wishes, Xoloz 17:09, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

File:MR BUFFY 1 BACKCOVER.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:MR BUFFY 1 BACKCOVER.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Skier Dude ( talk ) 16:36, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mr. Buffy


A tag has been placed on Mr. Buffy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Churchgoer251 (talk) 23:35, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Mr. Buffy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mr. Buffy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mr. Buffy (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Churchgoer251 (talk) 23:43, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Possible conflict of interest
Hello Nancycollisson@yahoo.com. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Nancy Collisson, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.