User talk:Naninguyen

Recent Edits
Hi Naninguyen, Please do not remove information without providing an adequate edit summary as you did here. Additionally, the Famous players section was removed because without clear inclusion crtieria it is simply OR. Please don't add this back again without stating clearly why these players are specifically notable to the club. Thanks. Fenix down (talk) 10:47, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Please just stop adding back unreffed material and removing whole sections. your actions are becoming disruptive. Fenix down (talk) 11:11, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Can you please explain why you continue to ignore attempts to communicate with you and also continue to remove sourced information from articles as you have also started to do here. Fenix down (talk) 15:13, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

My User Page
Please do not ever vandalise my user page again. Fenix down (talk) 10:49, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Notable/famous players
These sections that you add to articles are unreferenced and violate WP:NPOV - what makes them "notable" in regard to the club? Please include reliable sources and some kind of inclusion criteria. Please also do not vandalise other editor's user pages. GiantSnowman 12:02, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=Stop icon]] This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Huda Hue F.C., you may be blocked from editing without further notice. GiantSnowman 08:34, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Daniel Case (talk) 01:31, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Notable Players (Again!)
Please re read the warnings above, the list you added here did not contain any form of inclusion criteria that could be deemed to be clear. Fenix down (talk) 12:05, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=591850039 your edit] to Thanh Hoa F.C. may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:24, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Fs player|no=24|nat=VIE|pos=DF|name=Lê Bật Hiếu

December 2014
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Lê Phước Tứ, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 22:37, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

January 2015
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Geoffrey Kizito, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GiantSnowman 10:41, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Ambox warning pn.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Moses Oloya. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. GiantSnowman 09:12, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=Stop icon]] You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Moses Oloya. GiantSnowman 14:41, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for adding unreferenced information about living people, and removing referenced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. GiantSnowman 14:47, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Hoàng Anh Gia Lai F.C., without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 19:01, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Thanh Hoa F.C., without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Dl2000 (talk) 00:06, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

February 2015
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Đồng Nai F.C.. Dl2000 (talk) 04:28, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)