User talk:Nancyedoherty2662

September 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Joe McGinniss with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —  Jeff G. ツ (talk)   00:59, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. I notice that you removed topically-relevant content from Joe McGinniss. However, Wikipedia is not censored to remove content that might be considered objectionable. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. While you were right, in my opinion, about removing the Big Journalism review as non notable, the LA Times and the New York Times are reliable sources, and their reviews matter. You'll need equally reliable sources to remove those references. Also keep in mind Wikipedia's policy about neutral point of view. 107.10.43.91 (talk) 04:08, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Edit warring on Joe McGinniss
Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively. Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. aprock (talk) 18:18, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.