User talk:Nanonic/Archive 1

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  howcheng  {chat} 06:43, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Swindon town fc badges 1969-1971.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Swindon town fc badges 1969-1971.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:27, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Swindon town fc badges 1989-1990.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Swindon town fc badges 1989-1990.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:27, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Username concern
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope not to seem unfriendly or make you feel unwelcome, but I noticed your username, and I am concerned that it might not meet Wikipedia's username policy. After you look over that policy, could we discuss that concern here?

I'd appreciate learning your own views, for instance your reasons for wanting this particular name, and what alternative username you might accept that avoids raising this concern.

You have several options freely available to you:
 * If you can relieve my concern through discussing it here, I can stop worrying about it.
 * If the two of us can't agree here, we can ask for help through Wikipedia's dispute resolution process, such as requesting comments from other Wikipedians. Wikipedia administrators usually abide by agreements reached through this process.
 * You can keep your contributions history under a new username. Visit Changing username and follow the guidelines there.

Let me reassure you that my writing here means I don't think your username is grossly, blatantly, or obviously inappropriate; such names get reported straight to Usernames for administrator attention or blocked on sight. This is more a case where opinions might differ, and it would be good to reach some consensus — either here or at Requests for comment/User names. So I look forward to a friendly discussion, and to enjoying your continued participation on Wikipedia. -- Kerotan Leave Me a Message  Have  a nice day :) 07:36, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

User name change
Do you mind changing your username to something different?. it hasn't caused any problems so far, but there might be some CoI problems in the future, so i think its in your best interests to get it changed.see Changing username.-- Kerotan Leave Me a Message  Have  a nice day :) 04:54, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the suggestion, I have filed a username change request at Changing username Smirnoff Black 13:48, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Football DYKs
Good work on adding those missing Football Did You Knows. I spent waaaaay too much time doing that page yesterday so it's good to hand the baton on to someone else! Looks like it's nearly complete now? --Jameboy 21:31, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Football (soccer) officials userbox
Hi. The userbox at your test page looks fine. Bear in mind though that the only notable Occupation as far as WikiProject Football is concerned is Referee (assistant refereeship is a progression, and a by-product, of the person's notable activities as a referee. Fourth official activities are of a similar nature). Also, not all current referees, and certainly not past referees, are or were professional, and therefore had (or indeed currently have) another paid occupation. You would need to clarify which context of the word "Occupation" you are referring to - I would suggest "Other occupation" as a better description.

Football match officials operate at levels. However, at each level there is a split level. From, say, Conference referee you would gain promotion to the Football League as an assistant referee, spend many years doing just that, with maybe a promotion to Premier League assistant if lucky. Premier League assistant referees can then be appointed by UEFA to be assistants in European competition or friendlies, and by FIFA as assistants in other International matches.

For outstanding officials, the progression would then be from Football League assistant ref to FL referee, and from Premiership assistant to full FAPL referee. Once an assistant makes the step up, they cease to operate in the UEFA or FIFA lists as assistants, and must await their chance of selection as a referee on those International lists.

A current interesting article (to me) is Philip Sharp (referee). As you will see, he has been a FIFA official for over ten years now, yet has not refereed a single Football League or Premier League match in his life. How is this possible? How can he be notable if he has never refereed at the very top level?

As what you might call a "specialist assistant", he has experienced situations and events that most fully-operational referees would give their right arms for - a European Championships finals, two World Cup finals competitions including the 2002 World Cup Final itself, and an Olympic Games Football Tournament (not to mention myriad International Club Competition appointments). Being now 43 years old, it is unlikely that he will ever make the grade as a fully-fledged referee at the very top. Yet he has undoubted supreme notability qualification through his International work alone.

I for one would definitely use the infobox if it were accepted as a template. Let me know how you progress with this.

I hope this has given you some insight, and if you need more specific info, please get in touch. Best wishes. Ref (chew) (do) 22:03, 30 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Looks good to me. I can't guarantee when I will start adding it to existing articles, but when I next contribute a new article, or carry out a major expansion/overhaul of an existing article, I will add the userbox. Well done. Ref (chew) (do) 19:26, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!
Just wanted to say thanks for setting up User:AlexNewArtBot/AssociationFootball and for correcting my shonky coding on some of my additions! It's a really useful tool, I'll definitely be using it a lot from now on for new page tracking. Qwghlm (talk) 16:43, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Association football
A little bit of overkill? ;) Thanks for adding them in! More sources are always welcome! Woody (talk) 17:27, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the help with the Fair Use templates! --Elonka 18:35, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for saving an image from deletion
Thank you for your help in ]. -- Char leen mer ced  Talk  19:46, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:AsiaLogoTop.jpg
Good work. If you like doing that stuff, then please keep an eye on my talkpage - I get loads of notifications about images I uploaded years ago when a simple fair use tag was considered enough!  SilkTork  *What's YOUR point? 13:51, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Soccer team logo12.jpg
Thanks. I appreciate that. -  Milk's   Favorite   Cookie  14:34, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Template changes to WP:FOOTY assessment
Hi Nanonic, just noticed your changes to the assessment template;thanks for these! Not sure that FL is picked up by the WP1.0 assessment bot though - do you know if it does? It doesn't appear at all in Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Statistics so I wonder if articles rated in this way are actually being excluded from the process? (I don't know the answer) Paulbrock (talk) 20:30, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi Paul, I'm not 100% sure either although there is currently a campaign ongoing to get them included (as FA's are only supposed to cover articles). However, what I do know is that since the introduction of both FL and List classes; people have begun to use them more and more which means articles get removed from the WP1.0 statistics for the project (see recent bot log for WP:WPF). What I will do is to wait until the next bot run, and if all FL's are dropped off or ignored then I'll edit the template to dupe cat them - so that a FL is added to cat:FL and cat:FA for counting whilst leaving the infrastructure there for when they're picked up properly. Thanks for the warning! Nanonic (talk) 21:15, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Change requested to lump FA's and FL's together for the time being. Nanonic (talk) 22:35, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Sheffield Wednesday new article bot
Sorry to bother you again, but it seems that the bot ran at around 18:15, but has not produced a log for WPSWFC. Is there another problem with the code that I have entered, or is there a deadline for new entries? (I added SheffieldWednesday to the master list at about 14:00) Cheers, Dan1980 (talk | stalk) 19:04, 28 February 2008 (UTC)


 * It's no probs, the thing annoyed me like this when I started using it too. It's hard to figure out exactly when the bot began it's run today - it did one archive run at 09:00-10:00 and then again at 1354-1546 before posting results from 15:47-18:20 and then one last stray at 19:14. From looking at this I would imagine the bot was compiled (got it's ruleset and began it's work) just before you added your rules to the master (possibly was compiled around 13:30.. maybe). Don't worry though as it'll post results tomorrow no doubt and in some cases (rarely) it posts results from the previous day too. Since your set is the last in the list, you should expect your results to be posted around 18:20 each day (at the end of the current run) so keep your fingers crossed! I'll have a look at the log when it's posted to see if I can find anything to tweak. Nanonic (talk) 20:20, 28 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks again. Dan1980 (talk | stalk) 20:28, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Signpost
Do you mind if I do this for this week's signpost wikiproject report? Rtac . 16:35, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I've just updated it so that the figures are current for today and asked for a couple of people to give it the once over to make sure it's correct from the project's viewpoint. I wouldn't have any problems with this being included :D Nanonic (talk) 17:20, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Rtac . 17:25, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Signpost comments
Hey Nanonic, thanks for your note. A couple of little grammar/MOS things but otherwise, go for it.. But otherwise, a good advert for the project. Nice work. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:22, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * As per MOS, keep numbers below 10 as text.
 * "one of it's children" should be "one of its children".
 * Comment: "The Project is one of the largest of its type on Wikipedia, albeit one of the largest anyway." What is that meant to say? Otherwise looks like a great overview. Woody (talk) 17:47, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I'll remove it now. I've just re-read it and I agree. :) Rtac . 17:53, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Panama team soccer logos
Alright tell me how to add that FUR you were telling me about, I really like doing that to the soccer pages I create so if there is a way to keep them just ell me how and I'll do it. And sorry for undoing the edits, its just taht it takes a lot to keep these pages nice and Ive had more than one time vandalism occuring. --Burilu (talk) 03:36, 9 March 2008 (UTC)thanks.
 * Thanks a lot for the help, yeah I wasn't really aware of that but now it makes sense. Thanks again.--Burilu (talk) 03:55, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Featured article candidates/England national football team managers
Hi. I replied to the issues you raised. Would you mind revisiting the FAC and adding any further comments, or supporting the nom? --Dweller (talk) 09:46, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Thagyoo! --Dweller (talk) 10:16, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

It might interest you to know
Featured. Yassss! WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN tell me a joke...  20:49, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks! You might want to do the same with Portal:Association football, I think it would pass.  WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN  tell me a joke...  22:18, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the help with the Chatham Cup template :) Grutness...wha?  08:27, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

TUSC token 431adb35dff2a7ff30207617f594c8a4
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nanonic (talk • contribs) 23:23, August 13, 2008‎ (UTC)

Excuse me?
Is there some problem?--MarshalN20 (talk) 13:50, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the tip - think there are enough photos of the Emirates but the ones of the trophy cabinet and kits might come in handy. Qwghlm (talk) 17:31, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Bicycle kick
In response to your comment at talk:Bicycle kick I am informing you that I have opened discussions at WP:FOOTBALL and WP:WIKIQUETTE, feel free to contribute. E P  23:37, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Wusa.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Wusa.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:33, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Iran football assessment
Do you have any opposition to the project having assessment? It will work the same way as any other football country wikiproject, and follows WP:FOOTY's guidelines for sub-project assessment. The request has been knocked back because of your comments, so since I have everything ready I am asking you to post on Template talk:Football page and say whether you have opposition or not. This shouldn't have been knocked back in the first place as I had everything ready so I could start assessment. —Borgardetalk 03:23, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Football portals
Hey Nanonic, I was looking at the code that allows the project banner to show the English football portal when England=yes is shown, and well, it is quite easy to add USA Soccer, and German football as well for when USA=yes or Germany=yes. The only problem is that it would be hierarchically driven, so if England=yes,German=yes, and USA=yes are all on, then English football portal will show. And then it's just up to the order of the otehr two to determine which one is more 'important'. This is just something I've been looking at, I can write up some code and show you if you like. —Borgardetalk 01:28, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

User:Borgarde/FootyTemp/testcases is an example to look at. —Borgardetalk 01:35, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Hi, my riddle
Hi in the riddle i posted on the reference desk thanks so much for identifying it as tipton but can you think of any particular place in tipton? Thank you once again — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hadseys (talk • contribs) 01:29, November 28, 2008

Reference desk regulars
Hello, Nanonic. I noticed a gap and took the liberty of adding your signature to this list. I hope that's alright. (Otherwise revert, of course). ---Sluzzelin talk  18:01, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Consensus Building
As a user who responded to the straw poll regarding non-free images in sports, your further input is requested with regards to the Straw poll summary and proposed guidelines on image use — BQZip01 —  talk 00:39, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Portal:English football/Current season
I cleaned up the code a bit by create a template FootballSeason so that you do not need to add the code for every link .... --Stefan talk 07:34, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Vital Articles
Hey, thanks for tagging a few more pages with Vital! Would you have any interest in joining the project? -Drilnoth (talk) 14:50, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Final version
As a contributor to the discussion regarding sports team logos, I am soliciting feedback as to the latest version of that guideline. Your support/opposition/feedback would be appreciated. — BQZip01 — talk 21:56, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Random portal component edits

 * Random portal component
 * Random portal component with nominate

I actually did not add anything new. Everything that was there was there to begin with. I just did copy edits for grammar, wiki-formatting, etc...

--Jeremy ( Blah blah... ) 03:56, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

I am still working on it. I have to look at the template variables and see what is what. It will be changing, slowly though. --Jeremy ( Blah blah... ) 06:32, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Scally
Cheers for thar - got my refs confused! I'll take a gander at the links you sent me and see what else I can add to the article..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:24, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

P:CLM
Hello. I've discussed your concerns here - would you mind a second look? Thanks, &mdash;  La Pianista  (T•C) 06:13, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

RAF Portal
Good work on the RAF portal. Greenshed (talk) 22:07, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Edward Jackson (photographer)
I noticed you have been active on this one. I did some pruning of the images as I have described on the talk page, just in case you were wondering where they went - the article was way too cluttered. Also, a gentle reminder - please use edit summaries. Thanks! – ukexpat (talk) 22:20, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Re.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ayrton_Prost (talk • contribs) 17:55, April 13, 2009‎ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ayrton_Prost (talk • contribs) 18:05, April 13, 2009‎

Sounders stadium pic
Thanks for adding the pic! I commented more on it here --SkotywaTalk 01:56, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Thnx
Thanks for fixing that page(Matej_Kus)! JMM|Whatup!? 11:16, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
That Liverpool-Arsenal match report really helped cover a couple of extra missing details, thanks for alerting me to its existence! Qwghlm (talk) 11:21, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Swindon Town FC 2007 badge.PNG)
Thanks for uploading File:Swindon Town FC 2007 badge.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:48, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Formal Mediation for Sports Logos
As a contributor to Wikipedia_talk:Non-free_content/RFC_on_use_of_sports_team_logos, you have been included in a request for formal mediation regarding the subject at Requests for mediation/Use of Sports Logos. With your input and agreement to work through mediation, it is hoped we can achieve a lasting solution. --Hammersoft (talk) 13:39, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Request for mediation not accepted
This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management. If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

Malmesbury article
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give a different title by copying its content and pasting it into. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Nanonic (talk) 14:19, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
 * If you had looked through the edit summaries I placed on the page,

or looked at the history of the page Malmesbury, then you would have noted that someone moved the article about the town to create a disambiguation page to link to a series of articles about the town. Much as though I dislike Cut & Paste options, it was the most appropriate in this case. I have hence deleted your tag to move the page back to Malmesbury, Wiltshire. Rgds,--Trident13 (talk) 14:29, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks (article stats)
Thank you for the infos about article traffic stats. Vezér (talk) 20:13, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank You
Thank you so much for all your help on the Mariam Nazarian page. I really appreciate it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anulik96 (talk • contribs) 23:32, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Fleming Way construction 1967.jpg - picture information is incorrect.
Hi

On the page History of Swindon, the image showing the construction of Fleming Way and the main shopping area of the Parade in 1967 has the wrong information. If you click on that image in the page, the description reads: "The new Swindon takes shape - One of the first new developments in the town centre in the 1960's was the construction of Fleming Way and the Parade shopping centre which linked this road with Bridge Street & Regent Street. At the Fleming Way end was the Bon Marche department store [later Debenhams] with a hotel development above [Wiltshire Hotel]."

The development above was an office block, not the Wiltshire Hotel; the hotel is located behind that building and you can see in the photo that the hotel has not been built yet.

Please could you correct the photo description to say it's an office block (now disused), not a hotel.

Cheers. :) TurboForce (talk) 11:43, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

AfD
Emnico Technologies has been nominated for deletion. I'm not the nominator, but they chose not to inform you, and I figured you might like to know. Kevin (talk) 05:01, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

NPA
Please explain what exactly in my comment constitutes a personal attack according to NPA. Otherwise, I'll just have to view your accusations of personal attacks as a meritless attempt at distracting from the valid points in my comment, by someone who incidentally happens to disagree with the content of my comment and the direction of my argument. --78.35.245.253 (talk) 12:38, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Happy now? Seriously though, with just a bit of AGF you can easily see that I am not attacking Uzma Gamal but the logic and attitude in his argument (as explained here). Also, since you are involved in the discussion on the other side of the argument, good Wikiquette would be to leave it to other, less involved editors to judge whether a comment constitutes an attack. Because let's be honest here for a moment: The fact that you don't disagree with the direction of my argument (ie. keep) did play at least a minor role in your misreading of my comment as a personal attack. --78.35.245.253 (talk) 14:03, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Thank you
Just a quick note to thank you for your assistance on the Science desk a few days ago. I have now bought a small Samsung television (after consulting the fully illustrated user manual on their website) and I'm very happy with it.--Shantavira|feed me 11:33, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Sports and games portal selected dyk


A tag has been placed on Category:Sports and games portal selected dyk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for four days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  S ven M anguard  Wha?  23:17, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Sports and games portal selected birthdays


A tag has been placed on Category:Sports and games portal selected birthdays requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for four days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  S ven M anguard  Wha?  03:25, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Emnico-Technologies.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Emnico-Technologies.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:10, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Wikiextlinkshistorypage.PNG missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:Wikiextlinkshistorypage.PNG

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 19:00, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Re: Copa America logo
Oh, ok. My bad then :P Sepguilherme (talk) 16:28, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Nanonic/NF vs MU news sources


A tag has been placed on User:Nanonic/NF vs MU news sources requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football-united-wary-of-big-ron-effect-1069133.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 14:33, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Football in Germany portal selected articles


A tag has been placed on Category:Football in Germany portal selected articles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 02:53, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Football in Germany portal selected pictures


A tag has been placed on Category:Football in Germany portal selected pictures requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 02:54, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Football in Germany portal selected biographies


A tag has been placed on Category:Football in Germany portal selected biographies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 02:54, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Football in Argentina portal selected articles


A tag has been placed on Category:Football in Argentina portal selected articles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 02:55, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Football in Argentina portal selected pictures


A tag has been placed on Category:Football in Argentina portal selected pictures requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 02:55, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Football in Argentina portal selected biographies


A tag has been placed on Category:Football in Argentina portal selected biographies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 02:56, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Football in Germany portal


A tag has been placed on Category:Football in Germany portal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 03:30, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Football in Argentina portal


A tag has been placed on Category:Football in Argentina portal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 03:35, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Portal:Soccer in the United States
Portal:Soccer in the United States, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Soccer in the United States and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Soccer in the United States during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 03:34, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Soccer in the United States portal selected pictures


A tag has been placed on Category:Soccer in the United States portal selected pictures requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:05, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Soccer in the United States portal selected articles


A tag has been placed on Category:Soccer in the United States portal selected articles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:08, 3 July 2019 (UTC)