User talk:Nankurunaisanankuru

September 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of highest-grossing films in the Philippines has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:44, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of highest-grossing films in the Philippines was changed by Nankurunaisanankuru (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.901849 on 2015-09-11T04:44:39+00:00.
 * Information orange.svg Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Kathryn Bernardo. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. -WayKurat (talk) 04:57, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Nuvola apps important.svg Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Kathryn Bernardo, you may be blocked from editing. -WayKurat (talk) 05:02, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=Stop icon]] You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Kathryn Bernardo. -WayKurat (talk) 05:07, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Kathryn Bernardo shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Thomas.W talk 06:37, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Thomas.W talk 07:37, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

September 2015
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Kathryn Bernardo. Thomas.W talk 07:40, 11 September 2015 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Materialscientist (talk) 07:59, 11 September 2015 (UTC)