User talk:Nanderson626/Rent party

Peer Review
First, what does the article do well? Formatted really nicely and appropriately! I like how you added hyperlinks for other Wikipedia pages within your article as well. The lead gives a nice introduction to what the rent party is and where it originated.

Is there anything from your review that impressed you? The overall amount of information and content in the article is impressive! It looks like you put a lot of effort into it. I like how the article went into depth about ways to get into rent parties, and how they were a temporary solution to a larger problem.

Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way? Particularly when it was stated that these parties were held in secret due to the threat that the police presented on this group of individuals.

What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Within the historical background section, it says African Americans headed "North", without providing context on where "North" is. Maybe add a little information supporting that. As well as the last paragraph is sectioned "organization", I think since you are talking about how individuals get certain cards to then be able to access these parties you could label it "access", as organization is more general.

Why would those changes be an improvement? I think these changes would be an improvement for readers as it would make the article a little more straight forward.

What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? Most importantly make sure you are connecting what you wrote within the introduction to the sections additionally in the article. You have already done a great job doing that but just remembering to continue.

Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Let them know! Yes! The layout looks organized as well as the way you went about explaining the history was very insightful.Ellegross (talk) 22:19, 5 February 2020 (UTC)Elle

Pre-move Review
Hello, I looked over your change history and noticed that you haven't done much to improve the article. Here are a few suggestions before making your version live:


 * Find other articles about a related subject, see which sections that may be applicable to yours, add those sections and fill them with content.
 * Find citations to add as references, for instance, how do you know 'they were predominantly advertised through "rent party tickes"'?
 * Check if there are any relevant infoboxes, category templates, and images.
 * Add a "See also" section of related articles.
 * Review the WikiEdu Editing Guide!

Please ping me again on Wikipedia once you're ready and I'll check back. Thanks! Salt ♨️🚲🧂🧙‍♂️🐧🎓⚔️☠️ (talk) 05:56, 12 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello, I took another look over your changes and can see that you've improved the article quite a bit. Go ahead and start moving things over according to the detailed instructions on our class wiki. Thanks for becoming a Wikipedia editor!  一 Salt ♨️🚲🧂🧙‍♂️🐧🎓⚔️☠️ (talk) 17:04, 19 February 2020 (UTC)


 * I agree! This looks great. Thanks for all your hard work on this. — m a k o ๛  20:11, 19 February 2020 (UTC)