User talk:NaomiAmethyst/Archives/2012/June

Speedy deletion nomination of ClueNet


A tag has been placed on ClueNet requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Tow  talk  07:01, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of ClueNet for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ClueNet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/ClueNet (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Tow  talk  20:46, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Hello!
Just a heads up, you may want to watch yours and ClueBot's pages for edits from this person. To me they're stating the obvious on their page I'm just trying to work out who they are. They keep saying that Materialscientist blocked them - the block log is empty and that ClueBot is their arch enemy - from their page history only me and another editor have placed warnings! I get the feeling if ClueBot reverts so much as one of their edits then they will heavily vandalise the Bot's page at least. They've already been vandalising Crispy's page. I've given Rich and Damian a heads up as well but just watch that editor :)--5 albert square (talk) 20:32, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

ClueBot NG
I'm sick of this bot. It's the second time that it reverts perfectly reasonable editions: first here and now here. This is serious. Wikipedia shouldn't be reverting massively this way. This will only alienate new users. --190.133.1.3 (talk) 19:12, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

I'm sick of this bot. It keeps undoing what I have edited, and so I need it blocked. I don't know how to prevent it from hitting me, but it alienates me!!!!!!!! I hate the bot, and it looks like putting spam on our Gmail accounts. Well, if you don't delete or block the bot, I will NEVER sign up to Wikipedia again with the IP address I am using!!!!! (125.163.158.31 (talk) 09:20, 14 June 2012 (UTC))