User talk:Nanny's Boy

Joseph Iannuzzi
Hi, I hate to bother you, but do you have any references to prove this person is notable? Bearian (talk) 23:07, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Attacks in
Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our Biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 21:19, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Roger Lanier
A tag has been placed on Roger Lanier requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Adolphus79 (talk) 04:46, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Arthur C. Bratsos
Please don't post unsourced articles that assert that their subjects were criminals. See WP:BLP. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:12, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Thomas J. DePrisco
A tag has been placed on Thomas J. DePrisco requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Adolphus79 (talk) 19:43, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Robert Donati
A tag has been placed on Robert Donati requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Adolphus79 (talk) 19:47, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Please stop creating articles about non-notable criminals... - Adolphus79 (talk) 19:47, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Albert D. Gonsalves
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Albert D. Gonsalves, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Albert D. Gonsalves seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Albert D. Gonsalves, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 20:20, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Notability
You seem to be writing a large number of articles about mobsters/gangsters/hoodlums, who the general community consensus suggests are not very notable. We hate to see an editor working hard and seeing his/her work vanish; is there any way that you could either write about more notable topics, or highlight the significance of the ones you are presently writing about? Please note that, generally speaking being a criminal, being jailed and/or being shot does not of itself confer notability. --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 20:41, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

November 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Anthony Rampino has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. \ / (⁂) 06:45, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for Image:Frank DeCicco.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Frank DeCicco.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 23:27, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Augustus Mancuso
A tag has been placed on Augustus Mancuso requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. roux   12:50, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Attacks in
Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our Biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. - Fails WP:BLP and thus is an attack page Mjroots (talk) 18:07, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Augustus Mancuso
I have nominated Augustus Mancuso, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Augustus Mancuso. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. roux   18:14, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Editing on biographical articles
Hi,

I notice you're doing a lot of work on biographical articles. I hope this note will help you with an issue that can affect these kinds of pages.


 * On most articles, it's enough to cite a reference -- a book and page, or a book, page and quoted text. On biographical articles it's done to a much higher standard: citations for most facts are probably a good idea, it would be normal to cite specifically, all facts that may seem "negative", and those cites should come from a reliable and high quality source.


 * On most articles, if references are missing or skipped, it's enough to say (for a while) "references needed". On a biography, the text may be deleted without notice if there's a concern, until the citing issue is fixed.


 * On biographical articles, a text that is negative in tone, must be sourced and neutral to the highest quality we can. That doesn't mean "don't call a spade a spade". It does mean, we have to be able to show that this is the view of one or more reputable authoritative sources or information, that the different significant viewpoints are given due weight (if applicable), presented in a balanced NPOV manner, and let the encyclopedic facts speak for themselves.


 * Biographical articles or text deleted due to failing to meet the requirements of BLP articles, must not be recreated until the concerns are fixed, or a consensus is reached at deletion review that it's okay to do so.

The article you created and edited, on Michael Paradiso, is an example of this. It's written to an encyclopedic style; it's got references; but the overall impression is negative (as may well be reasonable) and a reader cannot easily tell if the individual negative statements are verifiable or whether the overall biography is likely to be neutral fair and balanced.

Accordingly I've deleted it, but that's because it is necessary. I'll email you the text if you would like to rectify this, and as soon as you can add careful high quality citing to it, to show it meets the biographies of living persons policy requirements, you can re-add it (updated) to the wiki :)

Best, and apologies, hope this makes sense!

FT2 (Talk 22:18, 20 December 2008 (UTC)


 * I agree with the above. Your article is probably factually correct and fair, and you probably got all the information from the sources you put at the bottom. However, with negative material on living people we need to have a precise reference for each negative claim, otherwise there's nothing to stop someone unscrupulous inserting libels. I realise this may be frustrating, but we've had problems with people doing that. I suggest you read the policy on living people carefully, and then ask an administrator to e-mail you the text of the deleted article. You are then free to recreate it with referenced which comply with the policy. If you do that then hopefully your material will not be deleted again. Sorry this has happened, and thanks for your contributions.--Scott Mac (Doc) 22:26, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Capitalization of headings
The Wikipedia style for capitalizing headings is to use "sentence case" instead of "title case", e.g.,


 * Important things to know about this subject

not:
 * Important Things to Know About This Subject

This may be unfamiliar to many editors who believe that or have been taught that "title case is the right way to capitalize headings". It isn't the "right way", it is one style. Wikipedia has, for better or worse, chosen to follow a different style, i.e., capitalize the heading the same way you would capitalize any sentence:
 * capitalize the first word,
 * capitalize any proper nouns (people, places, organizations), and
 * begin all other words with lower case letters.

See WP:MSH for more information. Thanks. Ground Zero | t 12:35, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Formatting
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please familiarize the Manual of Style in order to improve your contributions. Here are a couple of tips for you: Thanks. Ground Zero | t 17:37, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Do not link dates. Date linking is now discouraged (see MOS:SYL) because these links are of little value to anyone and just add unnecessary clutter.
 * 2) Do not link plain English words, and do not link the same thing repeatedly -- once is usually enough. Please see WP:OVERLINK.
 * 3) Spell out acronyms on first use (see MOS), like "FBI", to make it easier for readers who may not be familiar with U.S. topics to understand the articles.

A few more things: Thanks again for your contributions and your cooperation. Ground Zero | t 17:43, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) i before e except after c: "receive", not "recieve"
 * 2) "Align" has one l, not two.
 * 3) Write "February 1971", not "February of 1971". This is the Wikipedia style. See WP:MOSNUM.
 * 4) Please break text up into paragraphs to make it easier for readers to follow the article. Long blocks of text are more difficult to read.

And more: Ground Zero | t 22:28, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
 * "moniker" does not ahave a "c" in it
 * Write "1960s", not "1960's". This is the Wikipedia style. See WP:MOSNUM.
 * "circa" is abbreviated "c.", not "c.a."
 * When you're writing about someone's height, the way to abbreviate is 5'9", where the  '  stands for feet and the  "  stands for inches. Writing 5'9 is incomplete.

Ahem
I see from your work on Richard J. Schneiderhan that you are continuing to: I will ask you again to respect the Manual of Style, which has been developed by the Wikipedia community as the standard for all Wikipedia articles. Please edit articles in the Wikipedia style. Thank you. Ground Zero | t 21:48, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
 * link dates,
 * link the same articles repeatedly, even in a very short article like this one,
 * link plain English words, and
 * misspell "surveillance".

Your errors on Joseph Lundbaum include: Please stop making edits that violate WP:MOS. Ground Zero | t 12:14, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * linking dates,
 * repeated links to the same thing, and
 * writing " 1980's " -- Wikipedia style is " 1980s " -- see WP:MOSNUM.

After looking at recent edits to William S. O'Sullivan, I think you should review what I've written above about capitalization of headings. Ground Zero | t 16:30, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

If you are not willing to heed WP:MOS, as you have now demonstrated once again with Frank Amato, why should you be allowed to edit? Please go and clean up your own work. Thank you. Ground Zero | t 12:07, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

! And you are continuing to do so with Joseph Scorney. Next time you edit without regard to WP:MOS, I will be back to block you. Ground Zero | t 00:23, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

New articles
I see from Robert Senter and Tony Rampino that you're still determine to write whatever you feel lie in any crappy style you want and Wikipedia be damned. It is a pity that you won't make a little bit of an effort to make your articles better. I will edit your articles ruthlessly in order to maintain Wikipedia standards. Ground Zero | t 13:39, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Patrick Linskey
Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Cactus Writer |   needles  19:44, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Andrew Gigante
Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Cactus Writer |   needles  20:23, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Charles Carneglia
Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Cactus Writer |   needles  20:53, 29 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry, but I've deleted this as meeting WP:CSD. You may want to carefully review Your first article.
 * For more general information about the deletion process, please see User:Dlohcierekim/deletion
 * If you believe the subject does in fact meet notability guidelines with reliable sources providing verifiable information, please contact me on my talk page.
 * If you wish to make test edits or work on the article before creating it, you can create a test page at User:/test.
 * Cheers, and happy editing.  Dloh  cierekim  21:11, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Charles Carneglia
I have nominated Charles Carneglia, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Charles Carneglia. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Dloh cierekim  21:18, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Carmine Avellino
A tag has been placed on Carmine Avellino, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

violation of BLP policy. Article potentially libelous and information unverifiable due to lack of sources

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. HJ Mitchell (talk) 11:39, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

A warning -- you will be blocked
A quick review of your contributions for May shows that you are back at it again, adding unsourced material to biographies, including those for living persons, in some cases, or adding lots of material without providing in-line references, and ignoring the Manual of Style. It is not a good use of your time as your edits have been reverted. It is not a good use of other editors' time cleaning up after you. next time, I will block you per WP:BLP, which says:
 * Editors who repeatedly add or restore contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced may be blocked for disruption. The blocking policy has full information.
 * Editors who repeatedly add or restore contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced may be blocked for disruption. The blocking policy has full information.

Ground Zero | t 03:55, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Nanny&#39;s Boy! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created  is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 11:45, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Alan Fidler -

Nomination of James M. Murphy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James M. Murphy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/James M. Murphy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vrac (talk) 01:53, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of George Joynt for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article George Joynt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/George Joynt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:31, 22 June 2020 (UTC)