User talk:Naobaby

December 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Rob Banzai (talk) 14:20, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by some search engines, including Google. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Rob Banzai (talk) 14:21, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rob Banzai (talk) 00:49, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * NOTE: This editor has not added any of these links since Rbanzai began removing them. And they are links to English-language interviews and profiles for very hard to source Japanese subjects, at a commercial site, not vandalism. Dekkappai (talk) 01:18, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * For clarification they are indeed spam links. One for example leads to a site plastered with ads for "non-mosaic" versions of pornos. That fits my definition of a spam link. Info is good but not when it comes festooned with ads. :D Rob Banzai (talk) 21:44, 3 January 2009 (UTC)